Anterior intrapelvic approach and suprapectineal quadrilateral surface plate for acetabular fractures with anterior involvement: a retrospective study of 34 patients.
Acetabular fracture
Anterior column
Anterior intrapelvic approach to the acetabulum
Quadrilateral surface
Suprapectineal plate
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Dec 2021
30 Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
23
11
2021
accepted:
24
11
2021
entrez:
31
12
2021
pubmed:
1
1
2022
medline:
4
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the use of the suprapectineal quadrilateral surface (QLS) plates associated with the anterior intrapelvic approach (AIP) to the acetabulum in the surgical treatment of acetabular fractures with anterior involvement. We did a retrospective study of patients surgically treated with QLS plates and AIP for acetabular fractures with the involvement of the anterior column, between February 2018 and February 2020, in our Hospital. The following data were recorded: mechanism of injury, the pattern of fracture, presence of other associated injuries, the time before performing the surgery, surgical approach, position on operating table, time of surgery, intraoperative bleeding, hospitalization time, intraoperative and postoperative complications. Follow-ups were performed at 1, 3, 6, 12 months, then annually. The clinical-functional outcome was assessed with the Merle d'Aubigne Postel score (MAP) modified by Matta; while the radiological outcome with the Matta Radiological Scoring System (MRSS). A Chi-square test was utilized to examine associations between parametric variables. We included 34 patients, mean age 62.1, with an average follow-up of 20.7 months. The most frequent traumatic mechanism was road trauma. There were 15 isolated anterior columns and 19 associated patterns. There were 5 cases of associated visceral injuries, and 10 cases of other associated skeletal fractures. All patients were in the supine position. The surgical approach used was the AIP in all cases, with the addition of the first window of the ilioinguinal approach in 16 cases and of the Kocher-Langenbeck approach in 2 cases. The average time before performing the surgery was 8.5 days. The mean time of the surgery and the mean length of stay after surgery were 227.9 min and 8.2 days, respectively. There weren't cases of intra-operative complications, while there were postoperative complications in 5 patients. The MRSS was judged anatomical in 26 cases, imperfect in 7 cases and poor in 1 case. The average MAP value was 15.2. We observed a significant relationship between the radiological outcome and the clinical outcome (p < 0.05). The QLS plates in association with the AIP approach represent an effective treatment strategy for the treatment of acetabular fractures with anterior involvement.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the use of the suprapectineal quadrilateral surface (QLS) plates associated with the anterior intrapelvic approach (AIP) to the acetabulum in the surgical treatment of acetabular fractures with anterior involvement.
METHODS
METHODS
We did a retrospective study of patients surgically treated with QLS plates and AIP for acetabular fractures with the involvement of the anterior column, between February 2018 and February 2020, in our Hospital. The following data were recorded: mechanism of injury, the pattern of fracture, presence of other associated injuries, the time before performing the surgery, surgical approach, position on operating table, time of surgery, intraoperative bleeding, hospitalization time, intraoperative and postoperative complications. Follow-ups were performed at 1, 3, 6, 12 months, then annually. The clinical-functional outcome was assessed with the Merle d'Aubigne Postel score (MAP) modified by Matta; while the radiological outcome with the Matta Radiological Scoring System (MRSS). A Chi-square test was utilized to examine associations between parametric variables.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We included 34 patients, mean age 62.1, with an average follow-up of 20.7 months. The most frequent traumatic mechanism was road trauma. There were 15 isolated anterior columns and 19 associated patterns. There were 5 cases of associated visceral injuries, and 10 cases of other associated skeletal fractures. All patients were in the supine position. The surgical approach used was the AIP in all cases, with the addition of the first window of the ilioinguinal approach in 16 cases and of the Kocher-Langenbeck approach in 2 cases. The average time before performing the surgery was 8.5 days. The mean time of the surgery and the mean length of stay after surgery were 227.9 min and 8.2 days, respectively. There weren't cases of intra-operative complications, while there were postoperative complications in 5 patients. The MRSS was judged anatomical in 26 cases, imperfect in 7 cases and poor in 1 case. The average MAP value was 15.2. We observed a significant relationship between the radiological outcome and the clinical outcome (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The QLS plates in association with the AIP approach represent an effective treatment strategy for the treatment of acetabular fractures with anterior involvement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34969392
doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04908-z
pii: 10.1186/s12891-021-04908-z
pmc: PMC8717694
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1060Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Melhem E, Riouallon G, Habboubi K, Gabbas M, Jouffroy P. Epidemiology of pelvic and acetabular fractures in France. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020;106(5):831–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.11.019 Epub 2020 Feb 1. PMID: 32019733.
