Neural correlates of syntactic comprehension: A longitudinal study.
Broca’s area
Language comprehension
Lesion-symptom mapping
Sentence processing
Syntax
Journal
Brain and language
ISSN: 1090-2155
Titre abrégé: Brain Lang
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7506220
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2022
02 2022
Historique:
received:
07
04
2021
revised:
18
12
2021
accepted:
20
12
2021
pubmed:
4
1
2022
medline:
26
4
2022
entrez:
3
1
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Broca's area is frequently implicated in sentence comprehension but its specific role is debated. Most lesion studies have investigated deficits at the chronic stage. We aimed (1) to use acute imaging to predict which left hemisphere stroke patients will recover sentence comprehension; and (2) to better understand the role of Broca's area in sentence comprehension by investigating acute deficits prior to functional reorganization. We assessed comprehension of canonical and noncanonical sentences in 15 patients with left hemisphere stroke at acute and chronic stages. LASSO regression was used to conduct lesion symptom mapping analyses. Patients with more severe word-level comprehension deficits and a greater proportion of damage to supramarginal gyrus and superior longitudinal fasciculus were likely to experience acute deficits prior to functional reorganization. Broca's area was only implicated in chronic deficits. We propose that when temporoparietal regions are damaged, intact Broca's area can support syntactic processing after functional reorganization occurs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34979477
pii: S0093-934X(21)00162-0
doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2021.105068
pmc: PMC9232253
mid: NIHMS1769900
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
105068Subventions
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R01 DC005375
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R01 DC015466
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Jul;23(7):1664-80
pubmed: 20617890
Aphasiology. 2022;36(6):732-760
pubmed: 35832655
Aphasiology. 2002;16(9):873-883
pubmed: 30906100
J Neurosci. 2010 Sep 1;30(35):11558-64
pubmed: 20810877
Neuroimage. 2008 Apr 1;40(2):570-582
pubmed: 18255316
Neuropsychol Rev. 2007 Jun;17(2):157-77
pubmed: 17525865
Brain Lang. 2005 Jul;94(1):43-53
pubmed: 15896382
J Psycholinguist Res. 2002 Sep;31(5):503-29
pubmed: 12528429
Cortex. 2019 Dec;121:147-168
pubmed: 31627014
Brain Lang. 1989 May;36(4):625-50
pubmed: 2470464
Brain. 2006 Jun;129(Pt 6):1371-84
pubmed: 16638796
J Stat Softw. 2010;33(1):1-22
pubmed: 20808728
J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Feb;32(2):256-271
pubmed: 31596169
Brain Sci. 2013 Aug 02;3(3):1198-214
pubmed: 24961525
Neuroimage. 2012 Jul 2;61(3):613-21
pubmed: 22498656
Ann Neurol. 2001 Nov;50(5):561-6
pubmed: 11706960
Neuroimage. 2019 Apr 15;190:14-31
pubmed: 29175498
Cortex. 2017 Jul;92:249-260
pubmed: 28525836
Cortex. 2012 Nov-Dec;48(10):1288-97
pubmed: 22079684
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Sep;48(11):3211-27
pubmed: 20603138
Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Oct;17(2):73-88
pubmed: 12353242
Neuroimage. 2004 May;22(1):11-21
pubmed: 15109993
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Apr;13(4):175-81
pubmed: 19223226
Cereb Cortex. 2020 Mar 14;30(3):1481-1498
pubmed: 31670779
Hum Brain Mapp. 2000 Feb;9(2):65-71
pubmed: 10680763
Neuroimage. 2017 Mar 1;148:254-263
pubmed: 28069544
Stroke. 2012 Nov;43(11):2931-5
pubmed: 22935400
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Jul;19(7):1081-8
pubmed: 17583985
Neuroimage. 2012 Jul 16;61(4):957-65
pubmed: 22440645
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 01;(6):CD000425
pubmed: 27245310
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Jan;24(1):212-22
pubmed: 21861679
Lancet Neurol. 2010 Sep;9(9):895-905
pubmed: 20723846
Neural Regen Res. 2016 Oct;11(10):1591-1594
pubmed: 27904489
Brain. 2018 Mar 1;141(3):848-862
pubmed: 29360947
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2018;33(5):547-562
pubmed: 29904641
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Oct;22(10):870-882
pubmed: 30266147
Neuroimage. 2005 May 15;26(1):221-33
pubmed: 15862222
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Feb 13;13:27
pubmed: 30814941
Brain. 2017 Nov 1;140(11):3039-3054
pubmed: 29053773
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 May;16(5):262-8
pubmed: 22516238
Brain Sci. 2021 Apr 13;11(4):
pubmed: 33924446
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2002 Sep 1;19(6):523-34
pubmed: 20957552
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Jun 1;40(8):2275-2304
pubmed: 30689268
Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 Feb;24(2):79-91
pubmed: 15455462
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Dec;107:9-24
pubmed: 29061490
Cortex. 2019 Nov;120:394-418
pubmed: 31419597
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2013;30(7-8):454-75
pubmed: 24472056
Cereb Cortex. 2015 Dec;25(12):4689-96
pubmed: 25016386
Front Hum Neurosci. 2008 Oct 06;2:14
pubmed: 18958214
Brain Lang. 2001 Feb;76(2):158-84
pubmed: 11254256
Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Oct;34(10):2715-23
pubmed: 22522937
Stroke. 2014 Feb;45(2):545-52
pubmed: 24309584
Stroke. 2010 Feb;41(2):325-30
pubmed: 20044520
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jun 09;9:316
pubmed: 26106314
Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Oct 1;6(10):416-421
pubmed: 12413574
Physiol Rev. 2011 Oct;91(4):1357-92
pubmed: 22013214
Brain Lang. 2006 Jul;98(1):74-88
pubmed: 16620944
Brain Lang. 1986 Jan;27(1):117-34
pubmed: 3947937
Cognition. 2004 May-Jun;92(1-2):145-77
pubmed: 15037129
Eur J Neurol. 2015 Feb;22(2):229-38, e13-6
pubmed: 25492161
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2005 Sep;5(3):263-81
pubmed: 16396089
Curr Biol. 2010 May 25;20(10):964-8
pubmed: 20451381
J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Feb;30(2):234-255
pubmed: 29064339
Neurology. 1978 Apr;28(4):311-24
pubmed: 565019
Cortex. 2017 Mar;88:106-123
pubmed: 28088041
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;15(6):477-86
pubmed: 17545448
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2022 Sep 29;3(4):575-598
pubmed: 37215341
Cognition. 1996 Mar;58(3):289-308
pubmed: 8871341
Brain. 2002 May;125(Pt 5):1094-104
pubmed: 11960898
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct;25(5):1682-1694
pubmed: 28940045
Behav Brain Sci. 2000 Feb;23(1):1-21; discussion 21-71
pubmed: 11303337
Clin Rehabil. 2007 Oct;21(10):885-94
pubmed: 17981847
J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Apr;16(3):374-81
pubmed: 15072673
Neural Plast. 2017;2017:2361691
pubmed: 28357141