Co-creating a local environmental epidemiology study: the case of citizen science for investigating air pollution and related health risks in Barcelona, Spain.
Air pollution
Citizen science
Civic concerns
Co-creation workshop
Environmental health
Epidemiology
Online survey
Participatory research
Study design
Journal
Environmental health : a global access science source
ISSN: 1476-069X
Titre abrégé: Environ Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101147645
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 01 2022
12 01 2022
Historique:
received:
06
05
2021
accepted:
26
12
2021
entrez:
13
1
2022
pubmed:
14
1
2022
medline:
4
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
While the health risks of air pollution attract considerable attention, both scholarly and within the general population, citizens are rarely involved in environmental health research, beyond participating as data subjects. Co-created citizen science is an approach that fosters collaboration between scientists and lay people to engage the latter in all phases of research. Currently, this approach is rare in environmental epidemiology and when co-creation processes do take place, they are often not documented. This paper describes the first stages of an ongoing co-created citizen science epidemiological project in Barcelona (Spain), that included identifying topics that citizens wish to investigate as regards air pollution and health, formulating their concerns into research questions and co-designing the study protocol. This paper also reflects key trade-offs between scientific rigor and public engagement and provides suggestions to consider when applying citizen science to environmental health studies. Experts created an online survey and analyzed responses with descriptive statistics and qualitative coding. A pop-up intervention was held to discuss with citizens their concerns about air pollution and health. Later on, a community meeting was organized to narrow down the research topics and list potential research questions. In an online survey, citizens were asked to vote for the research question they would like to investigate with the experts. A workshop was held to choose a study design in which citizens would like to partake to answer their preferred research question. According to 488 respondents from the first survey, cognitive and mental health were the main priorities of investigation. Based on the second survey, with 27% of the votes from 556 citizens, the most popular research question was, "How does air pollution together with noise and green/blue spaces affect mental health?". The study design selected was an observational study in which citizens provide daily repeated measures of different cognitive and mental health outcomes and relate them to the air pollution concentrations. Based on the co-creation activities and the results obtained, we conclude that applying citizen science in an environmental health project is valuable for researchers despite some challenges such as engaging citizens and maximizing representativity.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
While the health risks of air pollution attract considerable attention, both scholarly and within the general population, citizens are rarely involved in environmental health research, beyond participating as data subjects. Co-created citizen science is an approach that fosters collaboration between scientists and lay people to engage the latter in all phases of research. Currently, this approach is rare in environmental epidemiology and when co-creation processes do take place, they are often not documented. This paper describes the first stages of an ongoing co-created citizen science epidemiological project in Barcelona (Spain), that included identifying topics that citizens wish to investigate as regards air pollution and health, formulating their concerns into research questions and co-designing the study protocol. This paper also reflects key trade-offs between scientific rigor and public engagement and provides suggestions to consider when applying citizen science to environmental health studies.
METHODS
Experts created an online survey and analyzed responses with descriptive statistics and qualitative coding. A pop-up intervention was held to discuss with citizens their concerns about air pollution and health. Later on, a community meeting was organized to narrow down the research topics and list potential research questions. In an online survey, citizens were asked to vote for the research question they would like to investigate with the experts. A workshop was held to choose a study design in which citizens would like to partake to answer their preferred research question.
RESULTS
According to 488 respondents from the first survey, cognitive and mental health were the main priorities of investigation. Based on the second survey, with 27% of the votes from 556 citizens, the most popular research question was, "How does air pollution together with noise and green/blue spaces affect mental health?". The study design selected was an observational study in which citizens provide daily repeated measures of different cognitive and mental health outcomes and relate them to the air pollution concentrations.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the co-creation activities and the results obtained, we conclude that applying citizen science in an environmental health project is valuable for researchers despite some challenges such as engaging citizens and maximizing representativity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35022033
doi: 10.1186/s12940-021-00826-8
pii: 10.1186/s12940-021-00826-8
pmc: PMC8753829
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
11Subventions
Organisme : European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme
ID : 824484
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Nat Commun. 2019 Mar 15;10(1):1236
pubmed: 30874557
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:335-350
pubmed: 29608871
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:325-50
pubmed: 18173388
Environ Monit Assess. 2017 Aug;189(8):378
pubmed: 28685368
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 30;16(23):
pubmed: 31801242
Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Apr;109(4):341-7
pubmed: 11335181
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;42(4):1012-4
pubmed: 24062287
Circulation. 2010 Jun 1;121(21):2331-78
pubmed: 20458016
Environ Int. 2021 Jul;152:106470
pubmed: 33677244
Public Health. 2017 Jan;142:177-185
pubmed: 26298585
Lancet. 2017 May 13;389(10082):1907-1918
pubmed: 28408086
Transl J Am Coll Sports Med. 2016 May 15;1(4):30-44
pubmed: 27525309
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 03;17(17):
pubmed: 32899325
Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Mar;108(3):213-8
pubmed: 10706526
Am J Public Health. 2008 Aug;98(8):1390-7
pubmed: 18556620
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Jun 20;51(12):6648-6664
pubmed: 28541679
Eur Respir J. 2017 Jan 11;49(1):
pubmed: 28077473