Comparative efficacy of two pyrethroid-piperonyl butoxide nets (Olyset Plus and PermaNet 3.0) against pyrethroid resistant malaria vectors: a non-inferiority assessment.

Anopheles Benin Cove Cove Benin Experimental huts Insecticide resistance Insecticide-treated nets LLIN Long-lasting insecticidal nets Mixture Next generation nets Olyset Olyset plus PBO PermaNet 3.0 Piperonyl butoxide Pyrethroid resistance Pyrethroid-PBO

Journal

Malaria journal
ISSN: 1475-2875
Titre abrégé: Malar J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101139802

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Jan 2022
Historique:
received: 20 05 2021
accepted: 03 01 2022
entrez: 12 1 2022
pubmed: 13 1 2022
medline: 27 1 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Pyrethroid-PBO nets were conditionally recommended for control of malaria transmitted by mosquitoes with oxidase-based pyrethroid-resistance based on epidemiological evidence of additional protective effect with Olyset Plus compared to a pyrethroid-only net (Olyset Net). Entomological studies can be used to assess the comparative performance of other brands of pyrethroid-PBO ITNs to Olyset Plus. An experimental hut trial was performed in Cové, Benin to compare PermaNet 3.0 (deltamethrin plus PBO on roof panel only) to Olyset Plus (permethrin plus PBO on all panels) against wild pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles gambiae sensu lato (s.l.) following World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. Both nets were tested unwashed and after 20 standardized washes compared to Olyset Net. Laboratory bioassays were also performed to help explain findings in the experimental huts. With unwashed nets, mosquito mortality was higher in huts with PermaNet 3.0 compared to Olyset Plus (41% vs. 28%, P < 0.001). After 20 washes, mortality declined significantly with PermaNet 3.0 (41% unwashed vs. 17% after washing P < 0.001), but not with Olyset Plus (28% unwashed vs. 24% after washing P = 0.433); Olyset Plus induced significantly higher mortality than PermaNet 3.0 and Olyset Net after 20 washes. PermaNet 3.0 showed a higher wash retention of PBO compared to Olyset Plus. A non-inferiority analysis performed with data from unwashed and washed nets together using a margin recommended by the WHO, showed that PermaNet 3.0 was non-inferior to Olyset Plus in terms of mosquito mortality (25% with Olyset Plus vs. 27% with PermaNet 3.0, OR = 1.528, 95%CI = 1.02-2.29) but not in reducing mosquito feeding (25% with Olyset Plus vs. 30% with PermaNet 3.0, OR = 1.192, 95%CI = 0.77-1.84). Both pyrethroid-PBO nets were superior to Olyset Net. Olyset Plus outperformed PermaNet 3.0 in terms of its ability to cause greater margins of improved mosquito mortality compared to a standard pyrethroid net, after multiple standardized washes. However, using a margin of non-inferiority defined by the WHO, PermaNet 3.0 was non-inferior to Olyset Plus in inducing mosquito mortality. Considering the low levels of mortality observed and increasing pyrethroid-resistance in West Africa, it is unclear whether either of these nets would demonstrate the same epidemiological impact observed in community trials in East Africa.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Pyrethroid-PBO nets were conditionally recommended for control of malaria transmitted by mosquitoes with oxidase-based pyrethroid-resistance based on epidemiological evidence of additional protective effect with Olyset Plus compared to a pyrethroid-only net (Olyset Net). Entomological studies can be used to assess the comparative performance of other brands of pyrethroid-PBO ITNs to Olyset Plus.
METHODS METHODS
An experimental hut trial was performed in Cové, Benin to compare PermaNet 3.0 (deltamethrin plus PBO on roof panel only) to Olyset Plus (permethrin plus PBO on all panels) against wild pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles gambiae sensu lato (s.l.) following World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. Both nets were tested unwashed and after 20 standardized washes compared to Olyset Net. Laboratory bioassays were also performed to help explain findings in the experimental huts.
RESULTS RESULTS
With unwashed nets, mosquito mortality was higher in huts with PermaNet 3.0 compared to Olyset Plus (41% vs. 28%, P < 0.001). After 20 washes, mortality declined significantly with PermaNet 3.0 (41% unwashed vs. 17% after washing P < 0.001), but not with Olyset Plus (28% unwashed vs. 24% after washing P = 0.433); Olyset Plus induced significantly higher mortality than PermaNet 3.0 and Olyset Net after 20 washes. PermaNet 3.0 showed a higher wash retention of PBO compared to Olyset Plus. A non-inferiority analysis performed with data from unwashed and washed nets together using a margin recommended by the WHO, showed that PermaNet 3.0 was non-inferior to Olyset Plus in terms of mosquito mortality (25% with Olyset Plus vs. 27% with PermaNet 3.0, OR = 1.528, 95%CI = 1.02-2.29) but not in reducing mosquito feeding (25% with Olyset Plus vs. 30% with PermaNet 3.0, OR = 1.192, 95%CI = 0.77-1.84). Both pyrethroid-PBO nets were superior to Olyset Net.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Olyset Plus outperformed PermaNet 3.0 in terms of its ability to cause greater margins of improved mosquito mortality compared to a standard pyrethroid net, after multiple standardized washes. However, using a margin of non-inferiority defined by the WHO, PermaNet 3.0 was non-inferior to Olyset Plus in inducing mosquito mortality. Considering the low levels of mortality observed and increasing pyrethroid-resistance in West Africa, it is unclear whether either of these nets would demonstrate the same epidemiological impact observed in community trials in East Africa.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35016676
doi: 10.1186/s12936-022-04041-9
pii: 10.1186/s12936-022-04041-9
pmc: PMC8753866
doi:

