Health-related quality of life measures in adult spinal deformity: can we replace the SRS-22 with PROMIS?
Adult spinal deformity
Fusion
HRQL
MCID
PROMIS
Patient-reported outcomes
Spine surgery
Journal
European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
ISSN: 1432-0932
Titre abrégé: Eur Spine J
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9301980
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2022
05 2022
Historique:
received:
09
10
2021
accepted:
23
12
2021
revised:
09
10
2021
pubmed:
12
1
2022
medline:
21
5
2022
entrez:
11
1
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To determine the validity and responsiveness of PROMIS metrics versus the SRS-22r questionnaire in adult spinal deformity (ASD). Surgical ASD patients undergoing ≥ 4 levels fused with complete baseline PROMIS and SRS-22r data were included. Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and test-retest reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)] were compared. Cronbach's alpha and ICC values ≥ 0.70 were predefined as satisfactory. Convergent validity was evaluated via Spearman's correlations. Responsiveness was assessed via paired samples t tests with Cohen's d to assess measure of effect (baseline to 3 months). One hundred and ten pts are included. Mean baseline SRS-22r score was 2.62 ± 0.67 (domains = Function: 2.6, Pain: 2.5, Self-image: 2.2, Mental Health: 3.0). Mean PROMIS domains = Physical Function (PF): 12.4, Pain Intensity (PI): 91.7, Pain Interference (Int): 55.9. Cronbach's alpha, and ICC were not satisfactory for any SRS-22 and PROMIS domains. PROMIS-Int reliability was low for all SRS-22 domains (0.037-0.225). Convergent validity demonstrated strong correlation via Spearman's rho between PROMIS-PI and overall SRS-22r (- 0.61), SRS-22 Function (- 0.781), and SRS-22 Pain (- 0.735). PROMIS-PF had strong correlation with SRS-22 Function (0.643), while PROMIS-Int had moderate correlation with SRS-22 Pain (- 0.507). Effect size via Cohen's d showed that PROMIS had superior responsiveness across all domains except for self-image. PROMIS is a valid measure compared to SRS-22r in terms of convergent validity, and has greater measure of effect in terms of responsiveness, but failed in reliability and internal consistency. Surgeons should consider the lack of reliability and internal consistency (despite validity and responsiveness) of the PROMIS to SRS-22r before replacing the traditional questionnaire with the computer-adaptive testing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35013830
doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-07106-6
pii: 10.1007/s00586-021-07106-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1184-1188Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Chi JH, Tay B, Stahl D, Lee R (2007) Complex deformities of the cervical spine. Neurosurg Clin N Am 18(2):295–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2007.01.003
doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2007.01.003
pubmed: 17556131
Karikari IO, Metz LN (2018) Preventing pseudoarthrosis and proximal junctional kyphosis. Neurosurg Clin N Am 29(3):365–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2018.03.005
doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2018.03.005
pubmed: 29933804
Glassman SD, Berven S, Kostuik J et al (2006) Nonsurgical resource utilization in adult spinal deformity. Spine 31(8):941–947. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000209318.32148.8b
doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000209318.32148.8b
pubmed: 16622386
Glassman SD, Schwab FJ, Bridwell KH et al (2007) The selection of operative versus nonoperative treatment in patients with adult scoliosis. Spine 32(1):93–97. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000251022.18847.77
doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000251022.18847.77
pubmed: 17202898
Berven S, Deviren V, Demir-Deviren S et al (2003) Studies in the modified scoliosis research society outcomes instrument in adults: validation, reliability, and discriminatory capacity. Spine 28(18):2164–2169. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000084666.53553.D6 (discussion 2169)
doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000084666.53553.D6
pubmed: 14501930
Booth KC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG et al (1999) Complications and predictive factors for the successful treatment of flatback deformity (fixed sagittal imbalance). Spine 24(16):1712–1720. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10472106
Burton DC, Glattes RC (2007) Measuring outcomes in spinal deformity. Neurosurg Clin N Am 18(2):403–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2007.03.001
doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2007.03.001
pubmed: 17556143
Faraj SSA, van Hooff ML, Holewijn RM et al (2017) Measuring outcomes in adult spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review to identify current strengths, weaknesses and gaps in patient-reported outcome measures. Eur Spine J 26(8):2084–2093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5125-4
doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5125-4
pubmed: 28534221
Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D et al (2003) Scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment. Spine 28(1):70–73. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200301010-00016
doi: 10.1097/00007632-200301010-00016
pubmed: 12544959
Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, Manna B (2003) The reliability and concurrent validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 28(1):63–69. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000047634.95839.67
doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000047634.95839.67
pubmed: 12544958
Cella D, Riley W, Stone A et al (2010) The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. J Clin Epidemiol 63(11):1179–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011
pubmed: 20685078
pmcid: 2965562
Pilkonis PA, Choi SW, Reise SP et al (2011) Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®): depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment 18(3):263–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191111411667
doi: 10.1177/1073191111411667
pubmed: 21697139
pmcid: 3153635
DeWalt DA, Rothrock N, Yount S et al (2007) Evaluation of item candidates: the PROMIS qualitative item review. Med Care 45(5 Suppl 1):S12-21. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000254567.79743.e2
doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000254567.79743.e2
pubmed: 17443114
pmcid: 2810630
Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N et al (2007) The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Med Care 45(Suppl 1):S3–S11. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55
doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55
pubmed: 17443116
pmcid: 2829758
Brodke DS, Goz V, Voss MW et al (2017) PROMIS PF CAT outperforms the ODI and SF-36 physical function domain in spine patients. Spine 42(12):921–929. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001965
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001965
pubmed: 27792105
pmcid: 5408297
Brodke DJ, Saltzman CL, Brodke DS (2016) PROMIS for orthopaedic outcomes measurement. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 24(11):744–749. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00404
doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00404
pubmed: 27661391
Bridwell KH, Cats-Baril W, Harrast J et al (2005) The validity of the SRS-22 instrument in an adult spinal deformity population compared with the Oswestry and SF-12: a study of response distribution, concurrent validity, internal consistency, and reliability. Spine 30(4):455–461. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15706344 . Accessed 23 Aug 2013
Bernstein DN, Papuga MO, Sanders JO et al (2019) Evaluating the correlation and performance of PROMIS to SRS questionnaires in adult and pediatric spinal deformity patients. Spine Deform 7(1):118–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.05.010
doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2018.05.010
pubmed: 30587304
Papuga MO, Mesfin A, Molinari R et al (2016) Correlation of PROMIS physical function and pain CAT instruments with Oswestry Disability Index and Neck Disability Index in spine patients. Spine 41(14):1153–1159. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001518
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001518
pubmed: 26909832
pmcid: 4938742
Raad M, Jain A, Huang M et al (2018) Validity and responsiveness of PROMIS in adult spinal deformity: the need for a self-image domain. Spine J 19(1):50–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.07.014
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.07.014
pubmed: 30053523
Ibaseta A, Rahman R, Skolasky RL et al (2020) SRS-22r legacy scores can be accurately translated to PROMIS scores in adult spinal deformity patients. Spine J 20(2):234–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2019.09.006
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.09.006
pubmed: 31525469