Comparison of Adult Refractive Disorder Measurements Using HandyRef-K, Retinomax, Plusoptix, and Table-top Autorefractometer Devices.
Adult population
HandyRef-K
Plusoptix
Retinomax K-plus 3
Journal
Beyoglu eye journal
ISSN: 2587-0394
Titre abrégé: Beyoglu Eye J
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101777848
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
21
01
2021
accepted:
07
04
2021
entrez:
10
1
2022
pubmed:
11
1
2022
medline:
11
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study was conducted to compare refractive error measurements recorded using the Nidek HandyRef-K handheld autorefractometer (HDY; Nidek Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), Plusoptix A09 photorefractor (PO; Plusoptix GmbH, Nuremberg, Germany), Retinomax K-plus 3 (RTX; Right Mfg. Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), and a table-mounted autorefractometer/keratometer (TTR; URK 800, Unicos Co. Ltd., Daejeon, Republic of Korea). Patients aged ≥18 years underwent measurement of refraction without cycloplegia using 4 devices and the spherical power (SP), cylindrical power (CP), and spherical equivalent (SE) values were analyzed and compared. A total of 181 eyes of 181 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the patients was 33.08±0.95 years (range: 18-79 years). There was a significantly significant difference in the SP, CP, and SE values determined by the devices (p<0.001). The SP and SE values of the RTX and the HDY were similar, while the other device results were different (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p=0.004). The CP values of the PO and the TTR, the HDY and the TTR were also comparable. The HDY, RTX, and the PO are suitable for screening in clinical practice, but the findings strongly suggest that they should be used with caution.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35005503
doi: 10.14744/bej.2021.28247
pii: BEJ-6-108
pmc: PMC8651018
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
108-114Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2021 by Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of Interest: None declared.
Références
J Sch Nurs. 2020 Jul 14;:1059840520940370
pubmed: 32662321
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul 04;32(3):268-273
pubmed: 32775802
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2010 Oct;227(10):792-7
pubmed: 20963682
Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan;96(1):83-6
pubmed: 21515564
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2017 Mar;40(3):209-214
pubmed: 28318725
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2016 Jul;20(14):2988-92
pubmed: 27460724
J Am Optom Assoc. 1996 Oct;67(10):619-30
pubmed: 8942135
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000 Jan;26(1):62-70
pubmed: 10646148
Acta Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep;92(6):e458-62
pubmed: 24641244
Int Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug;39(8):1671-1678
pubmed: 30255489
Br J Ophthalmol. 1998 Nov;82(11):1260-4
pubmed: 9924329
BMC Ophthalmol. 2016 Jun 01;16:72
pubmed: 27246869
Optom Vis Sci. 2000 Mar;77(3):140-9
pubmed: 10772231
Int J Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb 18;8(1):128-31
pubmed: 25709922
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2015 Jan-Feb;52(1):37-42
pubmed: 25643369
Strabismus. 1998 Sep;6(3):133-142
pubmed: 10623951
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019 Oct;67(10):1555-1559
pubmed: 31546479
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000 Apr;41(5):1031-7
pubmed: 10752938