Preclinical Model of Stereotactic Ablative Lung Irradiation Using Arc Delivery in the Mouse: Is Fractionation Worthwhile?
fibrosis
fractionation
lung
mouse
radiation
stereotactic body radiation therapy
Journal
Frontiers in medicine
ISSN: 2296-858X
Titre abrégé: Front Med (Lausanne)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101648047
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
13
10
2021
accepted:
07
12
2021
entrez:
10
1
2022
pubmed:
11
1
2022
medline:
11
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Lung stereotactic body radiation therapy is characterized by a reduction in target volumes and the use of severely hypofractionated schedules. Preclinical modeling became possible thanks to rodent-dedicated irradiation devices allowing accurate beam collimation and focal lung exposure. Given that a great majority of publications use single dose exposures, the question we asked in this study was as follows: in incremented preclinical models, is it worth using fractionated protocols or should we continue focusing solely on volume limitation? The left lungs of C57BL/6JRj mice were exposed to ionizing radiation using arc therapy and 3 × 3 mm beam collimation. Three-fraction schedules delivered over a period of 1 week were used with 20, 28, 40, and 50 Gy doses per fraction. Lung tissue opacification, global histological damage and the numbers of type II pneumocytes and club cells were assessed 6 months post-exposure, together with the gene expression of several lung cells and inflammation markers. Only the administration of 3 × 40 Gy or 3 × 50 Gy generated focal lung fibrosis after 6 months, with tissue opacification visible by cone beam computed tomography, tissue scarring and consolidation, decreased club cell numbers and a reactive increase in the number of type II pneumocytes. A fractionation schedule using an arc-therapy-delivered three fractions/1 week regimen with 3 × 3 mm beam requires 40 Gy per fraction for lung fibrosis to develop within 6 months, a reasonable time lapse given the mouse lifespan. A comparison with previously published laboratory data suggests that, in this focal lung irradiation configuration, administering a Biological Effective Dose ≥ 1000 Gy should be recommended to obtain lung fibrosis within 6 months. The need for such a high dose per fraction challenges the appropriateness of using preclinical highly focused fractionation schedules in mice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35004768
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.794324
pmc: PMC8739220
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
794324Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Bertho, Dos Santos, Braga-Cohen, Buard, Paget, Guipaud, Tarlet, Milliat and François.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Nov 1;96(3):529-37
pubmed: 27681749
Int J Radiat Biol. 2017 Feb;93(2):184-193
pubmed: 27645719
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019 Feb 21;5(1):13
pubmed: 30792503
Radiat Res. 1980 Oct;84(1):133-43
pubmed: 7454976
Lung. 2016 Feb;194(1):81-90
pubmed: 26563330
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Oct 2;105(19):1474-84
pubmed: 24052614
J Clin Transl Res. 2021 Apr 22;7(2):199-208
pubmed: 34104822
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Jan;142:210-216
pubmed: 31431371
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Jul 1;77(3):895-902
pubmed: 20510200
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Sep 1;93(1):166-72
pubmed: 26279032
J Radiat Res. 2014 Jul;55(4):648-57
pubmed: 24556815
Radiat Res. 2013 Jun;179(6):617-29
pubmed: 23621375
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Feb 1;88(2):254-62
pubmed: 24411596
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Oct 1;93(2):425-35
pubmed: 26253394
Front Oncol. 2019 Sep 06;9:877
pubmed: 31555602
Radiat Oncol. 2017 Nov 7;12(1):172
pubmed: 29116014
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2015 May;27(5):260-9
pubmed: 25797579
J Thorac Oncol. 2007 Jul;2(7 Suppl 3):S101-12
pubmed: 17603304
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Aug 15;21(16):3716-26
pubmed: 25910951
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Feb 15;183(4):511-21
pubmed: 20870756
PLoS One. 2016 May 12;11(5):e0154942
pubmed: 27171163
Br J Radiol. 2019 Mar;92(1095):20180473
pubmed: 30653332
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2008 Oct;18(4):240-3
pubmed: 18725110
Radiother Oncol. 2013 Oct;109(1):13-20
pubmed: 24183066
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2016 Mar;13(1):26-30
pubmed: 27212975
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2008 Oct;18(4):234-9
pubmed: 18725109
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jun 1;104(2):279-290
pubmed: 30703512
Radiother Oncol. 2000 Sep;56(3):283-8
pubmed: 10974376
Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 1987 Mar;51(3):393-9
pubmed: 3494694
Med Phys. 2001 Jun;28(6):868-93
pubmed: 11439485
Radiother Oncol. 2017 Sep;124(3):475-481
pubmed: 28697853
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Nov 15;99(4):972-982
pubmed: 28870787
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Nov 1;90(3):696-704
pubmed: 25200196
Lung. 2015 Jun;193(3):409-19
pubmed: 25749666
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Feb 1;181(3):254-63
pubmed: 19850947
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Apr 1;103(5):1231-1240
pubmed: 30552964
Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2004 Dec;56(3):181-7
pubmed: 15625787
J Inflamm (Lond). 2019 May 29;16:11
pubmed: 31160885
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Apr 1;106(5):1017-1027
pubmed: 31987976
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53628
pubmed: 23326473
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2017 Mar-Apr;22(2):86-95
pubmed: 28490978
Int J Radiat Biol. 2020 Jan;96(1):129-144
pubmed: 30359147
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2017 Nov;57(5):519-526
pubmed: 28586241
Chest. 2019 Jul;156(1):150-162
pubmed: 30998908
Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2014 Jul;66(4):169-77
pubmed: 24480153
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Jul 1;107(3):548-562
pubmed: 32278852
Radiat Res. 2018 Nov;190(5):513-525
pubmed: 30117783
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1977 May-Jun;2(5-6):475-90
pubmed: 885753
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1980 Sep;6(9):1267-9
pubmed: 6893983
J Clin Invest. 2013 Jul;123(7):3025-36
pubmed: 23921127