Dorsal visual stream is preferentially engaged during externally guided action selection in Parkinson Disease.
Action selection
Choice task
Dorsal visual stream
Electrocorticography
Posterior parietal cortex
Premotor cortex
Journal
Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology
ISSN: 1872-8952
Titre abrégé: Clin Neurophysiol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 100883319
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2022
04 2022
Historique:
received:
09
03
2021
revised:
01
11
2021
accepted:
28
11
2021
pubmed:
12
1
2022
medline:
23
4
2022
entrez:
11
1
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In patients with Parkinson Disease (PD), self-initiated or internally cued (IC) actions are thought to be compromised by the disease process, as exemplified by impairments in action initiation. In contrast, externally-cued (EC) actions which are made in response to sensory prompts can restore a remarkable degree of movement capability in PD, particularly alleviating freezing-of-gait. This study investigates the electrophysiological underpinnings of movement facilitation in PD through visuospatial cuing, with particular attention to the dynamics within the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) and lateral premotor cortex (LPMC) axis of the dorsal visual stream. Invasive cortical recordings over the PPC and LPMC were obtained during deep brain stimulation lead implantation surgery. Thirteen PD subjects performed an action selection task, which was constituted by left or right joystick movement with directional visual cuing in the EC condition and internally generated direction selection in the IC condition. Time-resolved neural activities within and between the PPC and LPMC were compared between EC and IC conditions. Reaction times (RT) were significantly faster in the EC condition relative to the IC condition (paired t-test, p = 0.0015). PPC-LPMC inter-site phase synchrony within the β-band (13-35 Hz) was significantly greater in the EC relative to the IC condition. Greater PPC-LPMC β debiased phase lag index (dwPLI) prior to movement onset was correlated with faster reaction times only in the EC condition. Multivariate granger causality (GC) was greater in the EC condition relative to the IC condition, prior to and during movement. Relative to IC actions, we report relative increase in inter-site phase synchrony and directional PPC to LPMC connectivity in the β-band during preparation and execution of EC actions. Furthermore, increased strength of connectivity is predictive of faster RT, which are pathologically slow in PD patients. Stronger engagement of the PPC-LPMC cortical network by an EC specifically through the channel of β-modulation is implicated in correcting the pathological slowing of action initiation seen in Parkinson's patients. These findings shed light on the electrophysiological mechanisms that underlie motor facilitation in PD patients through visuospatial cuing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35012844
pii: S1388-2457(21)00886-5
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.11.077
pmc: PMC8941338
mid: NIHMS1768883
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
237-246Subventions
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS097782
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
J Neurophysiol. 2014 Dec 15;112(12):3138-53
pubmed: 25231609
Neuroscientist. 2008 Aug;14(4):319-25
pubmed: 18660462
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:156869
pubmed: 21253357
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987 Sep;50(9):1178-83
pubmed: 3668566
Nat Neurosci. 1999 Jun;2(6):563-7
pubmed: 10448222
J Neurosci. 2020 Jul 22;40(30):5833-5846
pubmed: 32576623
J Neurosci. 2012 Sep 26;32(39):13396-401
pubmed: 23015430
J Neurosci Methods. 2010 Feb 15;186(2):262-73
pubmed: 19961876
Neuroimage. 2002 Feb;15(2):373-85
pubmed: 11798272
J Neurosci. 2014 May 21;34(21):7322-33
pubmed: 24849364
J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Mar 15;134(1):9-21
pubmed: 15102499
Front Neurol. 2014 Jan 09;4:209
pubmed: 24409167
Biol Cybern. 2000 Jul;83(1):35-45
pubmed: 10933236
Mov Disord. 2002 Nov;17(6):1148-60
pubmed: 12465051
Brain. 2015 Mar;138(Pt 3):664-78
pubmed: 25567321
Eur J Neurosci. 2016 Apr;43(7):861-9
pubmed: 26797876
Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Nov 1;4(11):423-431
pubmed: 11058820
Front Syst Neurosci. 2020 Jul 23;14:54
pubmed: 32792918
Neuroimage. 2014 Feb 1;86:381-91
pubmed: 24128740
Ann Neurol. 1999 Mar;45(3):329-36
pubmed: 10072047
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 Mar;14(3):202-16
pubmed: 23385869
Curr Biol. 1998 Jul 2;8(14):R489-91
pubmed: 9663382
Neuroimage. 2011 Apr 15;55(4):1548-65
pubmed: 21276857
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(13):2594-606
pubmed: 16300804
Nat Neurosci. 2000 Jul;3(7):729-36
pubmed: 10862707
Neuroimage. 2018 Aug 15;177:20-29
pubmed: 29738912
NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2018 Jun 26;4:19
pubmed: 29951580
J Neurosci. 2014 Sep 3;34(36):11948-58
pubmed: 25186742
J Neurosci. 2009 May 13;29(19):6105-13
pubmed: 19439588
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011 Apr;12(4):217-30
pubmed: 21415848
Neural Netw. 2008 Oct;21(8):1094-104
pubmed: 18599267
Brain. 1995 Aug;118 ( Pt 4):913-33
pubmed: 7655888
Cereb Cortex. 2013 Mar;23(3):520-30
pubmed: 22414772
Mov Disord. 2017 Sep;32(9):1264-1310
pubmed: 28887905
J Neurosci Methods. 2006 Jan 30;150(2):228-37
pubmed: 16099512
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jun 29;101(26):9849-54
pubmed: 15210971
Exp Brain Res. 2003 Nov;153(2):146-57
pubmed: 14610633
Neuroimage. 2003 Jul;19(3):764-76
pubmed: 12880805
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 10;115(28):7440-7445
pubmed: 29950316
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2018;96(4):249-258
pubmed: 30196280
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Jan;47(1):145-57
pubmed: 18761363
Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 15;125:515-521
pubmed: 26520771
J Neurosci. 2018 May 9;38(19):4556-4568
pubmed: 29661966
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Mar;94(3):562-70
pubmed: 23127307
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Apr;18(4):626-36
pubmed: 16768365
Neurobiol Dis. 2015 Oct;82:226-234
pubmed: 26102020
J Neurosci Methods. 2007 Aug 15;164(1):177-90
pubmed: 17517438
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004 Dec;14(6):715-9
pubmed: 15582373
Neuroscience. 1999;89(4):1009-23
pubmed: 10362291
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jan;91(1):2-11
pubmed: 22157432
Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:9-28
pubmed: 30125134
Prog Brain Res. 2006;159:135-47
pubmed: 17071228
Front Integr Neurosci. 2016 Nov 22;10:37
pubmed: 27920670
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Nov;11(11):760-72
pubmed: 20944662
Brain Res. 1995 Dec 18;704(2):167-74
pubmed: 8788911
Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(2):162-77
pubmed: 15707902
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
pubmed: 9176952
Neuron. 2021 Mar 3;109(5):869-881.e6
pubmed: 33482087
Brain. 2019 Aug 1;142(8):2288-2302
pubmed: 31236577
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Dec;9(12):934-46
pubmed: 19020512
Clin Rehabil. 2005 Oct;19(7):695-713
pubmed: 16250189
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Jul;35(7):3227-37
pubmed: 24123553
Neural Netw. 2006 Oct;19(8):1120-36
pubmed: 16945502
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 23;:
pubmed: 31871144