The Effect of Cooking Method and Cooked Color on Consumer Acceptability of Boneless Pork Chops.

consumer preference cooked color degree of doneness grill pork sous-vide

Journal

Foods (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2304-8158
Titre abrégé: Foods
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101670569

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
31 Dec 2021
Historique:
received: 14 12 2021
revised: 28 12 2021
accepted: 30 12 2021
entrez: 11 1 2022
pubmed: 12 1 2022
medline: 12 1 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The objective was to determine the effects of sous-vide cooking and degree of doneness on consumer eating experience of pork chops when cooked color was expected to differ. The hypothesis was consumers would prefer a cooked brown color and would rate grilled chops more acceptable than sous-vide chops. Chops were cooked to 63 °C or 71 °C using either an open-hearth grill or a sous-vide device. Participants evaluated four samples for tenderness, juiciness, flavor, and overall acceptability. Participants rated a greater percentage of chops cooked sous-vide at 63 °C as tender (82.82%), juicy (55.83%) and acceptable (60.34%) compared with all other cooking method and degree of doneness combinations. Participants rated a greater percentage of sous-vide chops as tender and acceptable compared to grilled chops. Participants rated a greater percentage of chops cooked to 63 °C as tender, juicy, flavorful, and acceptable when compared to 71 °C. Even when participants could visualize cooked color, they preferred chops cooked to 63 °C compared with chops cooked to 71 °C. Overall, participants preferred chops cooked to 63 °C compared to 71 °C regardless of the cooking method and preferred chops cooked to 63 °C using the sous-vide cooking method the most among all treatments.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35010231
pii: foods11010106
doi: 10.3390/foods11010106
pmc: PMC8750212
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Illinois Pork Producers Association
ID : n/a

Références

J Anim Sci. 2008 Mar;86(3):730-7
pubmed: 18156359
J Anim Sci. 2018 Sep 7;96(9):3768-3776
pubmed: 29982650
J Anim Sci. 2019 May 30;97(6):2460-2467
pubmed: 30968136
Meat Sci. 2014 Nov;98(3):361-71
pubmed: 25017317
J Anim Sci. 2019 Jul 30;97(8):3348-3353
pubmed: 31190071
J Anim Sci. 2018 May 4;96(5):1736-1744
pubmed: 29509888
J Anim Sci. 2017 May;95(5):2052-2060
pubmed: 28726999

Auteurs

Lauren T Honegger (LT)

Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, 1503 S. Maryland Drive, Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, USA.

Erin E Bryan (EE)

Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, 1503 S. Maryland Drive, Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, USA.

Hannah E Price (HE)

Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, 1503 S. Maryland Drive, Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, USA.

Taylor K Ruth (TK)

Department of Agriculture Leadership, Education and Communication, University of Nebraska, 143 Finley Hall, P.O. Box 830947, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.

Dustin D Boler (DD)

Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, 1503 S. Maryland Drive, Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, USA.

Anna C Dilger (AC)

Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, 1503 S. Maryland Drive, Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, USA.

Classifications MeSH