Pre-surgery supportive and goal-oriented strategies are associated with lower post-surgery perceived distress in women diagnosed with breast cancer.
Breast cancer surgery
Coping strategies
Distress
Factor analysis
Multiple linear regression
Pre-post
Journal
BMC psychology
ISSN: 2050-7283
Titre abrégé: BMC Psychol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101627676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Jan 2022
03 Jan 2022
Historique:
received:
18
09
2021
accepted:
20
12
2021
entrez:
4
1
2022
pubmed:
5
1
2022
medline:
6
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Psycho-oncology literature pointed out that individual health outcomes may depend on patients' propensity to adopt approach or, conversely, avoidant coping strategies. Nevertheless, coping factors associated with postoperative distress remain unclear, unfolding the lack of tailored procedures to help breast cancer patients manage the psychological burden of scheduled surgery. In view of this, the present study aimed at investigating: 1. pre-/post-surgery distress variations occurring among women diagnosed with breast cancer; 2. the predictivity of approach and avoidant coping strategies and factors in affecting post-surgery perceived distress. N = 150 patients (mean age = 59.37; SD = ± 13.23) scheduled for breast cancer surgery were administered a screening protocol consisting of the Distress Thermometer (DT) and the Brief-COPE. The DT was used to monitor patients' distress levels before and after surgery (± 7 days), whereas the Brief-COPE was adopted only preoperatively to evaluate patients' coping responses to the forthcoming surgical intervention. Non-parametric tests allowed for the detection of pre-/post-surgery variations in patients' perceived distress. Factor analysis involved the extraction and rotation of principal components derived from the Brief-COPE strategies. The predictivity of such coping factors was investigated through multiple regression (Backward Elimination). The Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test yielded a significant variation in DT mean scores (TW = -5,68 < -zα/2 = -1,96; p < .001) indicative of lower perceived distress following surgery. The four coping factors extracted and Varimax-rotated were, respectively: 1. cognitive processing (i.e., planning + acceptance + active coping + positive reframing); 2. support provision (i.e., instrumental + emotional support); 3. emotion-oriented detachment (i.e., self-blame + behavioral disengagement + humor + denial); 4. goal-oriented detachment (i.e., self-distraction). Among these factors, support provision (B = .458; β = - .174; t = - 2.03; p = .045), encompassing two approach coping strategies, and goal-oriented detachment (B = .446; β = - .176; t = - 2.06; p = .042), consisting of one avoidant strategy, were strongly related to post-surgery distress reduction. The present investigation revealed that the pre-surgery adoption of supportive and goal-oriented strategies led to postoperative distress reduction among breast cancer patients. These findings highlight the importance of timely psychosocial screening and proactive interventions in order to improve patients' recovery and prognosis.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Psycho-oncology literature pointed out that individual health outcomes may depend on patients' propensity to adopt approach or, conversely, avoidant coping strategies. Nevertheless, coping factors associated with postoperative distress remain unclear, unfolding the lack of tailored procedures to help breast cancer patients manage the psychological burden of scheduled surgery. In view of this, the present study aimed at investigating: 1. pre-/post-surgery distress variations occurring among women diagnosed with breast cancer; 2. the predictivity of approach and avoidant coping strategies and factors in affecting post-surgery perceived distress.
METHODS
METHODS
N = 150 patients (mean age = 59.37; SD = ± 13.23) scheduled for breast cancer surgery were administered a screening protocol consisting of the Distress Thermometer (DT) and the Brief-COPE. The DT was used to monitor patients' distress levels before and after surgery (± 7 days), whereas the Brief-COPE was adopted only preoperatively to evaluate patients' coping responses to the forthcoming surgical intervention. Non-parametric tests allowed for the detection of pre-/post-surgery variations in patients' perceived distress. Factor analysis involved the extraction and rotation of principal components derived from the Brief-COPE strategies. The predictivity of such coping factors was investigated through multiple regression (Backward Elimination).
