Machine Learning Methods of Regression for Plasmonic Nanoantenna Glucose Sensing.

Gaussian process regression artificial neural network glucose sensing machine learning regression analysis sensor calibration surface-enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy

Journal

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1424-8220
Titre abrégé: Sensors (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101204366

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Dec 2021
Historique:
received: 30 11 2021
revised: 15 12 2021
accepted: 16 12 2021
entrez: 11 1 2022
pubmed: 12 1 2022
medline: 13 1 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The measurement and quantification of glucose concentrations is a field of major interest, whether motivated by potential clinical applications or as a prime example of biosensing in basic research. In recent years, optical sensing methods have emerged as promising glucose measurement techniques in the literature, with surface-enhanced infrared absorption (SEIRA) spectroscopy combining the sensitivity of plasmonic systems and the specificity of standard infrared spectroscopy. The challenge addressed in this paper is to determine the best method to estimate the glucose concentration in aqueous solutions in the presence of fructose from the measured reflectance spectra. This is referred to as the inverse problem of sensing and usually solved via linear regression. Here, instead, several advanced machine learning regression algorithms are proposed and compared, while the sensor data are subject to a pre-processing routine aiming to isolate key patterns from which to extract the relevant information. The most accurate and reliable predictions were finally made by a Gaussian process regression model which improves by more than 60% on previous approaches. Our findings give insight into the applicability of machine learning methods of regression for sensor calibration and explore the limitations of SEIRA glucose sensing.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35009555
pii: s22010007
doi: 10.3390/s22010007
pmc: PMC8747440
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Fructose 30237-26-4
Glucose IY9XDZ35W2

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : 431314977

Références

Biosens Bioelectron. 2005 Jun 15;20(12):2555-65
pubmed: 15854825
Anal Chem. 2016 Dec 6;88(23):11271-11282
pubmed: 27779381
Pharm Res. 1995 Dec;12(12):1869-73
pubmed: 8786958
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Aug 12;17(8):
pubmed: 28805693
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Jun 05;17(6):
pubmed: 28587238
Diabetes Care. 2014 Jan;37 Suppl 1:S81-90
pubmed: 24357215
ACS Sens. 2019 Aug 23;4(8):1973-1979
pubmed: 31274277
ISA Trans. 2003 Jul;42(3):337-52
pubmed: 12858970
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:4913-6
pubmed: 19963637
J Med Syst. 2015 Jan;39(1):166
pubmed: 25503416
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Feb 25;20(5):
pubmed: 32106464
Opt Express. 2021 Jun 7;29(12):17926-17939
pubmed: 34154064
Phys Rev Lett. 2008 Oct 10;101(15):157403
pubmed: 18999639
Med Clin North Am. 1998 Jul;82(4):665-87
pubmed: 9706116
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 16;10(1):15200
pubmed: 32938996
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Aug 05;18(8):
pubmed: 30081581
Chem Commun (Camb). 2012 Sep 18;48(72):8999-9010
pubmed: 22806135
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2019 Jan 29;6(9):1801367
pubmed: 31065514
Syst Rev. 2021 May 10;10(1):145
pubmed: 33971958
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2016 May-Aug;6(2):153-9
pubmed: 27195214
Chem Rev. 2017 Apr 12;117(7):5110-5145
pubmed: 28358482
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Aug 17;21(16):
pubmed: 34450960
Sens Actuators B Chem. 2015 Sep;216:321-331
pubmed: 26924894
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jul 11;19(14):
pubmed: 31373287
IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst. 2020 Dec;14(6):1407-1420
pubmed: 33201827
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Feb 15;19(4):
pubmed: 30781431
Sensors (Basel). 2012;12(3):2742-65
pubmed: 22736975
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012 Nov 01;6(6):1242-50
pubmed: 23294768
Nat Commun. 2013;4:2154
pubmed: 23877168

Auteurs

Emilio Corcione (E)

Research Center SCoPE, Institute for System Dynamics, University of Stuttgart, 70563 Stuttgart, Germany.

Diana Pfezer (D)

Research Center SCoPE, 4th Physics Institute, University of Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.

Mario Hentschel (M)

Research Center SCoPE, 4th Physics Institute, University of Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.

Harald Giessen (H)

Research Center SCoPE, 4th Physics Institute, University of Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.

Cristina Tarín (C)

Research Center SCoPE, Institute for System Dynamics, University of Stuttgart, 70563 Stuttgart, Germany.

Articles similaires

Selecting optimal software code descriptors-The case of Java.

Yegor Bugayenko, Zamira Kholmatova, Artem Kruglov et al.
1.00
Software Algorithms Programming Languages

Exploring blood-brain barrier passage using atomic weighted vector and machine learning.

Yoan Martínez-López, Paulina Phoobane, Yanaima Jauriga et al.
1.00
Blood-Brain Barrier Machine Learning Humans Support Vector Machine Software

Understanding the role of machine learning in predicting progression of osteoarthritis.

Simone Castagno, Benjamin Gompels, Estelle Strangmark et al.
1.00
Humans Disease Progression Machine Learning Osteoarthritis
1.00
Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Infant, Newborn Infant, Premature

Classifications MeSH