Web-Based Problem-solving Training With and Without Peer Support in Veterans With Unmet Mental Health Needs: Pilot Study of Feasibility, User Acceptability, and Participant Engagement.


Journal

Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 01 2022
Historique:
received: 12 04 2021
accepted: 14 10 2021
revised: 13 08 2021
entrez: 13 1 2022
pubmed: 14 1 2022
medline: 27 1 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

eHealth tools have the potential to meet the mental health needs of individuals who experience barriers to accessing in-person treatment. However, most users have less than optimal engagement with eHealth tools. Coaching from peer specialists may increase their engagement with eHealth. This pilot study aims to test the feasibility and acceptability of a novel, completely automated web-based system to recruit, screen, enroll, assess, randomize, and then deliver an intervention to a national sample of military veterans with unmet mental health needs; investigate whether phone-based peer support increases the use of web-based problem-solving training compared with self-directed use; and generate hypotheses about potential mechanisms of action for problem-solving and peer support for future full-scale research. Veterans (N=81) with unmet mental health needs were recruited via social media advertising and enrolled and randomized to the self-directed use of a web-based problem-solving training called Moving Forward (28/81, 35%), peer-supported Moving Forward (27/81, 33%), or waitlist control (26/81, 32%). The objective use of Moving Forward was measured with the number of log-ins. Participants completed pre- and poststudy measures of mental health symptoms and problem-solving confidence. Satisfaction was also assessed post treatment. Automated recruitment, enrollment, and initial assessment methods were feasible and resulted in a diverse sample of veterans with unmet mental health needs from 38 states. Automated follow-up methods resulted in 46% (37/81) of participants completing follow-up assessments. Peer support was delivered with high fidelity and was associated with favorable participant satisfaction. Participants randomized to receive peer support had significantly more Moving Forward log-ins than those of self-directed Moving Forward participants, and those who received peer support had a greater decrease in depression. Problem-solving confidence was associated with greater Moving Forward use and improvements in mental health symptoms among participants both with and without peer support. Enrolling and assessing individuals in eHealth studies without human contact is feasible; however, different methods or designs are necessary to achieve acceptable participant engagement and follow-up rates. Peer support shows potential for increasing engagement in web-based interventions and reducing symptoms. Future research should investigate when and for whom peer support for eHealth is helpful. Problem-solving confidence should be further investigated as a mechanism of action for web-based problem-solving training. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03555435; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03555435.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
eHealth tools have the potential to meet the mental health needs of individuals who experience barriers to accessing in-person treatment. However, most users have less than optimal engagement with eHealth tools. Coaching from peer specialists may increase their engagement with eHealth.
OBJECTIVE
This pilot study aims to test the feasibility and acceptability of a novel, completely automated web-based system to recruit, screen, enroll, assess, randomize, and then deliver an intervention to a national sample of military veterans with unmet mental health needs; investigate whether phone-based peer support increases the use of web-based problem-solving training compared with self-directed use; and generate hypotheses about potential mechanisms of action for problem-solving and peer support for future full-scale research.
METHODS
Veterans (N=81) with unmet mental health needs were recruited via social media advertising and enrolled and randomized to the self-directed use of a web-based problem-solving training called Moving Forward (28/81, 35%), peer-supported Moving Forward (27/81, 33%), or waitlist control (26/81, 32%). The objective use of Moving Forward was measured with the number of log-ins. Participants completed pre- and poststudy measures of mental health symptoms and problem-solving confidence. Satisfaction was also assessed post treatment.
RESULTS
Automated recruitment, enrollment, and initial assessment methods were feasible and resulted in a diverse sample of veterans with unmet mental health needs from 38 states. Automated follow-up methods resulted in 46% (37/81) of participants completing follow-up assessments. Peer support was delivered with high fidelity and was associated with favorable participant satisfaction. Participants randomized to receive peer support had significantly more Moving Forward log-ins than those of self-directed Moving Forward participants, and those who received peer support had a greater decrease in depression. Problem-solving confidence was associated with greater Moving Forward use and improvements in mental health symptoms among participants both with and without peer support.
CONCLUSIONS
Enrolling and assessing individuals in eHealth studies without human contact is feasible; however, different methods or designs are necessary to achieve acceptable participant engagement and follow-up rates. Peer support shows potential for increasing engagement in web-based interventions and reducing symptoms. Future research should investigate when and for whom peer support for eHealth is helpful. Problem-solving confidence should be further investigated as a mechanism of action for web-based problem-solving training.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03555435; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03555435.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35023846
pii: v24i1e29559
doi: 10.2196/29559
pmc: PMC8796046
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03555435']