RESULTS
RESULTS
The Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test yielded a significant variation in DT mean scores (TW = -5,68 < -zα/2 = -1,96; p < .001) indicative of lower perceived distress following surgery. The four coping factors extracted and Varimax-rotated were, respectively: 1. cognitive processing (i.e., planning + acceptance + active coping + positive reframing); 2. support provision (i.e., instrumental + emotional support); 3. emotion-oriented detachment (i.e., self-blame + behavioral disengagement + humor + denial); 4. goal-oriented detachment (i.e., self-distraction). Among these factors, support provision (B = .458; β = - .174; t = - 2.03; p = .045), encompassing two approach coping strategies, and goal-oriented detachment (B = .446; β = - .176; t = - 2.06; p = .042), consisting of one avoidant strategy, were strongly related to post-surgery distress reduction.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The present investigation revealed that the pre-surgery adoption of supportive and goal-oriented strategies led to postoperative distress reduction among breast cancer patients. These findings highlight the importance of timely psychosocial screening and proactive interventions in order to improve patients' recovery and prognosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34980291
doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00714-3
pii: 10.1186/s40359-021-00714-3
pmc: PMC8725323
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2017 May 01;44(3):329-336
pubmed: 29493167
Cancer. 1998 May 15;82(10):1904-8
pubmed: 9587123
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2021 Mar;28(1):16-30
pubmed: 31848927
Psychooncology. 2019 Apr;28(4):767-774
pubmed: 30720241
Cancer. 2019 Sep 1;125(17):3040-3049
pubmed: 31120575
J Geriatr Oncol. 2019 Mar;10(2):346-355
pubmed: 30078714
Clin Transl Oncol. 2021 Sep;23(9):1955-1960
pubmed: 33840046
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1998 Spring;10(2):230-1
pubmed: 9722327
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Jun 25;19(6):1661-1669
pubmed: 29938451
J Human Stress. 1975 Jun;1(2):37-44
pubmed: 1235113
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Dec;119:406-421
pubmed: 33086128
Psychooncology. 2017 Aug;26(8):1070-1079
pubmed: 27643482
Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec;31:26-32
pubmed: 31493647
Eur J Psychol. 2015 May 29;11(2):295-310
pubmed: 27247658
Am Psychol. 1986 Jul;41(7):813-9
pubmed: 3740641
J Affect Disord. 2009 Apr;114(1-3):193-9
pubmed: 18757101
Int J Behav Med. 1997;4(1):92-100
pubmed: 16250744
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008 Dec;12(5):418-24
pubmed: 18842456
J Health Psychol. 2019 Nov;24(13):1897-1908
pubmed: 28810456
Br J Health Psychol. 2010 Sep;15(Pt 3):479-510
pubmed: 19840495
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 28;10(19):
pubmed: 34640484
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018 May 23;38:813-821
pubmed: 30231391
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. ;18(1):215-224
pubmed: 28240522
J Pain. 2018 Dec;19(12):1367-1383
pubmed: 29966772
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2019 Nov;64(6):713-724
pubmed: 31322834
Psychooncology. 2018 Sep;27(9):2296-2298
pubmed: 29886576
Florence Nightingale J Nurs. 2020 Jul 3;28(2):174-183
pubmed: 34263196
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2020 Mar-Apr;38(2):156-170
pubmed: 31625826
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Feb;20:97-105
pubmed: 26187660
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Feb;56(2):267-83
pubmed: 2926629
Support Care Cancer. 2005 Aug;13(8):600-6
pubmed: 15761700
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2018 Aug 3;31(1):22
pubmed: 32026069
BMC Psychol. 2021 Feb 8;9(1):26
pubmed: 33557956
BMC Cancer. 2020 Aug 13;20(1):758
pubmed: 32791959
J Behav Med. 2012 Jun;35(3):253-61
pubmed: 21660588
Stress Health. 2017 Dec;33(5):549-557
pubmed: 28052491
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Apr;21:205-11
pubmed: 26521054
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec 9;18(1):326
pubmed: 33298095
J Adv Nurs. 2010 Jan;66(1):149-58
pubmed: 20423441
Behav Res Ther. 2019 Oct;121:103442
pubmed: 31430689
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2019 Mar;10(2):175-179
pubmed: 31538028
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Jan;66(1):184-95
pubmed: 8126648
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015;862:231-42
pubmed: 26059939
Cancer Nurs. 2020 Jan/Feb;43(1):E30-E37
pubmed: 30346331
Biol Res. 2017 Oct 2;50(1):33
pubmed: 28969709
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2018 Aug;35:85-91
pubmed: 30057089
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 26;10:618
pubmed: 30984067
Womens Health (Lond). 2018 Jan-Dec;14:1745505718756381
pubmed: 29409399
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 25;9(11):e112733
pubmed: 25423095
Cancer. 2013 May 1;119(9):1714-21
pubmed: 23423789