Dynamic compression of water to conditions in ice giant interiors.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Jan 2022
13 Jan 2022
Historique:
received:
23
04
2021
accepted:
22
12
2021
entrez:
14
1
2022
pubmed:
15
1
2022
medline:
15
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Recent discoveries of water-rich Neptune-like exoplanets require a more detailed understanding of the phase diagram of H
Identifiants
pubmed: 35027608
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04687-6
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-04687-6
pmc: PMC8758754
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
715Subventions
Organisme : National Science Foundation Geophyiscs Program
ID : EAR0738873
Organisme : Laboratory Directed Research and Development
ID : LANL-Reines
Organisme : Fusion Energy Sciences
ID : ECA 2019
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Borucki, W. et al. Characteristics of planetary candidates observed by Kepler II. Analysis of the first four months of data. Astrophys. J. 736, 19 (2011).
doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/736/1/19
Connerney, J., Acuna, M. & Ness, N. The magnetic field of Neptune. J. Geophys. Res. 96, 19023–19042 (1991).
doi: 10.1029/91JA01165
Stanley, S. & Bloxham, J. Convective-region geometry as the cause of Uranus’ and Neptune’s unusual magnetic fields. Nature 428, 151–153 (2004).
doi: 10.1038/nature02376
Stanley, S. & Bloxham, J. Numerical dynamo models of Uranus’ and Neptune’s magnetic fields. Icarus 184, 556–572 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2006.05.005
Hubbard, W., Podolak, M. & Stevenson, D. Interior of Neptune. In Interior of Neptune and Triton (ed. Cruisshank, D.) 109–138 (University of Arizona Press, 1995).
Redmer, R., Mattsson, T., Nettelmann, N. & French, M. The phase diagram of water and the magnetic fields of Uranus and Neptune. Icarus 211, 798–803 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2010.08.008
Celliers, P. et al. Electronic conduction in shock-compressed water. Phys. Plasmas 11, L41–L44 (2004).
doi: 10.1063/1.1758944
Goldman, N., Fried, L., Kuo, I.-F. & Mundy, C. Bonding in the superionic phase of water. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 217801 (2005).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.217801
Wilson, H., Wong, M. & Militzer, B. Superionic to superionic phase change in water: Consequences for the interiors of Uranus and Neptune. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 151102 (2013).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.151102
Sun, J., Clark, B., Torquato, S. & Car, R. The phase diagram of high-pressure superionic ice. Nat. Commun. 6, 8156 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/ncomms9156
Hernandez, A. & Caracas, R. Superionic-superionic phase transitions in body-centered cubic H2O ice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 135503 (2016).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.135503
Benoit, M., Bernasconi, M., Focher, P. & Parrinello, M. New high-pressure phase of ice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2934 (1996).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.2934
Millot, M. et al. Experimental evidence for superionic water ice using shock compression. Nat. Phys. 14, 297–302 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41567-017-0017-4
Millot, M. et al. Nanosecond X-ray diffraction of shock-compressed superionic water ice. Nature 569, 251–255 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1114-6
Gleason, A. et al. Compression freezing kinetics of water to ice VII. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 025701 (2017).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.025701
Wojdyr, M. Fityk: A general-purpose peak fitting program. J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 1126–1128 (2010).
doi: 10.1107/S0021889810030499
Fei, Y. et al. Toward an internally consistent pressure scale. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 9182–9185 (2007).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609013104
Marsh, S. LASL Shock Hugoniot Data (University of California Press, 1980).
McWilliams, R. et al. Strength effects in diamond under shock compression to 0.1 to 1 TPa. Phys. Rev. B 81, 014111 (2010).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.014111
Knudson, M., Desjarlais, M. & Dolan, D. Shock-wave exploration of the high-pressure phases of carbon. Science 322, 1822–1825 (2008).
doi: 10.1126/science.1165278
Lee, K. et al. Laser-driven shock experiments on precompressed water: Implications for ‘icy’ giant planets. J. Chem Phys. 125, 014701 (2006).
doi: 10.1063/1.2207618
Chau, R., Mitchell, A., Minich, R. & Nellis, W. Electrical conductivity of water compressed dynamically to pressures of 70–180 GPa (0.7–1.8 Mbar). J. Chem. Phys. 114, 1361–1365 (2001).
doi: 10.1063/1.1332079
Ree, F. Molecular interaction of dense water at high temperature. J. Chem. Phys. 76, 6287 (1982).
doi: 10.1063/1.443032
French, M., Mattsson, T., Nettelmann, N. & Redmer, R. Equation of state and phase diagram of water at ultrahigh pressures as in planetary interiors. Phys. Rev. B 79, 054107 (2009).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.054107
French, M., Desjarlais, M. & Redmer, R. Ab initio calculation of thermodynamic potentials and entropies for superionic water. Phys. Rev. E 93, 022140 (2016).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.93.022140
Lyon, S & Johnson, J. SESAME database: Los Alamos Nat. Lab. LA-UR-92-3407 (1992).
Gleason, A. et al. Ultrafast visualization of crystallization and grain growth in shock-compressed SiO2. Nat. Commun. 6, 8191 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/ncomms9191
Dolan, D., Johnson, J. & Gupta, Y. Nanosecond freezing of water under multiple shock wave compression: Continuum modeling and wave profile measurements. J. Chem. Phys. 123, 064702 (2005).
doi: 10.1063/1.1993556
Celliers, P. et al. Line-imaging velocimeter for shock diagnostics at the Omega laser facility. Rev. Sci. Intrum. 75, 4916–4929 (2004).
doi: 10.1063/1.1807008
Benedict, L. et al. Multiphase equation of state for carbon addressing high pressures and temperatures. Phys. Rev. B 89, 224109 (2014).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.224109
Larsen, J. & Lane, S. Hyades: A plasma hydrodynamics code for dense plasma studies. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 51, 179–186 (1994).
doi: 10.1016/0022-4073(94)90078-7
Cascade Applied Sciences Inc. Hyades reference material: ‘Material Constitutive Models’ Chapter K.pdf (Cascade Applied Sciences Inc. (CAS), 2010).
Langford, J. & Wilson, A. Scherrer after sixty years: A survey and some new results in the determination of crystallite size. J. Appl. Cryst. 11, 102–113 (1978).
doi: 10.1107/S0021889878012844
Goncharov, A. et al. Dynamic ionization of water under extreme conditions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 125508 (2005).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.125508
Sugimura, E. et al. Experimental evidence of superionic conduction in H2O ice. J. Chem. Phys. 137, 194505 (2012).
doi: 10.1063/1.4766816
Cavazzoni, C. et al. Superionic and metallic states of water and ammonia at giant planet conditions. Science 283, 44–46 (1999).
doi: 10.1126/science.283.5398.44
Mott, N. & Gurney, R. Electronic Processes in Ionic Crystals 204 (Clarendon Press, 1940).
Karato, S. Theory of isotope diffusion in a material with multiple species and its implications for hydrogen-enhanced electrical conductivity in olivine. Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 219, 49–54 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.pepi.2013.03.001
Nellis, W., Holmes, N., Mitchell, A., Hamilton, D. & Nicol, M. Equation of state and electrical conductivity of ‘synthetic Uranus’, a mixture of water, ammonia, and isopropanol, at shock pressure up to 200 GPa (2 Mbar). J. Chem. Phys. 107, 9096 (1997).
doi: 10.1063/1.475200
Loubeyre, P., LeToullec, R., Wolanin, E., Hanfland, M. & Hausermann, D. Modulated phases and proton centering in ice observed by X-ray diffraction up to 170 GPa. Nature 397, 503–506 (1999).
doi: 10.1038/17300
Mattsson, T. & Desjarlais, M. High energy-density water: Density functional theory calculations of structure and electrical conductivity. Sandia National Laboratory Report. SAND2006-7539 (2007).