Phrenic Nerve Injury During Cryoballoon-Based Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Results of the Worldwide YETI Registry.
Aged
Atrial Fibrillation
/ diagnosis
Cryosurgery
/ adverse effects
Female
Humans
Iatrogenic Disease
Incidence
Male
Middle Aged
Peripheral Nerve Injuries
/ diagnosis
Phrenic Nerve
/ injuries
Pulmonary Veins
/ surgery
Registries
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
atrial fibrillation
catheter ablation
cryoballoon
incidence
phrenic nerve injury
Journal
Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology
ISSN: 1941-3084
Titre abrégé: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101474365
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2022
01 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
29
12
2021
medline:
1
3
2022
entrez:
28
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has emerged as an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation. The most frequent complication during cryoballoon-based PVI is phrenic nerve injury (PNI). However, data on PNI are scarce. The YETI registry is a retrospective, multicenter, and multinational registry evaluating the incidence, characteristics, prognostic factors for PNI recovery and follow-up data of patients with PNI during cryoballoon-based PVI. Experienced electrophysiological centers were invited to participate. All patients with PNI during CB2 or third (CB3) and fourth-generation cryoballoon (CB4)-based PVI were eligible. A total of 17 356 patients underwent cryoballoon-based PVI in 33 centers from 10 countries. A total of 731 (4.2%) patients experienced PNI. The mean time to PNI was 127.7±50.4 seconds, and the mean temperature at the time of PNI was -49±8°C. At the end of the procedure, PNI recovered in 394/731 patients (53.9%). Recovery of PNI at 12 months of follow-up was found in 97.0% of patients (682/703, with 28 patients lost to follow-up). A total of 16/703 (2.3%) reported symptomatic PNI. Only 0.06% of the overall population showed symptomatic and permanent PNI. Prognostic factors improving PNI recovery are immediate stop at PNI by double-stop technique and utilization of a bonus-freeze protocol. Age, cryoballoon temperature at PNI, and compound motor action potential amplitude loss >30% were identified as factors decreasing PNI recovery. Based on these parameters, a score was calculated. The YETI score has a numerical value that will directly represent the probability of a specific patient of recovering from PNI within 12 months. The incidence of PNI during cryoballoon-based PVI was 4.2%. Overall 97% of PNI recovered within 12 months. Symptomatic and permanent PNI is exceedingly rare in patients after cryoballoon-based PVI. The YETI score estimates the prognosis after iatrogenic cryoballoon-derived PNI. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03645577. Graphic Abstract: A graphic abstract is available for this article.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has emerged as an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation. The most frequent complication during cryoballoon-based PVI is phrenic nerve injury (PNI). However, data on PNI are scarce.
METHODS
The YETI registry is a retrospective, multicenter, and multinational registry evaluating the incidence, characteristics, prognostic factors for PNI recovery and follow-up data of patients with PNI during cryoballoon-based PVI. Experienced electrophysiological centers were invited to participate. All patients with PNI during CB2 or third (CB3) and fourth-generation cryoballoon (CB4)-based PVI were eligible.
RESULTS
A total of 17 356 patients underwent cryoballoon-based PVI in 33 centers from 10 countries. A total of 731 (4.2%) patients experienced PNI. The mean time to PNI was 127.7±50.4 seconds, and the mean temperature at the time of PNI was -49±8°C. At the end of the procedure, PNI recovered in 394/731 patients (53.9%). Recovery of PNI at 12 months of follow-up was found in 97.0% of patients (682/703, with 28 patients lost to follow-up). A total of 16/703 (2.3%) reported symptomatic PNI. Only 0.06% of the overall population showed symptomatic and permanent PNI. Prognostic factors improving PNI recovery are immediate stop at PNI by double-stop technique and utilization of a bonus-freeze protocol. Age, cryoballoon temperature at PNI, and compound motor action potential amplitude loss >30% were identified as factors decreasing PNI recovery. Based on these parameters, a score was calculated. The YETI score has a numerical value that will directly represent the probability of a specific patient of recovering from PNI within 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS
The incidence of PNI during cryoballoon-based PVI was 4.2%. Overall 97% of PNI recovered within 12 months. Symptomatic and permanent PNI is exceedingly rare in patients after cryoballoon-based PVI. The YETI score estimates the prognosis after iatrogenic cryoballoon-derived PNI. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03645577. Graphic Abstract: A graphic abstract is available for this article.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34962134
doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.121.010516
pmc: PMC8772436
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03645577']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e010516Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Heart Rhythm. 2018 Sep;15(9):1348-1355
pubmed: 29684571
Europace. 2018 Sep 1;20(9):1459-1467
pubmed: 29016779
Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 Jun;105(6):482-8
pubmed: 26608161
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014 Feb;25(2):187-94
pubmed: 24102792
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Sep;10(9):1318-24
pubmed: 23891574
Europace. 2018 Oct 1;20(10):e156-e163
pubmed: 29182748
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Jul;12(7):1658-66
pubmed: 25778428
Europace. 2015 Apr;17(4):574-8
pubmed: 25564551
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 9;374(23):2235-45
pubmed: 27042964
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015 Apr;8(2):303-7
pubmed: 25740826
Europace. 2015 May;17(5):725-31
pubmed: 25618741
Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 Sep;105(9):774-82
pubmed: 27085722
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Aug;31(8):1932-1941
pubmed: 32419183
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Dec;13(12):2306-2313
pubmed: 27503480
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Apr;7(2):288-92
pubmed: 24610797
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015 May;26(5):493-500
pubmed: 25644659
Europace. 2019 Sep 1;21(9):1313-1324
pubmed: 31199860
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Sep 1;266:106-111
pubmed: 29887425
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Aug 1;312:73-80
pubmed: 32241572
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Apr;14(4):495-500
pubmed: 27956248
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014 May;25(5):466-470
pubmed: 24400647
Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498
pubmed: 32860505
Europace. 2015 Jun;17(6):884-90
pubmed: 25488959
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015 Oct;8(5):1088-94
pubmed: 26338833
Circulation. 2019 Nov 26;140(22):1779-1788
pubmed: 31630538
Cardiol J. 2019;26(4):368-374
pubmed: 29924380
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Apr;12(4):673-80
pubmed: 25542427
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Mar 24;7(7):
pubmed: 29574457