The Biomechanical Consequences of Arthroscopic Hip Capsulotomy and Repair in Positions at Risk for Dislocation.
capsulotomy
dislocation torque
hip arthroscopy
hip biomechanics
hip dislocation
Journal
Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 2325-9671
Titre abrégé: Orthop J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101620522
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Jan 2022
Historique:
received:
21
07
2021
accepted:
03
09
2021
entrez:
10
1
2022
pubmed:
11
1
2022
medline:
11
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The effect of interportal (IP) capsulotomy, short T-capsulotomy, and long T-capsulotomy, and their repairs, on resistance to anterior and posterior "at risk for dislocation" positions has not been quantified. Our primary hypothesis was that an IP capsulotomy would have a minimal effect on hip resistive torque compared with both short and long T-capsulotomies in the at-risk dislocation positions. Our secondary hypothesis was that capsule repair would significantly increase hip resistive torque for all capsulotomies. Controlled laboratory study. We mounted 10 cadaveric hips on a biaxial test frame in an anterior dislocation high-risk position (20° of hip extension and external rotation) and posterior dislocation high-risk position (90° of hip flexion and internal rotation). An axial force of 100 N was applied to the intact hip while the femur was internally or externally rotated at 15° per second to a torque of 5 N·m. The rotatory position at 5 N·m was recorded and set as a target for each subsequent condition. Hips were then sequentially tested with IP, short T-, and long T-capsulotomies and with corresponding repairs randomized within each condition. Peak resistive torques were compared using generalized estimating equation modeling and post hoc Bonferroni-adjusted tests. For the anterior position, the IP and long T-capsulotomies demonstrated significantly lower resistive torques compared with intact. For the posterior position, both the short and long T-capsulotomies resulted in significantly lower resistive torques compared with intact. Repairs for all 3 capsulotomy types were not significantly different from the intact condition at anterior and posterior positions. An IP incision resulted in a decrease in capsular resistive torque in the anterior but not the posterior at-risk dislocation position, in which direction only T-capsulotomies led to a significant decrease. All capsulotomy repair conditions resulted in hip resistive torques that were similar to the intact hip in both dislocation positions. Our results suggest that it is biomechanically advantageous to repair IP, short T-, and long T-capsulotomies, particularly for at-risk anterior dislocation positions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The effect of interportal (IP) capsulotomy, short T-capsulotomy, and long T-capsulotomy, and their repairs, on resistance to anterior and posterior "at risk for dislocation" positions has not been quantified.
HYPOTHESES
OBJECTIVE
Our primary hypothesis was that an IP capsulotomy would have a minimal effect on hip resistive torque compared with both short and long T-capsulotomies in the at-risk dislocation positions. Our secondary hypothesis was that capsule repair would significantly increase hip resistive torque for all capsulotomies.
STUDY DESIGN
METHODS
Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS
METHODS
We mounted 10 cadaveric hips on a biaxial test frame in an anterior dislocation high-risk position (20° of hip extension and external rotation) and posterior dislocation high-risk position (90° of hip flexion and internal rotation). An axial force of 100 N was applied to the intact hip while the femur was internally or externally rotated at 15° per second to a torque of 5 N·m. The rotatory position at 5 N·m was recorded and set as a target for each subsequent condition. Hips were then sequentially tested with IP, short T-, and long T-capsulotomies and with corresponding repairs randomized within each condition. Peak resistive torques were compared using generalized estimating equation modeling and post hoc Bonferroni-adjusted tests.
RESULTS
RESULTS
For the anterior position, the IP and long T-capsulotomies demonstrated significantly lower resistive torques compared with intact. For the posterior position, both the short and long T-capsulotomies resulted in significantly lower resistive torques compared with intact. Repairs for all 3 capsulotomy types were not significantly different from the intact condition at anterior and posterior positions.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
An IP incision resulted in a decrease in capsular resistive torque in the anterior but not the posterior at-risk dislocation position, in which direction only T-capsulotomies led to a significant decrease. All capsulotomy repair conditions resulted in hip resistive torques that were similar to the intact hip in both dislocation positions.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
CONCLUSIONS
Our results suggest that it is biomechanically advantageous to repair IP, short T-, and long T-capsulotomies, particularly for at-risk anterior dislocation positions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35005047
doi: 10.1177/23259671211061609
pii: 10.1177_23259671211061609
pmc: PMC8733365
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
23259671211061609Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: S.A.M. is the founder of, and has an ownership interest in, Agelity. B.T.K. has received consulting fees from Arthrex, Organicell, and Smith & Nephew; royalties from Arthrex; and hospitality payments from Stryker; and has stock/stock options in Organicell. A.R. has received education payments from Arthrex; consulting fees from Anika, Arthrex, Bodycad, ConforMIS, Enhatch, Flexion Therapeutics, Heron Therapeutics, Smith & Nephew, and Stryker; nonconsulting fees from Arthrex and Smith & Nephew; and royalties from ConforMIS; and has an ownership interest in ConforMIS. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.
Références
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2014 Apr;43(4):160-5
pubmed: 24730000
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Mar;44(3):689-95
pubmed: 26717973
J Biomech. 2003 Apr;36(4):577-91
pubmed: 12600348
Clin Sports Med. 2016 Jul;35(3):373-389
pubmed: 27343391
Arthroscopy. 2016 Jun;32(6):1196-1204.e1
pubmed: 27013107
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Mar;467(3):760-8
pubmed: 19018604
Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2015 Dec;23(4):164-8
pubmed: 26524549
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Jan;25(1):9-23
pubmed: 28120020
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Aug;42(8):1785-90
pubmed: 24875469
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Aug;48(10):2465-2470
pubmed: 32667821
Arthroscopy. 2019 Feb;35(2):646-656.e3
pubmed: 30712639
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jul;39 Suppl:85S-91S
pubmed: 21709037
Arthroscopy. 2016 Aug;32(8):1571-80
pubmed: 27212048
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1973 Nov;55(4):780-5
pubmed: 4766182
Arthroscopy. 2018 Mar;34(3):853-863.e1
pubmed: 29373289
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov;42(11):2634-42
pubmed: 25214529
Bone Joint J. 2015 Apr;97-B(4):484-91
pubmed: 25820886
Arthroscopy. 2008 Feb;24(2):188-95
pubmed: 18237703
J Arthroplasty. 2008 Feb;23(2):226-34
pubmed: 18280417
Arthroscopy. 2011 Dec;27(12):1720-31
pubmed: 22047925
J Orthop Res. 2001 May;19(3):359-64
pubmed: 11398846
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jun;38(6):1160-5
pubmed: 20228244
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jan;91(1):192-7
pubmed: 19122095
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;45(8):1745-1754
pubmed: 28371596
Arthroscopy. 2013 Jan;29(1):162-73
pubmed: 22901333
Am J Sports Med. 2018 May;46(6):1315-1323
pubmed: 29505731
Front Surg. 2016 Mar 04;3:13
pubmed: 26973840
Arthroscopy. 2015 Aug;31(8):1511-7
pubmed: 25882176
Arthroscopy. 2018 Jun;34(6):1825-1830
pubmed: 29580743
Am J Sports Med. 2019 May;47(6):1451-1458
pubmed: 30946598