Safety and immunogenicity of 2-dose heterologous Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo Ebola vaccination in children and adolescents in Africa: A randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre Phase II clinical trial.
Journal
PLoS medicine
ISSN: 1549-1676
Titre abrégé: PLoS Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101231360
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2022
01 2022
Historique:
received:
20
05
2021
accepted:
09
11
2021
entrez:
11
1
2022
pubmed:
12
1
2022
medline:
11
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Reoccurring Ebola outbreaks in West and Central Africa have led to serious illness and death in thousands of adults and children. The objective of this study was to assess safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of the heterologous 2-dose Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo vaccination regimen in adolescents and children in Africa. In this multicentre, randomised, observer-blind, placebo-controlled Phase II study, 131 adolescents (12 to 17 years old) and 132 children (4 to 11 years old) were enrolled from Eastern and Western Africa and randomised 5:1 to receive study vaccines or placebo. Vaccine groups received intramuscular injections of Ad26.ZEBOV (5 × 1010 viral particles) and MVA-BN-Filo (1 × 108 infectious units) 28 or 56 days apart; placebo recipients received saline. Primary outcomes were safety and tolerability. Solicited adverse events (AEs) were recorded until 7 days after each vaccination and serious AEs (SAEs) throughout the study. Secondary and exploratory outcomes were humoral immune responses (binding and neutralising Ebola virus [EBOV] glycoprotein [GP]-specific antibodies), up to 1 year after the first dose. Enrolment began on February 26, 2016, and the date of last participant last visit was November 28, 2018. Of the 263 participants enrolled, 217 (109 adolescents, 108 children) received the 2-dose regimen, and 43 (20 adolescents, 23 children) received 2 placebo doses. Median age was 14.0 (range 11 to 17) and 7.0 (range 4 to 11) years for adolescents and children, respectively. Fifty-four percent of the adolescents and 51% of the children were male. All participants were Africans, and, although there was a slight male preponderance overall, the groups were well balanced. No vaccine-related SAEs were reported; solicited AEs were mostly mild/moderate. Twenty-one days post-MVA-BN-Filo vaccination, binding antibody responses against EBOV GP were observed in 100% of vaccinees (106 adolescents, 104 children). Geometric mean concentrations tended to be higher after the 56-day interval (adolescents 13,532 ELISA units [EU]/mL, children 17,388 EU/mL) than the 28-day interval (adolescents 6,993 EU/mL, children 8,007 EU/mL). Humoral responses persisted at least up to Day 365. A limitation of the study is that the follow-up period was limited to 365 days for the majority of the participants, and so it was not possible to determine whether immune responses persisted beyond this time period. Additionally, formal statistical comparisons were not preplanned but were only performed post hoc. The heterologous 2-dose vaccination was well tolerated in African adolescents and children with no vaccine-related SAEs. All vaccinees displayed anti-EBOV GP antibodies after the 2-dose regimen, with higher responses in the 56-day interval groups. The frequency of pyrexia after vaccine or placebo was higher in children than in adolescents. These data supported the prophylactic indication against EBOV disease in a paediatric population, as licenced in the EU. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02564523.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Reoccurring Ebola outbreaks in West and Central Africa have led to serious illness and death in thousands of adults and children. The objective of this study was to assess safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of the heterologous 2-dose Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo vaccination regimen in adolescents and children in Africa.