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e29559

Subventions

Organisme : HSRD VA
ID : I21 HX002361
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

©Kyle Possemato, Justina Wu, Carolyn Greene, Rex MacQueen, Daniel Blonigen, Michael Wade, Jason Owen, Terence Keane, Deborah Brief, Steven Lindley, Annabel Prins, Margaret-Anne Mackintosh, Eve Carlson. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 13.01.2022.

Références

J Psychosom Res. 2005 Feb;58(2):163-71
pubmed: 15820844
J Trauma Stress. 2018 Oct;31(5):742-752
pubmed: 30338576
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Mar 24;19(3):e90
pubmed: 28341617
Eval Program Plann. 1982;5(3):233-7
pubmed: 10259963
Interact J Med Res. 2017 Mar 23;6(1):e3
pubmed: 28336506
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Apr 3;7(4):e16460
pubmed: 32243256
J Rural Health. 2016 Sep;32(4):429-438
pubmed: 27557334
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Oct;1208:104-13
pubmed: 20955332
Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7
pubmed: 16717171
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
J Trauma Stress. 2007 Aug;20(4):517-27
pubmed: 17721959
Health Psychol. 2016 Nov;35(11):1178-1188
pubmed: 27280365
Assessment. 2001 Dec;8(4):431-41
pubmed: 11785587
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Sep 26;14:272
pubmed: 25252853
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Aug 1;65(8):1066-9
pubmed: 24882427
Am Psychol. 2021 Jan;76(1):26-38
pubmed: 33119331
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Aug 1;65(8):997-1004
pubmed: 24788253
Psychosomatics. 2009 Nov-Dec;50(6):613-21
pubmed: 19996233
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020 Jan;88(1):1-13
pubmed: 31697093
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2014 Mar;23(1):120-9
pubmed: 24431134
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Nov;26 Suppl 2:639-47
pubmed: 21989616
JMIR Ment Health. 2016 Aug 17;3(3):e38
pubmed: 27535468
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Apr 1;65(4):429-41
pubmed: 24549400
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Aug 05;13(3):e52
pubmed: 21821503
Implement Sci. 2019 Feb 1;14(1):11
pubmed: 30709368
J Med Internet Res. 2005 Mar 31;7(1):e11
pubmed: 15829473
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Mar 10;13(1):e30
pubmed: 21393123
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2008 Feb 02;2:57-65
pubmed: 19920945
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2019 Sep;42(3):305-313
pubmed: 30489140
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208
pubmed: 31078660
Mil Med. 2014 Nov;179(11):1218-22
pubmed: 25373044
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13
pubmed: 11556941

Auteurs

Kyle Possemato (K)

Veterans Affairs Center for Integrated Healthcare, Syracuse, NY, United States.

Justina Wu (J)

National Center for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, United States.

Carolyn Greene (C)

Veterans Affairs Office of Mental Health Services and Suicide Prevention, Washington, DC, United States.

Rex MacQueen (R)

Veterans Affairs Center for Integrated Healthcare, Syracuse, NY, United States.

Daniel Blonigen (D)

Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA, United States.

Michael Wade (M)

Veterans Affairs Center for Integrated Healthcare, Syracuse, NY, United States.

Jason Owen (J)

National Center for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, United States.

Terence Keane (T)

National Center for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, United States.

Deborah Brief (D)

National Center for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, United States.

Steven Lindley (S)

Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA, United States.

Annabel Prins (A)

National Center for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, United States.

Margaret-Anne Mackintosh (MA)

National Center for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, United States.

Eve Carlson (E)

National Center for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, United States.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH