Phytoremediation of nickel by quinoa: Morphological and physiological response.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 30 10 2021
accepted: 21 12 2021
entrez: 13 1 2022
pubmed: 14 1 2022
medline: 19 2 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The amount of soil contaminated with heavy metal increases due to urbanization, industrialization, and anthropogenic activities. Quinoa is considered a useful candidate in the remediation of such soil. In this pot experiment, the phytoextraction capacity of quinoa lines (A1, A2, A7, and A9) against different nickel (Ni) concentrations (0, 50, and 100 mg kg-1) were investigated. Required Ni concentrations were developed in polythene bags filled with sandy loam soil using nickel nitrate salt prior to two months of sowing and kept sealed up to sowing. Results showed that translocation of Ni increased from roots to shoots with an increase in soil Ni concentration in all lines. A2 line accumulated high Ni in leaf compared to the root as depicted by translocation factor 3.09 and 3.21 when grown at soil having 50 and 100 Ni mg kg-1, respectively. While, in the case of root, A7 accumulated high Ni followed by A9, A1, and A2, respectively. There was a 5-7% increased seed yield by 50 mg kg-1 Ni in all except A1 compared to control. However, growth and yield declined with a further increase in Ni level. The maximum reduction in yield was noticed in A9, which was strongly linked with poor physiological performance, e.g., chlorophyll a, b, and phenolic contents. Ni concentrations in the seed of all lines were within the permissible value set (67 ppm) by FAO/WHO. The result of the present study suggests that quinoa is a better accumulator of Ni. This species can provide the scope of decontamination of heavy metal polluted soil. The screened line can be used for future quinoa breeding programs for bioremediation and phytoextraction purpose.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35025916
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262309
pii: PONE-D-21-34655
pmc: PMC8757961
doi:

Substances chimiques

Metals, Heavy 0
Soil 0
Soil Pollutants 0
Cadmium 00BH33GNGH
Nickel 7OV03QG267

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Retracted Publication

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0262309

Commentaires et corrections

Type : RetractionIn

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Food Chem Toxicol. 2013 Aug;58:449-58
pubmed: 23721688
Chemosphere. 2020 Jul;250:126308
pubmed: 32135439
Chemosphere. 2017 Jan;166:203-211
pubmed: 27697709
Physiol Plant. 2021 Sep;173(1):201-222
pubmed: 33547807
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020 Apr 15;193:110345
pubmed: 32092578
J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2005;18(4):339-53
pubmed: 16028496
Plant Physiol. 2006 Feb;140(2):433-43
pubmed: 16415214
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jul 15;630:275-286
pubmed: 29477825
Plants (Basel). 2018 Nov 29;7(4):
pubmed: 30501077
J Hazard Mater. 2010 Jan 15;173(1-3):737-43
pubmed: 19775811
Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2020 Aug 1;1862(8):183250
pubmed: 32126229
Antioxidants (Basel). 2020 Jul 29;9(8):
pubmed: 32751256
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019 May 30;173:366-372
pubmed: 30784800
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 24;10(4):e0123328
pubmed: 25909456
Plant Cell Physiol. 2020 Mar 1;61(3):519-535
pubmed: 31750920
Environ Geochem Health. 2021 Apr 27;:
pubmed: 33907913
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2018 Nov;132:641-651
pubmed: 30340176
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2007 May;78(5):319-24
pubmed: 17619800
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2013 Jun;92:271-80
pubmed: 23490193
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jun;28(21):27376-27390
pubmed: 33507502
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Mar 1;706:136013
pubmed: 31865000
Biology (Basel). 2020 Jul 21;9(7):
pubmed: 32708065
Plants (Basel). 2020 Mar 02;9(3):
pubmed: 32131526
Protoplasma. 2012 Jul;249(3):769-78
pubmed: 21979309
J Biol Chem. 2000 Apr 14;275(15):10731-7
pubmed: 10753863
Chemosphere. 2021 Mar;267:129205
pubmed: 33338709
Plant Physiol. 1949 Jan;24(1):1-15
pubmed: 16654194

Auteurs

Muhammad Haseeb (M)

Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Shahid Iqbal (S)

Department of Agronomy, Muhammad Nawaz Shareef, University of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan.

Muhammad Bilal Hafeez (MB)

Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Muhammad Sohail Saddiq (MS)

Department of Agronomy, Ghazi University, Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan.

Noreen Zahra (N)

Department of Botany, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Ali Raza (A)

Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Molecular and Cell Biology, Oil Crops Research Institute, Centre of Legume Crop Genetics and Systems Biology/College of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.

Muhammad Usman Lbrahim (MU)

Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Javaid Iqbal (J)

Department of Agronomy, Ghazi University, Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan.

Muhammad Kamran (M)

Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Qasim Ali (Q)

Institute of Food and Agriculture Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.

Talha Javed (T)

College of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.

Hayssam M Ali (HM)

Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Manzer H Siddiqui (MH)

Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Articles similaires

Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi
Animals Humans Nickel Mice Immunotherapy
Nigeria Environmental Monitoring Solid Waste Waste Disposal Facilities Refuse Disposal
Cameroon Humans Uranium Trace Elements Environmental Monitoring

Classifications MeSH