The mental health crisis during the COVID-19 pandemic in older adults and the role of physical distancing interventions and social protection measures in 26 European countries.

COVID-19 Containment measures Europe Mental health Older adults Physical distancing Social protection Socioeconomic inequalities

Journal

SSM - population health
ISSN: 2352-8273
Titre abrégé: SSM Popul Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101678841

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2022
Historique:
received: 03 08 2021
revised: 23 12 2021
accepted: 23 12 2021
pubmed: 4 1 2022
medline: 4 1 2022
entrez: 3 1 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The COVID-19 pandemic and associated policy responses, such as physical distancing interventions, pose risks to mental health that could be mitigated by social support systems. We examine associations between changes in mental health in the population aged 50 years and older in Europe and stringency of pandemic responses and social protection. We analysed data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe: n = 50,278 individuals aged 50 years and older in 26 European countries between June and August 2020. Linear multivariable regression models were used to evaluate potential risk factors for deterioration in self-reported mental health and investigate whether social protection systems mitigate it. Across the European Union, 28.1% (95% CI:27.1-29.2) of participants reported worsening mental health since the beginning of the pandemic, ranging from 16.1% in Slovakia to 54.8% in Portugal. Factors associated with increased risk of deterioration included: being female (12.7 percentage points (ppt), 95%CI:9.2-16.2); experiencing unmet healthcare needs during the pandemic (14.6 ppt, 95%CI:11.2-18.1); job loss during the pandemic (6.2 ppt, 95%CI:1.1-11.8); and financial hardship (5.1 ppt, 95%CI:2.9-7.2). Greater stringency of physical distancing measures in countries was associated with worsening mental health (0.2 ppt per each one point increase on a stringency index, 95% CI:0.09-0.4); however, country-level pre-pandemic expenditures on various social protection packages was associated with decreased probability of worsening mental health (-1.3 ppt, 95%CI: 0.3 to -2.3 per €1,000 increase in health care expenditures per capita and, among the unemployed, -3.8 ppt, 95%CI: 1.6 to -2.4 per €100 increase in unemployment expenditure per capita). The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with substantial mental health deterioration exhibiting social inequalities. Adverse mental health has been exacerbated by policy responses to the pandemic regulating physical distancing, but social protection expenditure might have helped mitigate the impact. Strengthening social protection systems might render the mental health of the population more resilient to the consequences of crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The COVID-19 pandemic and associated policy responses, such as physical distancing interventions, pose risks to mental health that could be mitigated by social support systems. We examine associations between changes in mental health in the population aged 50 years and older in Europe and stringency of pandemic responses and social protection.
METHODS METHODS
We analysed data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe: n = 50,278 individuals aged 50 years and older in 26 European countries between June and August 2020. Linear multivariable regression models were used to evaluate potential risk factors for deterioration in self-reported mental health and investigate whether social protection systems mitigate it.
RESULTS RESULTS
Across the European Union, 28.1% (95% CI:27.1-29.2) of participants reported worsening mental health since the beginning of the pandemic, ranging from 16.1% in Slovakia to 54.8% in Portugal. Factors associated with increased risk of deterioration included: being female (12.7 percentage points (ppt), 95%CI:9.2-16.2); experiencing unmet healthcare needs during the pandemic (14.6 ppt, 95%CI:11.2-18.1); job loss during the pandemic (6.2 ppt, 95%CI:1.1-11.8); and financial hardship (5.1 ppt, 95%CI:2.9-7.2). Greater stringency of physical distancing measures in countries was associated with worsening mental health (0.2 ppt per each one point increase on a stringency index, 95% CI:0.09-0.4); however, country-level pre-pandemic expenditures on various social protection packages was associated with decreased probability of worsening mental health (-1.3 ppt, 95%CI: 0.3 to -2.3 per €1,000 increase in health care expenditures per capita and, among the unemployed, -3.8 ppt, 95%CI: 1.6 to -2.4 per €100 increase in unemployment expenditure per capita).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with substantial mental health deterioration exhibiting social inequalities. Adverse mental health has been exacerbated by policy responses to the pandemic regulating physical distancing, but social protection expenditure might have helped mitigate the impact. Strengthening social protection systems might render the mental health of the population more resilient to the consequences of crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34977323
doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.101017
pii: S2352-8273(21)00292-5
pmc: PMC8713431
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

101017

Informations de copyright

© 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

None.

Références

Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 May;8(5):416-427
pubmed: 33836148
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0244630
pubmed: 33370404
JAMA. 2020 Dec 8;324(22):2253-2254
pubmed: 33216114
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jan;269:113557
pubmed: 33308909
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538
pubmed: 33686204
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;8(2):130-140
pubmed: 33181098
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;7(6):547-560
pubmed: 32304649
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Feb 17;76(3):e99-e103
pubmed: 32672332
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;8(2):141-149
pubmed: 33308420
BMJ. 2020 Mar 13;368:m1052
pubmed: 32169830
Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Oct;89:531-542
pubmed: 32485289
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2019686
pubmed: 32876685
J Affect Disord. 2020 Dec 1;277:55-64
pubmed: 32799105
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10):
pubmed: 33122298
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;8(2):121-129
pubmed: 33306975
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 May;20(5):533-534
pubmed: 32087114
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 6;15(10):e0240011
pubmed: 33022023
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 16;11(1):5958
pubmed: 33727655
Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Jul;87:172-176
pubmed: 32405150
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;42(4):992-1001
pubmed: 23778574
Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):912-920
pubmed: 32112714
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jul;7(7):567-568
pubmed: 32502467
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;7(10):883-892
pubmed: 32707037
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;7(8):673-681
pubmed: 32711708
Health Policy Plan. 2018 Apr 1;33(3):355-367
pubmed: 29325025

Auteurs

Ana Mendez-Lopez (A)

Department of Preventive Medicine, Public Health and Microbiology, School of Medicine, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

David Stuckler (D)

Dondena Centre for Research on Social Dynamics and Public Policy and Department of Social & Political Sciences, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.

Martin McKee (M)

Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

Jan C Semenza (JC)

Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, University of Heidelberg, Germany.

Jeffrey V Lazarus (JV)

Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Classifications MeSH