Substances chimiques

Pyrethrins 0
Piperonyl Butoxide LWK91TU9AH

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

20

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/L004437/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/R015600/1
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Malar J. 2018 Jan 18;17(1):39
pubmed: 29347953
Lancet. 2020 Apr 18;395(10232):1292-1303
pubmed: 32305094
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Jan 06;368(1612):20120429
pubmed: 23297352
Trends Parasitol. 2016 Mar;32(3):187-196
pubmed: 26826784
Med Vet Entomol. 2000 Mar;14(1):1-5
pubmed: 10759305
Elife. 2016 Aug 22;5:
pubmed: 27547988
Sci Rep. 2015 Sep 01;5:13392
pubmed: 26323965
PLoS Biol. 2020 Jun 25;18(6):e3000633
pubmed: 32584814
Parasit Vectors. 2019 Nov 15;12(1):544
pubmed: 31730481
Lancet. 2018 Apr 21;391(10130):1577-1588
pubmed: 29655496
Trop Med Int Health. 2002 Dec;7(12):1003-8
pubmed: 12460390
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 23;14(12):e0226191
pubmed: 31869350
Malar J. 2010 Jan 19;9:21
pubmed: 20085631
Malar J. 2015 Nov 18;14:464
pubmed: 26581678
Infect Dis Poverty. 2017 Jan 18;6(1):11
pubmed: 28095897
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2009 Jun;25(2):156-67
pubmed: 19653497
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Dec;104(12):758-65
pubmed: 20956008
Malar J. 2010 Apr 27;9:113
pubmed: 20423479
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 08;8(10):e75134
pubmed: 24116029

Auteurs

Corine Ngufor (C)

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, UK. corine.ngufor@lshtm.ac.uk.
Centre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Benin. corine.ngufor@lshtm.ac.uk.
Pan African Malaria Vector Research Consortium (PAMVERC), Cotonou, Benin. corine.ngufor@lshtm.ac.uk.

Josias Fagbohoun (J)

Centre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Benin.
Pan African Malaria Vector Research Consortium (PAMVERC), Cotonou, Benin.

Abel Agbevo (A)

Centre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Benin.
Pan African Malaria Vector Research Consortium (PAMVERC), Cotonou, Benin.

Hanafy Ismail (H)

Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.

Joseph D Challenger (JD)

MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, UK.

Thomas S Churcher (TS)

MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, UK.

Mark Rowland (M)

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, UK.
Pan African Malaria Vector Research Consortium (PAMVERC), Cotonou, Benin.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH