Retrospective Analysis of Training Intensity Distribution Based on Race Pace Versus Physiological Benchmarks in Highly Trained Sprint Kayakers.
Endurance training
Polarized training
Pyramidal training
Sprint kayaking
Training zones
Upper-body sport
Journal
Sports medicine - open
ISSN: 2199-1170
Titre abrégé: Sports Med Open
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101662568
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Jan 2022
06 Jan 2022
Historique:
received:
05
08
2021
accepted:
14
11
2021
entrez:
6
1
2022
pubmed:
7
1
2022
medline:
7
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Research results on the training intensity distribution (TID) in endurance athletes are equivocal. This non-uniformity appears to be partially founded in the different quantification methods that are implemented. So far, TID research has solely focused on sports involving the lower-body muscles as prime movers (e.g. running). Sprint kayaking imposes high demands on the upper-body endurance capacity of the athlete. As there are structural and physiological differences between upper- and lower-body musculature, TID in kayaking should be different to lower-body dominant sports. Therefore, we aimed to compare the training intensity distribution during an 8-wk macrocycle in a group of highly trained sprint kayakers employing three different methods of training intensity quantification. Heart rate (HR) and velocity during on-water training of nine highly trained German sprint kayakers were recorded during the final 8 weeks of a competition period leading to the national championships. The fractional analysis of TID was based on three zones (Z) derived from either HR (TID TID The results show that the method of training intensity quantification substantially affects the fraction of TID in well-trained sprint kayakers. TID
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Research results on the training intensity distribution (TID) in endurance athletes are equivocal. This non-uniformity appears to be partially founded in the different quantification methods that are implemented. So far, TID research has solely focused on sports involving the lower-body muscles as prime movers (e.g. running). Sprint kayaking imposes high demands on the upper-body endurance capacity of the athlete. As there are structural and physiological differences between upper- and lower-body musculature, TID in kayaking should be different to lower-body dominant sports. Therefore, we aimed to compare the training intensity distribution during an 8-wk macrocycle in a group of highly trained sprint kayakers employing three different methods of training intensity quantification.
METHODS
METHODS
Heart rate (HR) and velocity during on-water training of nine highly trained German sprint kayakers were recorded during the final 8 weeks of a competition period leading to the national championships. The fractional analysis of TID was based on three zones (Z) derived from either HR (TID
RESULTS
RESULTS
TID
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The results show that the method of training intensity quantification substantially affects the fraction of TID in well-trained sprint kayakers. TID
Identifiants
pubmed: 34989918
doi: 10.1186/s40798-021-00382-y
pii: 10.1186/s40798-021-00382-y
pmc: PMC8738792
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Eur J Sport Sci. 2021 Jun;21(6):819-826
pubmed: 32449500
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Aug;50(8):1641-1648
pubmed: 29509644
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019 Nov 18;15(5):654-662
pubmed: 31743095
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018 Oct 1;13(9):1114-1121
pubmed: 29182410
Eur J Sport Sci. 2021 May;21(5):656-665
pubmed: 32538301
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2006 Feb;16(1):49-56
pubmed: 16430681
Front Physiol. 2014 Feb 04;5:33
pubmed: 24550842
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2007 Jun;47(2):191-6
pubmed: 17557057
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019 Oct 11;:1-5
pubmed: 31188692
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017 Oct;12(9):1232-1237
pubmed: 28253026
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1970;2(2):92-8
pubmed: 5523831
Front Physiol. 2015 Oct 27;6:295
pubmed: 26578968
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014 Jan;9(1):100-7
pubmed: 24408353
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998 Dec;30(12):1721-4
pubmed: 9861605
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011 Dec;21(6):e9-16
pubmed: 20500558
Sports Med. 2018 Apr;48(4):753-764
pubmed: 29189930
Front Physiol. 2018 Aug 02;9:1031
pubmed: 30116201
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2021 Aug 23;17(1):142–146
pubmed: 34426556
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002 Jun;34(6):1029-36
pubmed: 12048333
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2021 Feb 24;16(7):958-964
pubmed: 33626508
Sports Med. 2013 May;43(5):313-38
pubmed: 23539308
Jpn J Physiol. 2000 Jun;50(3):381-8
pubmed: 11016988
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2005 Nov;289(5):R1448-58
pubmed: 15919729
Front Physiol. 2016 Sep 30;7:426
pubmed: 27746738
Can J Appl Physiol. 1995 Dec;20(4):395-406
pubmed: 8563672
J Strength Cond Res. 2007 Aug;21(3):943-9
pubmed: 17685689
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Apr;26(4):941-6
pubmed: 22446667
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2008 Jun;3(2):207-18
pubmed: 19208929
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2010 Sep;5(3):276-91
pubmed: 20861519
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Mar;37(3):496-504
pubmed: 15741850
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019 Aug 26;:1244-1249
pubmed: 30860403
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014 Nov;9(6):1026-32
pubmed: 24700160
Front Physiol. 2017 Aug 02;8:515
pubmed: 28824440
Front Physiol. 2019 Jun 12;10:707
pubmed: 31249533
Front Physiol. 2017 Aug 14;8:564
pubmed: 28855871