Responsibility, probability, and severity of harm: An experimental investigation of cognitive factors associated with checking-related OCD.
Appraisals
Cognitive-behavioural model
Compulsive checking
Obsessive-compulsive disorder
Responsibility
Threat estimation
Journal
Behaviour research and therapy
ISSN: 1873-622X
Titre abrégé: Behav Res Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372477
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2022
03 2022
Historique:
received:
24
02
2021
revised:
12
11
2021
accepted:
05
01
2022
pubmed:
16
1
2022
medline:
26
4
2022
entrez:
15
1
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The cognitive model of compulsive checking (Rachman, 2002) proposes that perceptions of responsibility, seriousness of harm and probability of harm interact to promote checking behaviour. We examined these factors in an ecologically valid experimental paradigm. Two groups of participants (participants with OCD who compulsively check and undergraduate controls) were assigned to a high or low responsibility condition, and then checked objects representing: (a) high seriousness of harm (stove burners), (b) low seriousness of harm (light bulbs), (c) high probability of harm (functional burners and bulbs), and (d) low probability of harm (non-functional burners and bulbs). In general, a diagnosis of OCD, as well as conditions of increased severity/likelihood of harm, and to a lesser degree, increased responsibility, led to a greater period of time spent checking. Implications for the cognitive-behavioural model of and treatment for compulsive checking are discussed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35032701
pii: S0005-7967(22)00005-5
doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2022.104034
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
104034Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
ID : MOP 64199
Pays : Canada
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.