METHODS AND FINDINGS
In this multicentre, randomised, observer-blind, placebo-controlled Phase II study, 131 adolescents (12 to 17 years old) and 132 children (4 to 11 years old) were enrolled from Eastern and Western Africa and randomised 5:1 to receive study vaccines or placebo. Vaccine groups received intramuscular injections of Ad26.ZEBOV (5 × 1010 viral particles) and MVA-BN-Filo (1 × 108 infectious units) 28 or 56 days apart; placebo recipients received saline. Primary outcomes were safety and tolerability. Solicited adverse events (AEs) were recorded until 7 days after each vaccination and serious AEs (SAEs) throughout the study. Secondary and exploratory outcomes were humoral immune responses (binding and neutralising Ebola virus [EBOV] glycoprotein [GP]-specific antibodies), up to 1 year after the first dose. Enrolment began on February 26, 2016, and the date of last participant last visit was November 28, 2018. Of the 263 participants enrolled, 217 (109 adolescents, 108 children) received the 2-dose regimen, and 43 (20 adolescents, 23 children) received 2 placebo doses. Median age was 14.0 (range 11 to 17) and 7.0 (range 4 to 11) years for adolescents and children, respectively. Fifty-four percent of the adolescents and 51% of the children were male. All participants were Africans, and, although there was a slight male preponderance overall, the groups were well balanced. No vaccine-related SAEs were reported; solicited AEs were mostly mild/moderate. Twenty-one days post-MVA-BN-Filo vaccination, binding antibody responses against EBOV GP were observed in 100% of vaccinees (106 adolescents, 104 children). Geometric mean concentrations tended to be higher after the 56-day interval (adolescents 13,532 ELISA units [EU]/mL, children 17,388 EU/mL) than the 28-day interval (adolescents 6,993 EU/mL, children 8,007 EU/mL). Humoral responses persisted at least up to Day 365. A limitation of the study is that the follow-up period was limited to 365 days for the majority of the participants, and so it was not possible to determine whether immune responses persisted beyond this time period. Additionally, formal statistical comparisons were not preplanned but were only performed post hoc.
CONCLUSIONS
The heterologous 2-dose vaccination was well tolerated in African adolescents and children with no vaccine-related SAEs. All vaccinees displayed anti-EBOV GP antibodies after the 2-dose regimen, with higher responses in the 56-day interval groups. The frequency of pyrexia after vaccine or placebo was higher in children than in adolescents. These data supported the prophylactic indication against EBOV disease in a paediatric population, as licenced in the EU.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02564523.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35015777
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003865
pii: PMEDICINE-D-21-02242
pmc: PMC8752100
doi:
Substances chimiques
Ebola Vaccines
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02564523']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1003865Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: ZA, HB, CB, LR, CL and RT report grants from IMI2-2 [Grant Agreement EBOVAC2 (No.115861) from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking which receives support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme] during the conduct of the study. SBS reports grants from Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V. during the conduct of the study. MK was a full-time employee of Janssen, Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson at the time of the study. GS, CR, AG, DH, VB, KL, ML and MD were full-time employees of Janssen, Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson at the time of the study, and may own shares in Janssen, Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson. All other authors have nothing to disclose.
Références
J Virol Methods. 2018 May;255:84-90
pubmed: 29481881
JAMA. 2016 Apr 19;315(15):1610-23
pubmed: 27092831
Lancet. 2017 Feb 4;389(10068):505-518
pubmed: 28017403
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Jan;22(1):97-109
pubmed: 34529963
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 29;110(5):1893-8
pubmed: 23319647
Trends Microbiol. 2019 Jan;27(1):8-16
pubmed: 30201511
NPJ Vaccines. 2020 Dec 17;5(1):112
pubmed: 33335092
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 7;374(1):33-42
pubmed: 26735992
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;21(4):493-506
pubmed: 33217361
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Jan;22(1):110-122
pubmed: 34529962
N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 16;371(16):1481-95
pubmed: 25244186
Science. 2016 Mar 18;351(6279):1339-42
pubmed: 26917593
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Dec;168(12):1087-8
pubmed: 25325785
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2018 Dec 1;112(12):527-528
pubmed: 30137538
Nature. 2014 Oct 2;514(7520):47-53
pubmed: 25171469
J Infect Dis. 2019 Jun 5;220(1):46-56
pubmed: 30796818
J Infect Dis. 2020 Sep 16;:
pubmed: 32939546
PLoS Med. 2021 Oct 29;18(10):e1003813
pubmed: 34714820
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 20;13(2):e0192312
pubmed: 29462200
J Virol. 2019 Aug 28;93(18):
pubmed: 31243126
J Infect Dis. 2019 Jun 5;220(1):57-67
pubmed: 30796816
J Immunol Methods. 2007 May 31;323(1):39-54
pubmed: 17451739