The "Magnificent Seven Errors" in Forensic Autopsy Practice: The Italian Context.

Chain of custody Forensic autopsy Forensic pathology Histological samples Medicolegal errors Toxicological analyses

Journal

Academic forensic pathology
ISSN: 1925-3621
Titre abrégé: Acad Forensic Pathol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596736

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Historique:
received: 18 02 2021
accepted: 03 10 2021
entrez: 10 1 2022
pubmed: 11 1 2022
medline: 11 1 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

According to the Italian legal system, forensic autopsies are performed by a medical doctor specialized in legal medicine, otherwise known as a medicolegal expert (MLE), who has a range of very complex responsibilities. Indeed, the quality of forensic autopsy activity is always questioned in courts of law; incorrect assessments are dangerous because they can jeopardize the validity of a criminal investigation and thus affect the outcome so that a real culprit may be acquitted or an innocent person convicted. Nonconformities also discredit the professionalism of the specialist who performs the autopsy. The work of a MLE implies a series of assignments and duties that should be given constant consideration, but when certain aspects of this activity are underestimated or overlooked, this can lead the expert to make mistakes with irreparable consequences for the judicial investigation. In this article, for the first time, we present a summary of seven known errors related to autopsy activity following death by unnatural causes, with the purpose of alerting MLEs who work under the Italian judicial system to the potential dangers of such errors. These relate to: oversights in autopsy technique, incorrect collection of photographic and video material, unauthorized attendance at the autopsy, missing/mistaken reporting at any stage of the forensic activity, failure to notify the party forensic consultant, using histological or toxicological nonaccredited laboratories for forensic activities, and lack of observance of the chain of custody.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35003452
doi: 10.1177/19253621211056191
pii: 10.1177_19253621211056191
pmc: PMC8727839
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

208-214

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosures & Declaration of Conflicts of Interest: The authors, reviewers, editors, and publication staff do not report any relevant conflicts of interest.

Références

Adv Med Educ Pract. 2015 Mar 11;6:159-70
pubmed: 25792862
Histopathology. 2003 May;42(5):417-23
pubmed: 12713617
J Audiov Media Med. 1994 Jan;17(1):15-20
pubmed: 8034901
BMJ. 2010 Apr 30;340:c2032
pubmed: 20435644
Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2019 Feb;40(1):86-93
pubmed: 30686372
Med Leg J. 2012;80(Pt 4):151-4
pubmed: 23341294
Can Med Assoc J. 1964 Oct 17;91:845-50
pubmed: 14217247
Arch Kriminol. 1997 Mar-Apr;199(3-4):65-74
pubmed: 9235875
Clin Chem. 1988 Mar;34(3):633-6
pubmed: 3280167
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2014 Sep;10(3):401-12
pubmed: 24577850
Int J Legal Med. 2018 Nov;132(6):1671-1674
pubmed: 29468380
BMJ. 2001 Dec 15;323(7326):1426
pubmed: 11744571

Auteurs

Classifications MeSH