The Effect of Cooking Method and Cooked Color on Consumer Acceptability of Boneless Pork Chops.
consumer preference
cooked color
degree of doneness
grill
pork
sous-vide
Journal
Foods (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2304-8158
Titre abrégé: Foods
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101670569
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 Dec 2021
31 Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
14
12
2021
revised:
28
12
2021
accepted:
30
12
2021
entrez:
11
1
2022
pubmed:
12
1
2022
medline:
12
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The objective was to determine the effects of sous-vide cooking and degree of doneness on consumer eating experience of pork chops when cooked color was expected to differ. The hypothesis was consumers would prefer a cooked brown color and would rate grilled chops more acceptable than sous-vide chops. Chops were cooked to 63 °C or 71 °C using either an open-hearth grill or a sous-vide device. Participants evaluated four samples for tenderness, juiciness, flavor, and overall acceptability. Participants rated a greater percentage of chops cooked sous-vide at 63 °C as tender (82.82%), juicy (55.83%) and acceptable (60.34%) compared with all other cooking method and degree of doneness combinations. Participants rated a greater percentage of sous-vide chops as tender and acceptable compared to grilled chops. Participants rated a greater percentage of chops cooked to 63 °C as tender, juicy, flavorful, and acceptable when compared to 71 °C. Even when participants could visualize cooked color, they preferred chops cooked to 63 °C compared with chops cooked to 71 °C. Overall, participants preferred chops cooked to 63 °C compared to 71 °C regardless of the cooking method and preferred chops cooked to 63 °C using the sous-vide cooking method the most among all treatments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35010231
pii: foods11010106
doi: 10.3390/foods11010106
pmc: PMC8750212
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Illinois Pork Producers Association
ID : n/a
Références
J Anim Sci. 2008 Mar;86(3):730-7
pubmed: 18156359
J Anim Sci. 2018 Sep 7;96(9):3768-3776
pubmed: 29982650
J Anim Sci. 2019 May 30;97(6):2460-2467
pubmed: 30968136
Meat Sci. 2014 Nov;98(3):361-71
pubmed: 25017317
J Anim Sci. 2019 Jul 30;97(8):3348-3353
pubmed: 31190071
J Anim Sci. 2018 May 4;96(5):1736-1744
pubmed: 29509888
J Anim Sci. 2017 May;95(5):2052-2060
pubmed: 28726999