Meta-review of implementation determinants for policies promoting healthy diet and physically active lifestyle: application of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
Barrier
Consolidated Framework For Implementation Research
Diet
Facilitator
Implementation
Physical activity
Policy
Sedentary behavior
Journal
Implementation science : IS
ISSN: 1748-5908
Titre abrégé: Implement Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101258411
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 01 2022
06 01 2022
Historique:
received:
07
01
2021
accepted:
29
11
2021
entrez:
7
1
2022
pubmed:
8
1
2022
medline:
3
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Although multiple systematic reviews indicate that various determinants (barriers and facilitators) occur in the implementation processes of policies promoting healthy diet, physical activity (PA), and sedentary behavior (SB) reduction, the overarching synthesis of such reviews is missing. Applying the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), this meta-review aims to (1) identify determinants that were systematically indicated as occurring during the implementation processes and (2) identify differences in the presence of determinants across reviews versus stakeholder documents on healthy diet/PA/SB policies, reviews/stakeholder documents addressing healthy diet policies versus PA/SB policies targeting any population/setting, and healthy diet/PA/SB policies focusing on school settings. A meta-review of published systematic scoping or realist reviews (k = 25) and stakeholder documents (k = 17) was conducted. Data from nine bibliographic databases and documentation of nine major stakeholders were systematically searched. Included reviews (72%) and stakeholder documents (100%) provided qualitative synthesis of original research on implementation determinants of policies promoting healthy diet or PA or SB reduction, and 28% of reviews provided some quantitative synthesis. Determinants were considered strongly supported if they were indicated by ≥ 60.0% of included reviews/stakeholder documents. Across the 26 CFIR-based implementation determinants, seven were supported by 66.7-76.2% of reviews/stakeholder documents. These determinants were cost, networking with other organizations/communities, external policies, structural characteristics of the setting, implementation climate, readiness for implementation, and knowledge/beliefs of involved individuals. Most frequently, published reviews provided support for inner setting and individual determinants, whereas stakeholder documents supported outer and inner setting implementation determinants. Comparisons between policies promoting healthy diet with PA/SB policies revealed shared support for only three implementation determinants: cost, implementation climate, and knowledge/beliefs. In the case of healthy diet/PA/SB policies targeting school settings, 14 out of 26 implementation determinants were strongly supported. The strongly supported (i.e., systematically indicated) determinants may guide policymakers and researchers who need to prioritize potential implementation determinants when planning and monitoring the implementation of respective policies. Future research should quantitatively assess the importance or role of determinants and test investigate associations between determinants and progress of implementation processes. PROSPERO, # CRD42019133341.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Although multiple systematic reviews indicate that various determinants (barriers and facilitators) occur in the implementation processes of policies promoting healthy diet, physical activity (PA), and sedentary behavior (SB) reduction, the overarching synthesis of such reviews is missing. Applying the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), this meta-review aims to (1) identify determinants that were systematically indicated as occurring during the implementation processes and (2) identify differences in the presence of determinants across reviews versus stakeholder documents on healthy diet/PA/SB policies, reviews/stakeholder documents addressing healthy diet policies versus PA/SB policies targeting any population/setting, and healthy diet/PA/SB policies focusing on school settings.
METHODS
A meta-review of published systematic scoping or realist reviews (k = 25) and stakeholder documents (k = 17) was conducted. Data from nine bibliographic databases and documentation of nine major stakeholders were systematically searched. Included reviews (72%) and stakeholder documents (100%) provided qualitative synthesis of original research on implementation determinants of policies promoting healthy diet or PA or SB reduction, and 28% of reviews provided some quantitative synthesis. Determinants were considered strongly supported if they were indicated by ≥ 60.0% of included reviews/stakeholder documents.
RESULTS
Across the 26 CFIR-based implementation determinants, seven were supported by 66.7-76.2% of reviews/stakeholder documents. These determinants were cost, networking with other organizations/communities, external policies, structural characteristics of the setting, implementation climate, readiness for implementation, and knowledge/beliefs of involved individuals. Most frequently, published reviews provided support for inner setting and individual determinants, whereas stakeholder documents supported outer and inner setting implementation determinants. Comparisons between policies promoting healthy diet with PA/SB policies revealed shared support for only three implementation determinants: cost, implementation climate, and knowledge/beliefs. In the case of healthy diet/PA/SB policies targeting school settings, 14 out of 26 implementation determinants were strongly supported.
CONCLUSIONS
The strongly supported (i.e., systematically indicated) determinants may guide policymakers and researchers who need to prioritize potential implementation determinants when planning and monitoring the implementation of respective policies. Future research should quantitatively assess the importance or role of determinants and test investigate associations between determinants and progress of implementation processes.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO, # CRD42019133341.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34991624
doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01176-2
pii: 10.1186/s13012-021-01176-2
pmc: PMC8734337
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
BMC Public Health. 2015 Dec 17;15:1250
pubmed: 26678996
Child Care Health Dev. 2012 May;38(3):321-31
pubmed: 21752064
Health Educ Behav. 2019 Apr;46(2):224-250
pubmed: 30173576
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jan 21;15:19
pubmed: 25604454
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 14;11:CD012439
pubmed: 30480770
Health Educ Res. 2006 Dec;21(6):806-25
pubmed: 17041020
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Oct;19(14):2643-53
pubmed: 27034196
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Jan 14;16(1):5
pubmed: 30642352
Public Health Nutr. 2013 Jun;16(6):1082-100
pubmed: 22850118
Implement Sci. 2017 Oct 30;12(1):124
pubmed: 29084566
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2015 Aug;39(4):303-4
pubmed: 26239576
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2019 Nov;11(3):353-381
pubmed: 31290288
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1006-12
pubmed: 19631508
Prev Med. 2013 Nov;57(5):448-55
pubmed: 23988494
Implement Sci. 2020 Jan 6;15(1):4
pubmed: 31906983
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 May;32(5):963-75
pubmed: 10795788
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Nov 21;16(1):108
pubmed: 31752885
JAMA. 2016 Oct 25;316(16):1645-1646
pubmed: 27668419
Implement Sci. 2017 Mar 27;12(1):41
pubmed: 28347322
Implement Sci. 2016 May 17;11:72
pubmed: 27189233
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 21;8(9):e019151
pubmed: 30244204
Prev Med. 2017 Dec;105:197-205
pubmed: 28965755
Implement Sci. 2017 Nov 3;12(1):125
pubmed: 29100551
Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Mar 14;13:16
pubmed: 25885055
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 21;10:53
pubmed: 25895742
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Dec 2;16(1):120
pubmed: 31791341
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 19;17(1):583
pubmed: 28629470
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 May 4;1:44
pubmed: 32885201
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Oct;37(4):340-57
pubmed: 19765507
Obes Rev. 2015 Jun;16(6):454-72
pubmed: 25824957
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Mar;83:37-47
pubmed: 27498377
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 08;14(10):
pubmed: 28991184
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143
pubmed: 30453902
Prev Med. 2015 Mar;72:95-115
pubmed: 25575800
Implement Sci. 2020 Mar 12;15(1):17
pubmed: 32164692
Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 07;4:50
pubmed: 19664226
BMC Public Health. 2013 Dec 17;13:1190
pubmed: 24341605
Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):327-50
pubmed: 18322790
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Sep 4;16(1):78
pubmed: 31484538
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:225-34
pubmed: 26092286
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1
pubmed: 25554246
Implement Sci. 2017 Jun 21;12(1):77
pubmed: 28637486
Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1923-1994
pubmed: 30496105
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Jan 07;13:E03
pubmed: 26741997
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 10;2:CD011779
pubmed: 32036618
Implement Sci. 2017 Feb 15;12(1):21
pubmed: 28202031
PLoS Med. 2005 Jul;2(7):e166
pubmed: 15913387
Implement Sci. 2018 Nov 22;13(1):143
pubmed: 30466450
J Phys Act Health. 2006 Feb;3(s1):S55-S76
pubmed: 28834525
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 19;7:33
pubmed: 22515663
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 19;13(10):e0205694
pubmed: 30339667
Prev Med. 2018 Feb;107:45-53
pubmed: 29155228