Neutrophil-lymphoycyte-ratio, platelet-lymphocyte-ratio and procalcitonin for early assessment of prognosis in patients undergoing VA-ECMO.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 01 2022
11 01 2022
Historique:
received:
03
08
2021
accepted:
06
12
2021
entrez:
12
1
2022
pubmed:
13
1
2022
medline:
25
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is increasing, but mortality remains high. Early assessment of prognosis is challenging and valid markers are lacking. This study aimed to investigate Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), Platelet-Lymphocyte-Ratio (PLR) and Procalcitonin (PCT) for early assessment of prognosis in patients undergoing VA-ECMO. This retrospective single-center cohort study included 344 consecutive patients ≥ 18 years who underwent VA-ECMO due to cardiogenic shock. Main exposures were NLR, PLR and PCT measured within 24 h after VA-ECMO initiation. The primary endpoint was all-cause in-hospital mortality. In total, 92 patients were included into final analysis (71.7% male, age 57 ± 14 years). In-hospital mortality rate was 48.9%. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.65 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-0.76] for NLR. The AUCs of PLR and PCT were 0.47 [95%CI 0.35-0.59] and 0.54 [95%CI 0.42-0.66], respectively. Binary logistic regression showed an adjusted odds ratio of 3.32 [95%CI 1.13-9.76] for NLR, 1.0 [95%CI 0.998-1.002] for PLR and 1.02 [95%CI 0.99-1.05] for PCT. NLR is independently associated with in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing VA-ECMO. However, discriminative ability is weak. PLR and PCT seem not to be suitable for this purpose.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35017601
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04519-7
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-04519-7
pmc: PMC8752603
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
542Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Resuscitation. 2017 Dec;121:151-157
pubmed: 28870718
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jul 14;37(27):2129-2200
pubmed: 27206819
Chonnam Med J. 2018 Jan;54(1):48-54
pubmed: 29399566
Biomarkers. 2018 Jul;23(5):407-413
pubmed: 29465002
J Thorac Dis. 2020 May;12(5):2507-2516
pubmed: 32642158
Perfusion. 2018 Oct;33(7):562-567
pubmed: 29701504
Circ Heart Fail. 2018 Sep;11(9):e004905
pubmed: 30354364
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jun;155(6):2471-2476
pubmed: 29395201
Ann Intensive Care. 2016 Dec;6(1):116
pubmed: 27878573
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Feb;122(2):180-187
pubmed: 30686303
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 12;8(1):10566
pubmed: 30002404
J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Oct;54(10):979-85
pubmed: 11576808
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2019 Jul 25;7(Suppl 1):46
pubmed: 31346840
Int Angiol. 2018 Feb;37(1):4-11
pubmed: 28541022
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Mar;10(3):1406-1417
pubmed: 29707290
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Nov;90(5):1541-6
pubmed: 20971259
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Sep 15;102(6):653-7
pubmed: 18773982
Eur Heart J. 2015 Sep 1;36(33):2246-56
pubmed: 26033984
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 8;15(4):e0231505
pubmed: 32268348
Cardiol Young. 2021 Jun;31(6):1003-1008
pubmed: 34018477
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Jul 19;8:689218
pubmed: 34350217
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2021 Feb;116(1):56-58
pubmed: 33146748
JAMA. 2009 Sep 9;302(10):1059-66
pubmed: 19738090
Crit Care Med. 2021 Jul 1;49(7):1107-1117
pubmed: 33729722
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Apr;69(3):263-270
pubmed: 32035427