Predictive and Therapeutic Implications of a Novel PLCγ1/SHP2-Driven Mechanism of Cetuximab Resistance in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Animals
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Cetuximab
/ pharmacology
Colonic Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
ErbB Receptors
/ genetics
Humans
Mutation
Phospholipase C gamma
/ genetics
Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 11
/ metabolism
Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)
Rectal Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Retrospective Studies
Zebrafish
Journal
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research
ISSN: 1557-3265
Titre abrégé: Clin Cancer Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9502500
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 03 2022
15 03 2022
Historique:
received:
31
05
2021
revised:
14
11
2021
accepted:
27
12
2021
pubmed:
5
1
2022
medline:
16
4
2022
entrez:
4
1
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cetuximab is an EGFR-targeted therapy approved for the treatment of RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, about 60% of these patients show innate resistance to cetuximab. To increase cetuximab efficacy, it is crucial to successfully identify responder patients, as well as to develop new therapeutic approaches to overcome cetuximab resistance. We evaluated the value of EGFR effector phospholipase C gamma 1 (PLCγ1) in predicting cetuximab responses, by analyzing progression-free survival (PFS) of a multicentric retrospective cohort of 94 treated patients with mCRC (log-rank test and Cox regression model). Furthermore, we used in vitro and zebrafish xenotransplant models to identify and target the mechanism behind PLCγ1-mediated resistance to cetuximab. In this study, levels of PLCγ1 were found increased in RAS WT tumors and were able to predict cetuximab responses in clinical samples and in vitro and in vivo models. Mechanistically, PLCγ1 expression was found to bypass cetuximab-dependent EGFR inhibition by activating ERK and AKT pathways. This novel resistance mechanism involves a noncatalytic role of PLCγ1 SH2 tandem domains in the propagation of downstream signaling via SH2-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase 2 (SHP2). Accordingly, SHP2 inhibition sensitizes PLCγ1-resistant cells to cetuximab. Our discoveries reveal the potential of PLCγ1 as a predictive biomarker for cetuximab responses and suggest an alternative therapeutic approach to circumvent PLCγ1-mediated resistance to cetuximab in patients with RAS WT mCRC. In this way, this work contributes to the development of novel strategies in the medical management and treatment of patients with mCRC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34980600
pii: 1078-0432.CCR-21-1992
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1992
pmc: PMC9365369
doi:
Substances chimiques
ErbB Receptors
EC 2.7.10.1
Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 11
EC 3.1.3.48
Phospholipase C gamma
EC 3.1.4.3
Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)
EC 3.6.5.2
Cetuximab
PQX0D8J21J
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1203-1216Subventions
Organisme : Investigador FCT- Fundação para a Ciência e Technologia
ID : IF/00409/2014
Organisme : Fundação para a Ciência e Technologia
ID : SFRH/BD/139138/2018
Informations de copyright
©2022 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.
Références
Mol Ther. 2013 Jan;21(1):91-100
pubmed: 22990672
N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 13;358(11):1160-74
pubmed: 18337605
Nat Genet. 2014 Apr;46(4):376-379
pubmed: 24633157
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Feb 1;20(3):744-53
pubmed: 24218517
Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017;44(3):1038-1050
pubmed: 29179214
Oncotarget. 2015 Nov 3;6(34):36418-25
pubmed: 26474454
Bioinformatics. 2010 Jan 1;26(1):139-40
pubmed: 19910308
Dev Cell. 2010 May 18;18(5):750-62
pubmed: 20493809
Mol Cell Biol. 2003 Nov;23(21):7875-86
pubmed: 14560030
Cell. 2016 Jul 28;166(3):740-754
pubmed: 27397505
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007 Feb 16;353(3):611-6
pubmed: 17196935
Nature. 2019 May;569(7757):503-508
pubmed: 31068700
Cell. 2004 Jan 23;116(2):191-203
pubmed: 14744431
Cancer Res. 2008 Mar 15;68(6):1953-61
pubmed: 18339877
Nature. 2012 Mar 28;483(7391):603-7
pubmed: 22460905
Curr Pharm Des. 2018;24(32):3767-3777
pubmed: 30398108
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Aug;11(8):753-62
pubmed: 20619739
N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 23;359(17):1757-65
pubmed: 18946061
J Cell Sci. 2005 Jun 15;118(Pt 12):2695-706
pubmed: 15944397
Ann Oncol. 2015 Jan;26(1):13-21
pubmed: 25115304
Ann Oncol. 2005 Jan;16(1):102-8
pubmed: 15598946
Arch Biochem Biophys. 1997 Sep 1;345(1):103-10
pubmed: 9281317
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010 Jun 25;397(2):296-300
pubmed: 20510673
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 18;109(51):21046-51
pubmed: 23213241
Nat Rev Cancer. 2020 May;20(5):263-273
pubmed: 32251397
Semin Cancer Biol. 2001 Apr;11(2):105-17
pubmed: 11322830
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010 Aug 6;398(4):719-22
pubmed: 20621058
Nat Commun. 2019 May 16;10(1):2198
pubmed: 31097696
Gastroenterology. 2014 Feb;146(2):461-72.e6
pubmed: 24120473
Oncotarget. 2015 Sep 8;6(26):22179-90
pubmed: 26109429
Mol Biol Cell. 1998 Apr;9(4):749-57
pubmed: 9529375
Nature. 2012 Jul 18;487(7407):330-7
pubmed: 22810696
J Cell Physiol. 2004 May;199(2):227-36
pubmed: 15040005
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Sep 26;114(39):E8234-E8243
pubmed: 28835536
Cancer. 1994 Jan 1;73(1):36-41
pubmed: 8275435
Cancer Res. 2003 Sep 1;63(17):5629-35
pubmed: 14500405
J Clin Pathol. 1999 Jul;52(7):517-20
pubmed: 10605405
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2014 Mar;13(1):3-4
pubmed: 24373734
Blood. 2014 Mar 27;123(13):2034-43
pubmed: 24497536
Structure. 2012 Dec 5;20(12):2062-75
pubmed: 23063561
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Mar 20;23(9):1803-10
pubmed: 15677699
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Nov 20;25(33):5225-32
pubmed: 18024868
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Nov 1;28(31):4697-705
pubmed: 20921465
Nature. 2015 Dec 3;528(7580):84-7
pubmed: 26570998
Cell. 1989 Jun 30;57(7):1109-22
pubmed: 2472219
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Apr 1;94(7):2999-3003
pubmed: 9096335
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1110:113-131
pubmed: 30623369
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jun 12;370(24):2286-94
pubmed: 24869598