Phytoremediation of nickel by quinoa: Morphological and physiological response.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
30
10
2021
accepted:
21
12
2021
entrez:
13
1
2022
pubmed:
14
1
2022
medline:
19
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The amount of soil contaminated with heavy metal increases due to urbanization, industrialization, and anthropogenic activities. Quinoa is considered a useful candidate in the remediation of such soil. In this pot experiment, the phytoextraction capacity of quinoa lines (A1, A2, A7, and A9) against different nickel (Ni) concentrations (0, 50, and 100 mg kg-1) were investigated. Required Ni concentrations were developed in polythene bags filled with sandy loam soil using nickel nitrate salt prior to two months of sowing and kept sealed up to sowing. Results showed that translocation of Ni increased from roots to shoots with an increase in soil Ni concentration in all lines. A2 line accumulated high Ni in leaf compared to the root as depicted by translocation factor 3.09 and 3.21 when grown at soil having 50 and 100 Ni mg kg-1, respectively. While, in the case of root, A7 accumulated high Ni followed by A9, A1, and A2, respectively. There was a 5-7% increased seed yield by 50 mg kg-1 Ni in all except A1 compared to control. However, growth and yield declined with a further increase in Ni level. The maximum reduction in yield was noticed in A9, which was strongly linked with poor physiological performance, e.g., chlorophyll a, b, and phenolic contents. Ni concentrations in the seed of all lines were within the permissible value set (67 ppm) by FAO/WHO. The result of the present study suggests that quinoa is a better accumulator of Ni. This species can provide the scope of decontamination of heavy metal polluted soil. The screened line can be used for future quinoa breeding programs for bioremediation and phytoextraction purpose.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35025916
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262309
pii: PONE-D-21-34655
pmc: PMC8757961
doi:
Substances chimiques
Metals, Heavy
0
Soil
0
Soil Pollutants
0
Cadmium
00BH33GNGH
Nickel
7OV03QG267
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Retracted Publication
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0262309Commentaires et corrections
Type : RetractionIn
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Food Chem Toxicol. 2013 Aug;58:449-58
pubmed: 23721688
Chemosphere. 2020 Jul;250:126308
pubmed: 32135439
Chemosphere. 2017 Jan;166:203-211
pubmed: 27697709
Physiol Plant. 2021 Sep;173(1):201-222
pubmed: 33547807
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020 Apr 15;193:110345
pubmed: 32092578
J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2005;18(4):339-53
pubmed: 16028496
Plant Physiol. 2006 Feb;140(2):433-43
pubmed: 16415214
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jul 15;630:275-286
pubmed: 29477825
Plants (Basel). 2018 Nov 29;7(4):
pubmed: 30501077
J Hazard Mater. 2010 Jan 15;173(1-3):737-43
pubmed: 19775811
Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2020 Aug 1;1862(8):183250
pubmed: 32126229
Antioxidants (Basel). 2020 Jul 29;9(8):
pubmed: 32751256
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019 May 30;173:366-372
pubmed: 30784800
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 24;10(4):e0123328
pubmed: 25909456
Plant Cell Physiol. 2020 Mar 1;61(3):519-535
pubmed: 31750920
Environ Geochem Health. 2021 Apr 27;:
pubmed: 33907913
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2018 Nov;132:641-651
pubmed: 30340176
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2007 May;78(5):319-24
pubmed: 17619800
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2013 Jun;92:271-80
pubmed: 23490193
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jun;28(21):27376-27390
pubmed: 33507502
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Mar 1;706:136013
pubmed: 31865000
Biology (Basel). 2020 Jul 21;9(7):
pubmed: 32708065
Plants (Basel). 2020 Mar 02;9(3):
pubmed: 32131526
Protoplasma. 2012 Jul;249(3):769-78
pubmed: 21979309
J Biol Chem. 2000 Apr 14;275(15):10731-7
pubmed: 10753863
Chemosphere. 2021 Mar;267:129205
pubmed: 33338709
Plant Physiol. 1949 Jan;24(1):1-15
pubmed: 16654194