The Empirical Investigation Between Ethical Leadership and Knowledge-Hiding Behavior in Financial Service Sector: A Moderated-Mediated Model.

ethical climate ethical leadership knowledge hiding behavior meaningful work services sector

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 20 10 2021
accepted: 22 11 2021
entrez: 3 1 2022
pubmed: 4 1 2022
medline: 4 1 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This study aimed to investigate the impact of ethical leadership on knowledge-hiding behavior of the employees working in the financial services sector under the mediating role of meaningful at work and moderating role of ethical climate. For this purpose, data were collected from two hundred and fifteen employees of financial services providing organizations. The already-established scales were followed to develop an instrument that was used to obtain responses from the respondents. Collected data were analyzed by applying the structural equation modeling through Smart PLS and Process Macro. The results indicate that ethical leadership and meaningful work (MW) reduce knowledge-hiding behavior of employees at work, while ethical leadership positively impacts the influential work of employees at the workplace. Further, the relationship between ethical leadership and knowledge-hiding behavior is partially mediated by MW. Similarly, ethical climate moderated the relationship between ethical leadership and knowledge-hiding behavior. This research makes valuable contributions to the existing literature on leadership and knowledge management. From a practical point of view, this study stresses that managers at work should promote ethical leadership styles to promote MW, which will reduce knowledge hiding. Thus, in this way, it will enhance the innovation and creativity within organizational circuits. The limitations and future directions of this study are also listed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34975699
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.798631
pmc: PMC8716561
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

798631

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Mohsin, Zhu, Wang, Naseem and Nazam.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Oct 07;14:1603-1613
pubmed: 34675701
Nurs Outlook. 2020 Jan - Feb;68(1):104-113
pubmed: 31427079
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 25;10:2403
pubmed: 31708841
J Psychol. 2012 Jul-Aug;146(4):393-415
pubmed: 22808687
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 11;11:994
pubmed: 32595551
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 10;10:2800
pubmed: 31920843
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 10;12:626934
pubmed: 33643158
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 12;9:960
pubmed: 29951022

Auteurs

Muhammad Mohsin (M)

School of Business, Hunan University of Humanities, Science and Technology (HUHST), Loudi, China.

Qiang Zhu (Q)

School of Business, Hunan University of Humanities, Science and Technology (HUHST), Loudi, China.

Xiaojun Wang (X)

School of Business, Hunan University of Humanities, Science and Technology (HUHST), Loudi, China.

Sobia Naseem (S)

School of Economics and Management, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, China.

Muhammad Nazam (M)

Institute of Business Management Sciences, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Classifications MeSH