Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: sheep and goat pox.
SPP/GTP
monitoring period
protection zone
sampling procedures
surveillance zone
Journal
EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority
ISSN: 1831-4732
Titre abrégé: EFSA J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101642076
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
entrez:
29
12
2021
pubmed:
30
12
2021
medline:
30
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases ('Animal Health Law'). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for sheep and goat pox. In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period and (iii) the minimum radii of the protection and surveillance zones, and the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere; nonetheless, the transmission kernels used for the assessment of the minimum radii of the protection and surveillance zones are shown. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. Different risk-based sampling procedures based on clinical visits and laboratory testing are assessed in case of outbreak suspicion, granting animal movements and for repopulation purposes. The monitoring period of 21 days was assessed as effective. The estimated probability of transmission beyond the protection zone of 3 km radius from an infectious establishment is 9.6% (95% CI: 3.1-25.8%) and 2.3% (95% CI: 1-5.5%) for the surveillance zone of 10 km radius. This may be considered sufficient to contain the disease spread (95% probability of containing transmission corresponds to 5.3 Km). To contain 99% of the spread, the radius should be increased to 19.4 km (95% CI: 9.8-26.8). This may increase the number of farms in the surveillance zone, since the area would increase fourfold.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34963791
doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6933
pii: EFS26933
pmc: PMC8711069
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e06933Informations de copyright
© 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.
Références
EFSA J. 2018 Jan 24;16(1):e05123
pubmed: 32625671
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 1;7(1):16774
pubmed: 29196741
Viruses. 2020 Sep 28;12(10):
pubmed: 32998423
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2019 Jan;66(1):181-185
pubmed: 30126058
J Comp Pathol. 1978 Apr;88(2):205-10
pubmed: 207747
Prev Vet Med. 2020 Aug;181:104704
pubmed: 31196699
Biologicals. 2011 Nov;39(6):417-23
pubmed: 21993305
EFSA J. 2021 Jan 31;19(1):e06402
pubmed: 33552298
J Wildl Dis. 2021 Apr 1;57(2):439-442
pubmed: 33822163
J Virol Methods. 2011 Jan;171(1):134-40
pubmed: 21029751
J Virol Methods. 2020 Mar;277:113800
pubmed: 31837373
Can Vet J. 1986 Aug;27(8):301-6
pubmed: 17422683
J Virol Methods. 2013 Nov;193(2):446-51
pubmed: 23850698
Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006 Jan;29(1):27-60
pubmed: 16458357
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017 Jun;64(3):729-745
pubmed: 26564428
Vaccine. 2009 Apr 28;27(19):2548-53
pubmed: 19428860
Res Vet Sci. 1986 Sep;41(2):247-50
pubmed: 3022361
J Virol Methods. 2009 Oct;161(1):19-29
pubmed: 19426763
Antiviral Res. 2015 Nov;123:39-49
pubmed: 26341190
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2014 Mar;26(2):195-202
pubmed: 24567543
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2009 May;56(4):132-41
pubmed: 19281604
EFSA J. 2021 Jul 30;19(7):e06708
pubmed: 34354766
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2021 Jul 15;:
pubmed: 34268873
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2010 Oct;57(5):375-82
pubmed: 20673232
Dev Biol (Basel). 2003;114:161-7
pubmed: 14677686