A Systolic Blood Pressure of 100 mm Hg Is Optimal for Optimal Visualization in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in the Beach-Chair Position.


Journal

Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation
ISSN: 2666-061X
Titre abrégé: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101765256

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Historique:
received: 14 04 2021
accepted: 02 09 2021
entrez: 3 1 2022
pubmed: 4 1 2022
medline: 4 1 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To investigate the relationship between visualization and blood pressure during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) in the beach-chair position and to clarify the optimal blood pressure to maintain good visualization during surgery. One senior surgeon evaluated intraoperative visualization at the start of arthroscopy, at acromioplasty, at the refresh of the footprint on the greater tuberosity, at marrow vent creation in the footprint on the greater tuberosity, and at rotator cuff fixation. The evaluation grades were: 5, clear; 4, mild bleeding; 3, bleeding but operable; 2, poor visualization due to bleeding; and 1, inability to continue surgery due to massive bleeding. During ARCR, an arterial line was inserted, and blood pressure was measured continuously. The relationship between visualization and blood pressure was analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed with evaluation grades 5 and 4 as the good visualization group and the other evaluation grades as the poor visualization group. Visualization assessment and systolic/diastolic blood pressure were associated at the start of arthroscopy ( Good visualization during ARCR in the beach-chair position was significantly associated with blood pressure. An optimal blood pressure resulting in good visualization that would not cause excessive hypotension during ARCR surgery in the beach-chair position might be a systolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg. III, prospective, nonrandomized, observational study.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34977644
doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.09.003
pii: S2666-061X(21)00164-4
pmc: PMC8689269
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e1883-e1889

Informations de copyright

© 2021 by the Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Références

Orthopedics. 2009 Apr;32(4):
pubmed: 19388618
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Mar-Apr;17(2):226-30
pubmed: 18207431
J Clin Anesth. 2005 Sep;17(6):463-9
pubmed: 16171668
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Dec;27(12):2129-2138
pubmed: 30322751
Arthroscopy. 1988;4(4):256-9
pubmed: 3233114
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Jan;24(1):133-7
pubmed: 25200919

Auteurs

Megumi Shingu (M)

Yoshioka Hospital, Yamagata, Japan.
Department of Fundamental Nursing, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine School of Nursing, Yamagata, Japan.

Nariyuki Mura (N)

Yoshioka Hospital, Yamagata, Japan.
Yamagata Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Yamagata, Japan.

Tomohiro Uno (T)

Yoshioka Hospital, Yamagata, Japan.

Ryuta Oishi (R)

Yoshioka Hospital, Yamagata, Japan.

Tadashi Koseki (T)

Yoshioka Hospital, Yamagata, Japan.

Kaori Sakurada (K)

Department of Fundamental Nursing, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine School of Nursing, Yamagata, Japan.

Classifications MeSH