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.11.019
pubmed: 32019733
Rinne PP, Laitinen MK, Kannus P, Mattila VM. The incidence of pelvic fractures and related surgery in the Finnish adult population: a nationwide study of 33,469 patients between 1997 and 2014. Acta Orthop. 2020;91(5):587–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1771827 Epub 2020 Jun 5. PMID: 32500790.
doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1771827
pubmed: 32500790
pmcid: 8023963
Liuzza F, Silluzio N, Florio M, El Ezzo O, Cazzato G, Ciolli G, et al. Comparison between posterior sacral plate stabilization versus minimally invasive transiliac-transsacral lag-screw fixation in fractures of sacrum: a single-Centre experience. Int Orthop. 2019;43(1):177–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4144-z Epub 2018 Sep 17. PMID: 30225589.
doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4144-z
pubmed: 30225589
Kistler BJ, Smithson IR, Cooper SA, Cox JL, Nayak AN, Santoni BG, et al. Are quadrilateral surface buttress plates comparable to traditional forms of transverse acetabular fracture fixation? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(11):3353–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3800-x Erratum in: Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015 Jan;473(1):402. PMID: 25080262; PMCID: PMC4182403.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3800-x
pubmed: 25080262
pmcid: 4182403
Chen K, Yang F, Yao S, Xiong Z, Sun T, Guo X. Biomechanical comparison of different fixation techniques for typical acetabular fractures in the elderly: the role of special quadrilateral surface buttress plates. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020;102(14):e81. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.01027 PMID: 32675678; PMCID: PMC7508287.
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01027
pubmed: 32675678
Schmidt W, LiArno S, Khlopas A, Petersik A, Mont MA. Stryker Orthopaedic modeling and analytics (SOMA): a review. Surg Technol Int. 2018;1(32):315–24 PMID: 29791698.
Trikha V, Das S, Aruljothi V, Chowdhury B. prospective evaluation of outcome of acetabular fractures managed by anterior intrapelvic approach. Indian J Orthop. 2020;54(Suppl 2):228–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-020-00154-y PMID: 33194096; PMCID: PMC7609757.
doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00154-y
pubmed: 33194096
pmcid: 7609757
Sagi HC, Afsari A, Dziadosz D. The anterior intra-pelvic (modified rives-stoppa) approach for fixation of acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(5):263–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181dd0b84 PMID: 20418730.
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181dd0b84
pubmed: 20418730
Ciolli G, Caviglia D, Vitiello C, Lucchesi S, Pinelli C, De Mauro D, et al. Navigated percutaneous screw fixation of the pelvis with O-arm 2: two years' experience. Med Glas (Zenica). 2021;18(1):309–15. https://doi.org/10.17392/1326-21 PMID: 33480224.
doi: 10.17392/1326-21
pubmed: 33480224
De Mauro D, Rovere G, Smimmo A, Meschini C, Mocini F, Maccauro G, et al. COVID-19 pandemic: management of patients affected by SARS-CoV-2 in Rome COVID Hospital 2 Trauma Centre and safety of our surgical team. Int Orthop. 2020;44(12):2487–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04715-6 Epub 2020 Jul 15. PMID: 32671432; PMCID: PMC7363161.
doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04715-6
pubmed: 32671432
Letournel E. Acetabulum fractures: classification and management. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;151:81–106 PMID: 7418327 .
Visutipol B, Chobtangsin P, Ketmalasiri B, Pattarabanjird N, Varodompun N. Evaluation of Letournel and Judet classification of acetabular fracture with plain radiographs and three-dimensional computerized tomographic scan. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2000;8(1):33–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900000800107 PMID: 12468873.
doi: 10.1177/230949900000800107
pubmed: 12468873
Matta JM. Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78(11):1632–45 PMID: 8934477.
doi: 10.2106/00004623-199611000-00002
pubmed: 8934477
Matta JM, Mehne DK, Roffi R. Fractures of the acetabulum. Early results of a prospective study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;(205):241–50 PMID: 3698383.
Meena UK, Tripathy SK, Sen RK, Aggarwal S, Behera P. Predictors of postoperative outcome for acetabular fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99(8):929–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2013.09.004 Epub 2013 Oct 30. PMID: 24183746.
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.09.004
pubmed: 24183746
Muzii VF, Rollo G, Rocca G, Erasmo R, Falzarano G, Liuzza F, et al. Radiographic and functional outcome of complex acetabular fractures: implications of open reduction in spinopelvic balance, gait and quality of life. Med Glas (Zenica). 2021;18(1):273–9. https://doi.org/10.17392/1300-21 PMID: 33219639.
doi: 10.17392/1300-21
pubmed: 33219639
Liuzza F, Capasso L, Florio M, Mocini F, Masci G, Cazzato G, et al. Transiliosacral fixation using the O-ARM2® and STEALTHSTATION® navigation system. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2018;32(6 Suppl. 1):163–71 PMID: 30644298.
pubmed: 30644298
Florio M, Capasso L, Olivi A, Vitiello C, Leone A, Liuzza F. 3D - Navigated percutaneous screw fixation of pelvic ring injuries - a pilot study. Injury. 2020;51(Suppl 3):S28–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.07.025 Epub 2020 Jul 10. Erratum in: Injury. 2021 Feb 12;: PMID: 32723529.
