Oligosarcomas, IDH-mutant are distinct and aggressive.
1p/19q
Codeletion
DNA methylation
Gliosarcoma
NF1
Oligodendroglioma
Oligosarcoma
Prognosis
SMA
Subtype
TERT
TP53
Type
Variant
YAP1
Journal
Acta neuropathologica
ISSN: 1432-0533
Titre abrégé: Acta Neuropathol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0412041
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2022
02 2022
Historique:
received:
30
07
2021
accepted:
05
12
2021
revised:
15
11
2021
pubmed:
31
12
2021
medline:
8
3
2022
entrez:
30
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Oligodendrogliomas are defined at the molecular level by the presence of an IDH mutation and codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q. In the past, case reports and small studies described gliomas with sarcomatous features arising from oligodendrogliomas, so called oligosarcomas. Here, we report a series of 24 IDH-mutant oligosarcomas from 23 patients forming a distinct methylation class. The tumors were recurrences from prior oligodendrogliomas or developed de novo. Precursor tumors of 12 oligosarcomas were histologically and molecularly indistinguishable from conventional oligodendrogliomas. Oligosarcoma tumor cells were embedded in a dense network of reticulin fibers, frequently showing p53 accumulation, positivity for SMA and CALD1, loss of OLIG2 and gain of H3K27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) as compared to primary lesions. In 5 oligosarcomas no 1p/19q codeletion was detectable, although it was present in the primary lesions. Copy number neutral LOH was determined as underlying mechanism. Oligosarcomas harbored an increased chromosomal copy number variation load with frequent CDKN2A/B deletions. Proteomic profiling demonstrated oligosarcomas to be highly distinct from conventional CNS WHO grade 3 oligodendrogliomas with consistent evidence for a smooth muscle differentiation. Expression of several tumor suppressors was reduced with NF1 being lost frequently. In contrast, oncogenic YAP1 was aberrantly overexpressed in oligosarcomas. Panel sequencing revealed mutations in NF1 and TP53 along with IDH1/2 and TERT promoter mutations. Survival of patients was significantly poorer for oligosarcomas as first recurrence than for grade 3 oligodendrogliomas as first recurrence. These results establish oligosarcomas as a distinct group of IDH-mutant gliomas differing from conventional oligodendrogliomas on the histologic, epigenetic, proteomic, molecular and clinical level. The diagnosis can be based on the combined presence of (a) sarcomatous histology, (b) IDH-mutation and (c) TERT promoter mutation and/or 1p/19q codeletion, or, in unresolved cases, on its characteristic DNA methylation profile.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34967922
doi: 10.1007/s00401-021-02395-z
pii: 10.1007/s00401-021-02395-z
pmc: PMC8742817
doi:
Substances chimiques
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase
EC 1.1.1.41
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
263-281Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Acta Neuropathol. 2019 Aug;138(2):331-334
pubmed: 31065834
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 23;9(1):19704
pubmed: 31873172
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 20;35(21):2394-2401
pubmed: 28640702
Nature. 2019 Dec;576(7785):112-120
pubmed: 31748746
Acta Neuropathol. 2017 Nov;134(5):705-714
pubmed: 28733933
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1976 Nov-Dec;35(6):679-84
pubmed: 993817
Acta Neuropathol. 2020 Mar;139(3):603-608
pubmed: 31996992
Genome Biol. 2009;10(11):R128
pubmed: 19903341
Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2017 Mar 7;5(1):18
pubmed: 28270234
Acta Neuropathol. 2015 Jan;129(1):133-46
pubmed: 25427834
Pathol Int. 2018 Oct;68(10):567-573
pubmed: 30246385
Acta Neuropathol. 2021 Jan;141(1):85-100
pubmed: 33216206
Brain Pathol. 2010 Jan;20(1):245-54
pubmed: 19903171
Acta Neuropathol. 2018 Jun;135(6):955-963
pubmed: 29627952
Acta Neuropathol. 2012 Oct;124(4):547-60
pubmed: 22810491
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 7;374(14):1344-55
pubmed: 27050206
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020 Jul;19(7):480-494
pubmed: 32555376
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Dec;162(12):3019-3024
pubmed: 32785787
Am J Surg Pathol. 2007 Mar;31(3):351-62
pubmed: 17325476
Acta Neuropathol. 2014 Apr;127(4):565-72
pubmed: 24464231
Cancer. 1978 Dec;42(6):2753-8
pubmed: 728872
Neuro Oncol. 2019 Sep 6;21(9):1164-1174
pubmed: 31140557
Clin Neuropathol. 2013 May-Jun;32(3):165-70
pubmed: 23254140
Neuro Oncol. 2013 Sep;15(9):1244-50
pubmed: 23861470
Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Dec;26(12):1367-72
pubmed: 19029910
Acta Neuropathol. 2020 Jan;139(1):211-213
pubmed: 31773240
Neuro Oncol. 2019 Dec 17;21(12):1519-1528
pubmed: 31832685
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Feb 27;11(3):
pubmed: 30818875
Nature. 2018 Mar 22;555(7697):469-474
pubmed: 29539639
Acta Neuropathol. 2014 Oct;128(4):551-9
pubmed: 25143301
Neuro Oncol. 2018 Jan 10;20(1):66-77
pubmed: 29016839
Nat Genet. 2014 Nov;46(11):1227-32
pubmed: 25240281
Acta Neuropathol. 2020 Oct;140(4):569-581
pubmed: 32776277
Cell. 2013 Oct 10;155(2):462-77
pubmed: 24120142
Cancer Cell. 2016 Jun 13;29(6):783-803
pubmed: 27300434
Brain Tumor Pathol. 2016 Oct;33(4):255-260
pubmed: 27333891
Pathologica. 1983 Jul-Aug;75(1038):501-8
pubmed: 6669409
Pathol Res Pract. 2012 Dec 15;208(12):750-5
pubmed: 23102810
Neuro Oncol. 2019 May 6;21(5):669-677
pubmed: 30668823
Acta Neuropathol. 2020 Mar;139(3):597-600
pubmed: 31912209
Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Mar 1;27(5):1553-1569
pubmed: 33172899
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2015 May;74(5):442-52
pubmed: 25853694
Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Jun;131(6):903-10
pubmed: 26671409
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jan 20;31(3):344-50
pubmed: 23071237