Selinexor in combination with standard chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors.
Capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX)
Carboplatin
Doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide
FOLFIRI
Irinotecan
Selinexor (KPT 330)
Journal
Experimental hematology & oncology
ISSN: 2162-3619
Titre abrégé: Exp Hematol Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101590676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Dec 2021
29 Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
02
10
2021
accepted:
18
12
2021
entrez:
30
12
2021
pubmed:
31
12
2021
medline:
31
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Selinexor, an oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE), was demonstrated to hinder the DNA damage repair (DDR) system by reducing DDR proteins while enhancing the killing of cancer cells by DDR-based therapeutics in vivo studies. In this single-center, multi-arm phase 1b study, selinexor with carboplatin, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (DC), irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid (FOLFIRI), irinotecan, and capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX), were employed as separate parallel arms. Eligible patients have relapsed/ metastatic refractory solid tumors following standard therapy or addition of selinexor to systemic therapy was appropriate. Nineteen patients were treated in the 5 arms. Tumor types included were colorectal (n = 3), breast (n = 3), neuroendocrine (n = 2), ovarian (n = 2), and pancreas cancers (n = 2). All patients developed one treatment-related adverse events (TRAE). The most prevalent TRAE were thrombocytopenia (84%), nausea (68%), leukopenia (68%), neutropenia (63%), and fatigue (58%). The common grade 3/4 TRAE were neutropenia (42%), leukopenia (26%), and hyponatremia (21%). Three patients had dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) in 3 separate arms. Fourteen patients were evaluable for response. Although no patients achieved complete or partial response (CR or PR), seven patients attained stable disease (SD). Disease control rate (DCR) was 14%. The combination of oral selinexor with different standard chemotherapies showed limited clinical activity despite toxicity and DLT prevented further dose escalation. Optimizing supportive care, the utility of growth factors, and aggressive measures on antiemetics strategies remain tangible.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02419495. Registered 14 April 2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02419495 ). Sponsor(s): Karyopharm Therapeutics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34965890
doi: 10.1186/s40164-021-00251-0
pii: 10.1186/s40164-021-00251-0
pmc: PMC8715578
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02419495']
Types de publication
Letter
Langues
eng
Pagination
59Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA016672
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR003167
Pays : United States
Organisme : Clinical and Translational Sciences Award (NIH/NCATS)
ID : (1UL1TR003167)
Organisme : MD Anderson Cancer Support Grant (NIH-NCI)
ID : (P30CA016672)
Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Oncotarget. 2018 Jul 20;9(56):30773-30786
pubmed: 30112106
Breast Cancer Res. 2017 Aug 15;19(1):93
pubmed: 28810913
Oncologist. 2019 Jul;24(7):887-e416
pubmed: 30996012
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Feb;156(2):308-314
pubmed: 31822399
Semin Cancer Biol. 2014 Aug;27:74-86
pubmed: 24755012
Semin Cancer Biol. 2014 Aug;27:52-61
pubmed: 24631835
Oncotarget. 2018 Oct 2;9(77):34567-34581
pubmed: 30349650
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 10;34(26):3166-74
pubmed: 27458288