German emergency department measures in 2018: a status quo based on the Utstein reporting standard.


Journal

BMC emergency medicine
ISSN: 1471-227X
Titre abrégé: BMC Emerg Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968543

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 01 2022
Historique:
received: 15 10 2021
accepted: 13 12 2021
entrez: 12 1 2022
pubmed: 13 1 2022
medline: 19 4 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Compelling data on clinical emergency medicine is required for healthcare system management. The aim of this survey was to describe the nationwide status quo of emergency care in Germany at the healthcare system level using the Utstein reporting template as the guideline to measure the data collected. This cross-sectional survey collected standardized data from German EDs in 2018. All 759 of the EDs listed in a previously collected ED Directory were contacted in November 2019 using the online-survey tool SoSci Survey. Exclusively descriptive statistical analyses were performed. Absolute as well as relative frequencies, medians, means, ranges, standard deviations (SD) and interquartile ranges (IQR) were reported depending on distribution. A total of 150 questionnaires of contacted EDs were evaluated (response rate: 19.8%). Hospitals had a median of 403 inpatient beds (n=147). The EDs recorded a median of 30,000 patient contacts (n=136). Eighty-three EDs (55%) had observation units with a median of six beds. The special patient groups were pediatric patients (< 5 years) and older patients (> 75 years) with a median of 1.7% and 25%, respectively. Outpatients accounted for 55%, while 45% were admitted (intensive care unit 5.0%, standard care unit 32.3%, observation unit 6.3%) and 1.2% transferred to another hospital. The use of the Utstein reporting template enabled the collection of ED descriptive parameters in Germany. The data can provide a baseline for upcoming reforms on German emergency medicine, and for international comparisons on admission rates, initial triage categories, and patient populations.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Compelling data on clinical emergency medicine is required for healthcare system management. The aim of this survey was to describe the nationwide status quo of emergency care in Germany at the healthcare system level using the Utstein reporting template as the guideline to measure the data collected.
METHODS
This cross-sectional survey collected standardized data from German EDs in 2018. All 759 of the EDs listed in a previously collected ED Directory were contacted in November 2019 using the online-survey tool SoSci Survey. Exclusively descriptive statistical analyses were performed. Absolute as well as relative frequencies, medians, means, ranges, standard deviations (SD) and interquartile ranges (IQR) were reported depending on distribution.
MAIN RESULTS
A total of 150 questionnaires of contacted EDs were evaluated (response rate: 19.8%). Hospitals had a median of 403 inpatient beds (n=147). The EDs recorded a median of 30,000 patient contacts (n=136). Eighty-three EDs (55%) had observation units with a median of six beds. The special patient groups were pediatric patients (< 5 years) and older patients (> 75 years) with a median of 1.7% and 25%, respectively. Outpatients accounted for 55%, while 45% were admitted (intensive care unit 5.0%, standard care unit 32.3%, observation unit 6.3%) and 1.2% transferred to another hospital.
CONCLUSIONS
The use of the Utstein reporting template enabled the collection of ED descriptive parameters in Germany. The data can provide a baseline for upcoming reforms on German emergency medicine, and for international comparisons on admission rates, initial triage categories, and patient populations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35016633
doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00563-8
pii: 10.1186/s12873-021-00563-8
pmc: PMC8753932
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

5

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

PLoS One. 2018 Jun 14;13(6):e0198474
pubmed: 29902197
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Aug;18(8):822-9
pubmed: 21843217
Int J Emerg Med. 2013 Jul 10;6(1):23
pubmed: 23842482
PLoS One. 2016 May 03;11(5):e0154344
pubmed: 27138492
Gesundheitswesen. 2020 Mar;82(S 01):S72-S82
pubmed: 31597189
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2020 Nov;115(8):668-681
pubmed: 31197419
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2020 Dec 21;:
pubmed: 33346852
Eur J Emerg Med. 2019 Dec;26(6):417-422
pubmed: 31464714
Eur J Emerg Med. 2013 Jun;20(3):205-9
pubmed: 22668810

Auteurs

Florian Wallstab (F)

Department of Trauma Surgery, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany. florian.wallstab@st.ovgu.de.

Felix Greiner (F)

Department of Trauma Surgery, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

Wiebke Schirrmeister (W)

Department of Trauma Surgery, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

Markus Wehrle (M)

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

Felix Walcher (F)

Department of Trauma Surgery, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

Christian Wrede (C)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany.

Kirsten Habbinga (K)

Department of Interdisciplinary Emergency Medicine, Pius-Hospital, Oldenburg, Germany.

Wilhelm Behringer (W)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Dominik Brammen (D)

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH