How COVID-19 affects the use of evidence informed policymaking among iranian health policymakers and managers.

COVID-19 Evidence informed Policy making Health managers Health policymakers Iran Knowledge Broker Knowledge Translation Exchange

Journal

Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique
ISSN: 0778-7367
Titre abrégé: Arch Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9208826

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Jan 2022
Historique:
received: 21 05 2021
accepted: 08 12 2021
entrez: 5 1 2022
pubmed: 6 1 2022
medline: 6 1 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The COVID-19 pandemic increased the need for new valid scientific evidence to support urgent clinical and policy decision making; as well as improved processes for the rapid synthesis, uptake and application of that evidence. Evidence informed policymaking (EIPM) can be considered as a way to access and use the results of evidence in practice. This study aimed to determine what effects COVID-19 had on the way Iranian health managers and policymakers use evidence in their decisions. This study was conducted in 2021 applying a qualitative research design. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews. Thirty health care managers, policy makers and medical university faculty members were recruited as the study participants, initially via a purposive sample, followed by snowballing. A conventional content analysis presented by Hsieh and Shannon (2005) was applied for data analysis. Ten main themes emerged from the data including: 1) roles and duties of knowledge brokers (KBs); 2-5) the roles, benefits, barriers and necessities of applying Knowledge Translation Exchange (KTE) tools; 6-8) the facilitators, benefits and barriers to the application of evidence during COVID-19; 9) challenges of rapid evidence production evidence during COVID-19 and 10) consequences of not applying evidence during COVID-19. According to the present conceptual framework, KBs act as an intermediator between the large amounts of knowledge produced and decision makers. KTE tools should be applied to enhance EIPM during COVID-19. Attention should be paid to the facilitators, barriers, benefits and necessities of evidence application during COVID-19 to avoid negative consequences for the health system. Results of this study show that developing KTE tools and activating KBs can be among the main strategies to produce applied actionable messages for policymakers to move toward EIPM; and that this applies even when rapid decision making is required, such as during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is strongly recommended to reinforce the local capacities through supporting scientific networks and relationships between research centers and local and national policymakers. At the same time, attention to local barriers to and facilitators of the application of evidence while facing a pandemic can pave the way to better identification of health system`s problems and rapid responses.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The COVID-19 pandemic increased the need for new valid scientific evidence to support urgent clinical and policy decision making; as well as improved processes for the rapid synthesis, uptake and application of that evidence. Evidence informed policymaking (EIPM) can be considered as a way to access and use the results of evidence in practice. This study aimed to determine what effects COVID-19 had on the way Iranian health managers and policymakers use evidence in their decisions.
METHODS METHODS
This study was conducted in 2021 applying a qualitative research design. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews. Thirty health care managers, policy makers and medical university faculty members were recruited as the study participants, initially via a purposive sample, followed by snowballing. A conventional content analysis presented by Hsieh and Shannon (2005) was applied for data analysis.
RESULTS RESULTS
Ten main themes emerged from the data including: 1) roles and duties of knowledge brokers (KBs); 2-5) the roles, benefits, barriers and necessities of applying Knowledge Translation Exchange (KTE) tools; 6-8) the facilitators, benefits and barriers to the application of evidence during COVID-19; 9) challenges of rapid evidence production evidence during COVID-19 and 10) consequences of not applying evidence during COVID-19. According to the present conceptual framework, KBs act as an intermediator between the large amounts of knowledge produced and decision makers. KTE tools should be applied to enhance EIPM during COVID-19. Attention should be paid to the facilitators, barriers, benefits and necessities of evidence application during COVID-19 to avoid negative consequences for the health system.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Results of this study show that developing KTE tools and activating KBs can be among the main strategies to produce applied actionable messages for policymakers to move toward EIPM; and that this applies even when rapid decision making is required, such as during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is strongly recommended to reinforce the local capacities through supporting scientific networks and relationships between research centers and local and national policymakers. At the same time, attention to local barriers to and facilitators of the application of evidence while facing a pandemic can pave the way to better identification of health system`s problems and rapid responses.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34983653
doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00757-3
pii: 10.1186/s13690-021-00757-3
pmc: PMC8727233
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

16

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

Health Res Policy Syst. 2012 May 06;10:15
pubmed: 22559007
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Jan 18;19(1):5
pubmed: 33461564
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2019 Aug;144-145:78-83
pubmed: 31201124
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Jun 3;18(1):58
pubmed: 32493339
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 17;18(1):120
pubmed: 29454350
Implement Sci. 2009 Apr 27;4:23
pubmed: 19397820
PLoS Med. 2009 Nov;6(11):e1000141
pubmed: 19936223
Health Res Policy Syst. 2009 Dec 16;7 Suppl 1:S14
pubmed: 20018104
Bull World Health Organ. 2014 Jan 1;92(1):20-8
pubmed: 24391297
Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 30;10(1):42
pubmed: 33516269
Am J Public Health. 2018 Nov;108(S5):S383-S386
pubmed: 30422693
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2018 Sep;28(5):665-680
pubmed: 30607082
Eur J Clin Invest. 2020 Mar 23;:e13223
pubmed: 32202659
Health Res Policy Syst. 2012 Oct 03;10:31
pubmed: 23034056
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jan 03;14:2
pubmed: 24383766
Euro Surveill. 2020 May;25(19):
pubmed: 32431291
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Feb;6(2):
pubmed: 33597281

Auteurs

Peivand Bastani (P)

Health Human Resources Research Center, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Jamshid Bahmaei (J)

Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. jamshid_b1388@yahoo.com.

Ebrahim Kharazinejad (E)

Department of Anatomical Sciences, Abadan University of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Iran.

Mahnaz Samadbeik (M)

Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran.
Centre for Online Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Zhanming Liang (Z)

College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, Division of Tropic Health and Medicine, James Cook University, 4811, Townsville, Qld, Australia.

Carmen Huckel Schneider (CH)

Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Classifications MeSH