Validation of the automated neuropsychological assessment metrics for assessing cognitive impairment in systemic lupus erythematosus.
ANAM
CART analysis
cognitive impairment
lupus
screening
systemic lupus erythematosus
Journal
Lupus
ISSN: 1477-0962
Titre abrégé: Lupus
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9204265
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Jan 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
28
12
2021
medline:
9
3
2022
entrez:
27
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We previously demonstrated the utility of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) for screening cognitive impairment (CI) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and developed composite indices for interpreting ANAM results. Our objectives here were to provide further support for the ANAM's concurrent criterion validity against the American College of Rheumatology neuropsychological battery (ACR-NB), identify the most discriminatory subtests and scores of the ANAM for predicting CI, and provide a new approach to interpret ANAM results using Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis. 300 adult SLE patients completed an adapted ACR-NB and ANAM on the same day. As per objectives, six models were built using combinations of ANAM subtests and scores and submitted to CART analysis. Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the ANAM's criterion validity compared to the adapted ACR-NB; the most discriminatory ANAM subtests and scores in each model were selected, and performance of models with the highest AUCs were compared to our previous composite indices; decision trees were generated for models with the highest AUCs. Two models had excellent AUCs of 86 and 89%. Eight most discriminatory ANAM subtests and scores were identified. Both models demonstrated higher AUCs against our previous composite indices. An adapted decision tree was created to simplify the interpretation of ANAM results. We provide further validity evidence for the ANAM as a valid CI screening tool in SLE. The decision tree improves interpretation of ANAM results, enhancing clinical utility.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34957878
doi: 10.1177/09612033211062530
pmc: PMC8793300
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
45-54Références
Arthritis Rheum. 1999 Apr;42(4):599-608
pubmed: 10211873
Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:135-68
pubmed: 23020641
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Mar;65(3):372-81
pubmed: 22933364
Heart Lung. 2015 Sep-Oct;44(5):387-94
pubmed: 26354858
Bioinformatics. 2005 Oct 15;21(20):3940-1
pubmed: 16096348
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Mar 17;12:77
pubmed: 21414208
Neurology. 2001 Aug 14;57(3):496-500
pubmed: 11502919
Mil Med. 2015 Jun;180(6):660-9
pubmed: 26032381
Mil Med. 2012 Mar;177(3):256-69
pubmed: 22479912
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018 Oct;48(2):240-255
pubmed: 29571540
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Oct;72 Suppl 10:660-675
pubmed: 33091255
Clin Neuropsychol. 1999 Aug;13(3):348-58
pubmed: 10726605
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2019 Sep;21(3):227-237
pubmed: 31749647
Clin Neuropsychol. 2001 Dec;15(4):498-507
pubmed: 11935451
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Jun 15;55(3):434-41
pubmed: 16739211
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016 Jun 16;2:16039
pubmed: 27306639
Behav Res Methods. 2006 Nov;38(4):569-73
pubmed: 17393825
Lupus. 2003;12(9):697-703
pubmed: 14514133
Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29-36
pubmed: 7063747
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Feb;22 Suppl 1:S63-77
pubmed: 17145163
Arthritis Rheum. 2010 May;62(5):1478-86
pubmed: 20155829
Mult Scler. 2003 Mar;9(2):119-27
pubmed: 12708806
Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Oct 15;51(5):810-8
pubmed: 15478145
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Feb;22 Suppl 1:S115-26
pubmed: 17101258
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Jan;71(1):33-42
pubmed: 29927108
Clin Neuropsychol. 2018 Apr;32(3):479-494
pubmed: 28832273