Investigation of biases in convolutional neural networks for semantic segmentation using performance sensitivity analysis.

Convolutional neural network Data augmentation Semantic image segmentation Sensitivity analysis

Journal

Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik
ISSN: 1876-4436
Titre abrégé: Z Med Phys
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 100886455

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2022
Historique:
received: 06 09 2021
revised: 31 10 2021
accepted: 12 11 2021
pubmed: 13 1 2022
medline: 4 10 2022
entrez: 12 1 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The application of deep neural networks for segmentation in medical imaging has gained substantial interest in recent years. In many cases, this variant of machine learning has been shown to outperform other conventional segmentation approaches. However, little is known about its general applicability. Especially the robustness against image modifications (e.g., intensity variations, contrast variations, spatial alignment) has hardly been investigated. Data augmentation is often used to compensate for sensitivity to such changes, although its effectiveness has not yet been studied. Therefore, the goal of this study was to systematically investigate the sensitivity to variations in input data with respect to segmentation of medical images using deep learning. This approach was tested with two publicly available segmentation frameworks (DeepMedic and TractSeg). In the case of DeepMedic, the performance was tested using ground truth data, while in the case of TractSeg, the STAPLE technique was employed. In both cases, sensitivity analysis revealed significant dependence of the segmentation performance on input variations. The effects of different data augmentation strategies were also shown, making this type of analysis a useful tool for selecting the right parameters for augmentation. The proposed analysis should be applied to any deep learning image segmentation approach, unless the assessment of sensitivity to input variations can be directly derived from the network.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35016819
pii: S0939-3889(21)00109-4
doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2021.11.004
pmc: PMC9948839
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

346-360

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Références

Neuroimage. 2018 Dec;183:239-253
pubmed: 30086412
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998 Feb;17(1):87-97
pubmed: 9617910
Z Med Phys. 2019 May;29(2):128-138
pubmed: 30579766
Neuroimage. 2016 Nov 15;142:394-406
pubmed: 27523449
Med Image Anal. 2017 Feb;36:61-78
pubmed: 27865153
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Jan;31(1):192-203
pubmed: 20027588
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020 May;24(5):1413-1426
pubmed: 31567104
Neuroimage. 2003 Oct;20(2):870-88
pubmed: 14568458
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2021 Aug;16(8):1277-1285
pubmed: 33934313
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012 Feb;31(2):153-63
pubmed: 21827972
Med Image Anal. 2017 Dec;42:60-88
pubmed: 28778026
Z Med Phys. 2019 May;29(2):86-101
pubmed: 30686613
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016 May;35(5):1285-98
pubmed: 26886976
Artif Intell Med. 2019 Apr;95:64-81
pubmed: 30195984
Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 15;125:1063-1078
pubmed: 26481672
Neuroimage. 2014 Dec;103:411-426
pubmed: 25109526
J Med Syst. 2018 Oct 8;42(11):226
pubmed: 30298337
Z Med Phys. 2019 May;29(2):102-127
pubmed: 30553609
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2004 Jul;23(7):903-21
pubmed: 15250643
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2020 Dec;15(12):1975-1988
pubmed: 32989680
Neuroimage. 2013 Oct 15;80:62-79
pubmed: 23684880
Neuroimage. 2012 Oct 15;63(1):569-80
pubmed: 22732564
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 14;10(1):6423
pubmed: 32286358
Psychiatry Res. 2015 Sep 30;233(3):299-305
pubmed: 26211622
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2019 Oct;14(10):1741-1750
pubmed: 31378841
Front Neurosci. 2020 Dec 18;14:609468
pubmed: 33390890
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2021 May;68(5):1518-1526
pubmed: 33275574
Artif Intell Med. 2020 Sep;109:101938
pubmed: 34756215
Z Med Phys. 2020 Nov;30(4):305-314
pubmed: 32564924
Neuroimage. 2006 Oct 15;33(1):127-38
pubmed: 16904911
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):774-81
pubmed: 22248573

Auteurs

Daniel Güllmar (D)

Medical Physics Group, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany. Electronic address: daniel.guellmar@med.uni-jena.de.

Nina Jacobsen (N)

Medical Physics Group, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany.

Andreas Deistung (A)

University Clinic and Outpatient Clinic for Radiology, Department for Radiation Medicine, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Germany.

Dagmar Timmann (D)

Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.

Stefan Ropele (S)

Department of Neurology, Karl-Franzens University of Graz, Austria.

Jürgen R Reichenbach (JR)

Medical Physics Group, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany; Michael Stifel Center Jena for Data-Driven and Simulation Science, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.

Articles similaires

Exploring blood-brain barrier passage using atomic weighted vector and machine learning.

Yoan Martínez-López, Paulina Phoobane, Yanaima Jauriga et al.
1.00
Blood-Brain Barrier Machine Learning Humans Support Vector Machine Software

Understanding the role of machine learning in predicting progression of osteoarthritis.

Simone Castagno, Benjamin Gompels, Estelle Strangmark et al.
1.00
Humans Disease Progression Machine Learning Osteoarthritis
1.00
Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Infant, Newborn Infant, Premature
Cephalometry Humans Anatomic Landmarks Software Internet

Classifications MeSH