Time trends, associations and prevalence of blindness and vision loss due to glaucoma: an analysis of observational data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.
epidemiology
glaucoma
public health
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 01 2022
06 01 2022
Historique:
entrez:
7
1
2022
pubmed:
8
1
2022
medline:
16
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To estimate global prevalence of blindness and vision loss caused by glaucoma, and to evaluate the impact of socioeconomic factors on it. A population-based observational study. The prevalence of blindness and vision loss due to glaucoma were obtained from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 database. The Human Development Index (HDI), inequality-adjusted HDI and other socioeconomic data were acquired from international open databases. The prevalence of blindness and vision loss due to glaucoma by age, gender, subregion and Socio-Demographic Index (SDI) levels. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to explore the associations between the prevalence and socioeconomic indicators. The overall age-standardised prevalence of blindness and vision loss due to glaucoma worldwide was 81.5 per 100 000 in 1990 and 75.6 per 100 000 in 2017. In 2017, men had a higher age-standardised prevalence than women (6.07% vs 5.42%), and the worldwide prevalence increased with age, from 0.5 per 100 000 in the 45-49 year age group to 112.9 per 100 000 among those 70+. Eastern Mediterranean and African regions had the highest prevalence during the whole period, while the Americas region had the lowest prevalence. The prevalence was highest in low-SDI and low-income regions while lowest in high-SDI and high-income regions over the past 27 years. Multiple linear regression showed cataract surgery rate (β=-0.01, p=0.009), refractive error prevalence (β=-0.03, p=0.024) and expected years of schooling (β= -8.33, p=0.035) were associated with lower prevalence, while gross national income per capita (β=0.002, p<0.001) was associated with higher prevalence. Lower socioeconomic levels and worse access to eyecare services are associated with higher prevalence of glaucoma-related blindness and vision loss. These findings provide evidence for policy-makers that investments in these areas may reduce the burden of the leading cause of irreversible blindness.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34992115
pii: bmjopen-2021-053805
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053805
pmc: PMC8739070
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e053805Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Curr Eye Res. 2019 Apr;44(4):436-441
pubmed: 30433828
J Glaucoma. 2013 Apr-May;22(4):301-6
pubmed: 22134352
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr;62(4):482-6
pubmed: 24817749
Ophthalmology. 2011 Oct;118(10):1989-1994.e2
pubmed: 21684603
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 Apr;39(3):252-8
pubmed: 20973906
J Glaucoma. 2021 Jan 1;30(1):83-88
pubmed: 33031186
Lancet Glob Health. 2013 Dec;1(6):e339-49
pubmed: 25104599
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug 23;17(1):153
pubmed: 28835230
J Glob Health. 2017 Dec;7(2):020705
pubmed: 29302324
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2017 Mar;57:26-45
pubmed: 28039061
Ophthalmology. 2009 Feb;116(2):200-7
pubmed: 19019444
Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Mar;90(3):262-7
pubmed: 16488940
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan;31(1):15-22
pubmed: 31688225
Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;100(1):86-93
pubmed: 26286821
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep;256(9):1695-1702
pubmed: 29774418
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Feb;9(2):e144-e160
pubmed: 33275949
Surv Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep - Oct;63(5):700-710
pubmed: 28887138
Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;100(1):78-85
pubmed: 26112871
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1545-1602
pubmed: 27733282
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 20;11(10):e0162229
pubmed: 27764086
Lancet. 2017 Nov 11;390(10108):2183-2193
pubmed: 28577860
Br J Ophthalmol. 2019 Feb;103(2):191-195
pubmed: 29699984
Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 Jun;129(6):767-72
pubmed: 21320952
Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 May;97(3):e349-e355
pubmed: 30790460
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Feb;9(2):e130-e143
pubmed: 33275950
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Nov 11;54(12):7410-6
pubmed: 24135752
Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug;168:237-249
pubmed: 27296492
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Nov 1;57(14):5872-5881
pubmed: 27802517
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 10;15(12):e0242786
pubmed: 33301476
Ophthalmology. 2016 Jun;123(6):1201-10
pubmed: 27001534
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 May;131(5):651-8
pubmed: 23538512
Ophthalmology. 2012 Jun;119(6):1134-42
pubmed: 22361313
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Oct;47(10):4254-61
pubmed: 17003413
Acta Ophthalmol. 2016 May;94(3):217-25
pubmed: 26119516
Lancet. 2016 Oct 1;388(10052):1389-1397
pubmed: 27707497
Ophthalmology. 2014 Nov;121(11):2081-90
pubmed: 24974815
Curr Eye Res. 2015 Feb;40(2):191-200
pubmed: 25285808
Surv Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov - Dec;65(6):662-674
pubmed: 32339525
Maturitas. 2016 Jan;83:19-26
pubmed: 26508081
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Dec;5(12):e1221-e1234
pubmed: 29032195