Longitudinal dynamics of SARS-CoV-2-specific cellular and humoral immunity after natural infection or BNT162b2 vaccination.
Adult
Aged
Antibodies, Neutralizing
/ blood
Antibodies, Viral
/ blood
BNT162 Vaccine
/ immunology
COVID-19
/ immunology
Female
Humans
Immunoglobulin G
/ blood
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Middle Aged
SARS-CoV-2
/ immunology
Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
/ immunology
T-Lymphocytes
/ immunology
Vaccination
Journal
PLoS pathogens
ISSN: 1553-7374
Titre abrégé: PLoS Pathog
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101238921
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2021
12 2021
Historique:
received:
26
08
2021
accepted:
16
12
2021
revised:
13
01
2022
pubmed:
29
12
2021
medline:
27
1
2022
entrez:
28
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The timing of the development of specific adaptive immunity after natural SARS-CoV-2 infection, and its relevance in clinical outcome, has not been characterized in depth. Description of the long-term maintenance of both cellular and humoral responses elicited by real-world anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is still scarce. Here we aimed to understand the development of optimal protective responses after SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination. We performed an early, longitudinal study of S1-, M- and N-specific IFN-γ and IL-2 T cell immunity and anti-S total and neutralizing antibodies in 88 mild, moderate or severe acute COVID-19 patients. Moreover, SARS-CoV-2-specific adaptive immunity was also analysed in 234 COVID-19 recovered subjects, 28 uninfected BNT162b2-vaccinees and 30 uninfected healthy controls. Upon natural infection, cellular and humoral responses were early and coordinated in mild patients, while weak and inconsistent in severe patients. The S1-specific cellular response measured at hospital arrival was an independent predictive factor against severity. In COVID-19 recovered patients, four to seven months post-infection, cellular immunity was maintained but antibodies and neutralization capacity declined. Finally, a robust Th1-driven immune response was developed in uninfected BNT162b2-vaccinees. Three months post-vaccination, the cellular response was comparable, while the humoral response was consistently stronger, to that measured in COVID-19 recovered patients. Thus, measurement of both humoral and cellular responses provides information on prognosis and protection from infection, which may add value for individual and public health recommendations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34962970
doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010211
pii: PPATHOGENS-D-21-01759
pmc: PMC8757952
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Neutralizing
0
Antibodies, Viral
0
Immunoglobulin G
0
Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
0
BNT162 Vaccine
N38TVC63NU
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1010211Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7830):594-599
pubmed: 32998157
Nat Med. 2020 Jun;26(6):845-848
pubmed: 32350462
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Nov;9(11):e104-e105
pubmed: 34687656
Science. 2020 Oct 23;370(6515):
pubmed: 32972996
Life (Basel). 2021 Oct 12;11(10):
pubmed: 34685448
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7821):463-469
pubmed: 32717743
Science. 2020 Aug 14;369(6505):806-811
pubmed: 32434945
Sci Immunol. 2021 Apr 15;6(58):
pubmed: 33858945
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7821):457-462
pubmed: 32668444
Science. 2020 Aug 14;369(6505):818-823
pubmed: 32616673
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Sep 28;9(10):
pubmed: 34696200
J Clin Invest. 2020 Oct 1;130(10):5235-5244
pubmed: 32634129
Nat Med. 2021 Jun;27(6):1055-1061
pubmed: 33875890
Euro Surveill. 2020 Jan;25(3):
pubmed: 31992387
Cell. 2020 Oct 1;183(1):158-168.e14
pubmed: 32979941
Lancet. 2021 Jul 31;398(10298):385-387
pubmed: 34274038
Cell. 2020 Jun 25;181(7):1489-1501.e15
pubmed: 32473127
Immunity. 2020 Aug 18;53(2):248-263
pubmed: 32717182
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Apr 02;70(13):495-500
pubmed: 33793460
JAMA. 2020 May 26;323(20):2052-2059
pubmed: 32320003
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054-1062
pubmed: 32171076
J Clin Invest. 2022 Jan 18;132(2):
pubmed: 34843448
Cell. 2020 Nov 12;183(4):996-1012.e19
pubmed: 33010815
Nat Med. 2021 Jul;27(7):1178-1186
pubmed: 33953384
J Clin Invest. 2021 Jun 15;131(12):
pubmed: 33939647
Science. 2020 Oct 23;370(6515):
pubmed: 32972995
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Oct;146(4):799-807.e9
pubmed: 32710975
Science. 2020 May 1;368(6490):473-474
pubmed: 32303591
Cell Rep. 2021 Feb 9;34(6):108728
pubmed: 33516277
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 9;385(24):e84
pubmed: 34614326
Front Immunol. 2018 Jun 15;9:1221
pubmed: 29963040
Nat Immunol. 2021 May;22(5):620-626
pubmed: 33674800
N Engl J Med. 2021 May 6;384(18):1775-1777
pubmed: 33755373
J Clin Virol. 2020 Apr;125:104305
pubmed: 32143123
EMBO Mol Med. 2021 Mar 5;13(3):e13549
pubmed: 33471406
Science. 2021 Feb 5;371(6529):
pubmed: 33408181
Sci Immunol. 2021 May 25;6(59):
pubmed: 34035118
J Clin Invest. 2021 Sep 1;131(17):
pubmed: 34623327
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506
pubmed: 31986264
Nat Rev Immunol. 2015 Feb;15(2):87-103
pubmed: 25614319
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 6;73(11):2145-2147
pubmed: 33825869
Sci Immunol. 2020 Jul 15;5(49):
pubmed: 32669287
Cell. 2020 May 28;181(5):1036-1045.e9
pubmed: 32416070
Immunity. 2020 Oct 13;53(4):864-877.e5
pubmed: 32791036
Immunity. 2021 Feb 9;54(2):340-354.e6
pubmed: 33567252
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Feb;125(2 Suppl 2):S3-23
pubmed: 20176265
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):507-513
pubmed: 32007143
Front Immunol. 2021 Sep 28;12:740708
pubmed: 34650563
Nat Immunol. 2020 Nov;21(11):1336-1345
pubmed: 32887977
Am J Transplant. 2021 Aug;21(8):2785-2794
pubmed: 34092033
Immunity. 2020 Jun 16;52(6):971-977.e3
pubmed: 32413330
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Jun;69(6):1441-1447
pubmed: 33768521
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 31;383(27):2603-2615
pubmed: 33301246
Science. 2020 Aug 7;369(6504):718-724
pubmed: 32661059