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.07.025
pubmed: 32723529
Rovere G, Perna A, Meccariello L, De Mauro D, Smimmo A, Proietti L, et al. Epidemiology and aetiology of male and female sexual dysfunctions related to pelvic ring injuries: a systematic review. Int Orthop. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05153-8 Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34378143.
Butterwick D, Papp S, Gofton W, Liew A, Beaulé PE. Acetabular fractures in the elderly: evaluation and management. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(9):758–68. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.01037 PMID: 25948523.
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01037
pubmed: 25948523
Antell NB, Switzer JA, Schmidt AH. Management of Acetabular Fractures in the elderly. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017;25(8):577–85. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00510 PMID: 28737617.
doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00510
pubmed: 28737617
White G, Kanakaris NK, Faour O, Valverde JA, Martin MA, Giannoudis PV. Quadrilateral plate fractures of the acetabulum: an update. Injury. 2013;44(2):159–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2012.10.010 Epub 2012 Oct 31. PMID: 23121991.
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.10.010
pubmed: 23121991
Archdeacon MT, Kazemi N, Collinge C, Budde B, Schnell S. Treatment of protrusio fractures of the acetabulum in patients 70 years and older. J Orthop Trauma. 2013;27(5):256–61. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e318269126f PMID: 22810547.
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318269126f
pubmed: 22810547
Gillispie GJ, Babcock SN, McNamara KP, Dimoff ME, Aneja A, Brown PJ, et al. Biomechanical comparison of Intrapelvic and Extrapelvic fixation for Acetabular fractures involving the quadrilateral plate. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(11):570–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000963 PMID: 29053542.
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000963
pubmed: 29053542
Qureshi AA, Archdeacon MT, Jenkins MA, Infante A, DiPasquale T, Bolhofner BR. Infrapectineal plating for acetabular fractures: a technical adjunct to internal fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(3):175–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200403000-00009 PMID: 15091273.
doi: 10.1097/00005131-200403000-00009
pubmed: 15091273
Tosounidis TH, Gudipati S, Panteli M, Kanakaris NK, Giannoudis PV. The use of buttress plates in the management of acetabular fractures with quadrilateral plate involvement: is it still a valid option? Int Orthop. 2015;39(11):2219–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2883-7 Epub 2015 Jul 24. PMID: 26206259.
doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2883-7
pubmed: 26206259
Gras F, Marintschev I, Grossterlinden L, Rossmann M, Graul I, Hofmann GO, et al. The anterior Intrapelvic approach for Acetabular fractures using approach-specific instruments and an anatomical-Preshaped 3-dimensional Suprapectineal plate. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(7):e210–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000829 PMID: 28240619.
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000829
pubmed: 28240619
Egli RJ, Keel MJB, Cullmann JL, Bastian JD. Secure screw placement in management of acetabular fractures using the suprapectineal quadrilateral buttress plate. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8231301. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8231301 Epub 2017 Jun 15. PMID: 28698880; PMCID: PMC5494112.
doi: 10.1155/2017/8231301
pubmed: 28698880
pmcid: 5494112
Boni G, Pires RE, Sanchez GT, Dos Reis FB, Yoon RS, Liporace FA. Use of a stainless steel locking calcaneal plate for quadrilateral plate buttress in the treatment of acetabular fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019;29(5):1141–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02413-7 Epub 2019 Mar 8. PMID: 30848379.
doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02413-7
pubmed: 30848379
Farid YR. Cerclage wire-plate composite for fixation of quadrilateral plate fractures of the acetabulum: a checkrein and pulley technique. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(5):323–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181c90bbe PMID: 20418739.
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181c90bbe
pubmed: 20418739
Karim MA, Abdelazeem AH, Youness M, El Nahal WA. Fixation of quadrilateral plate fractures of the acetabulum using the buttress screw: a novel technique. Injury. 2017;48(8):1813–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.05.028 Epub 2017 May 24. PMID: 28602177.
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.05.028
pubmed: 28602177
Kulkarni C, Sen A, Jose J. Outcome analysis of surgical management of comminuted quadrilateral plate acetabulum fractures. Int J Res Orthop. 2019;5. 883. https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510 IntJResOrthop20193829.
Nikolopoulos FV, Tzoras NT. (2019) the advantages of Stoppa approach-ilioinguinal modification, for surgical treatment of the acetabulum fractures with the traditional plate and the new anatomical Suprapectineal plate system. J Orthop Case Rep. 2019;10(1):78–81. https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2019.v10.i01.1646 .
doi: 10.13107/jocr.2019.v10.i01.1646
pubmed: 32547985
Vergari A, Frassanito L, Tamburello E, Nestorini R, Sala FD, Lais G, et al. Supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block for postoperative analgesia after Acetabular fracture surgery. Injury. 2020;51(12):2996–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.001 Epub 2020 Oct 2. PMID: 33041019.
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.001
pubmed: 33041019