Responsibility, probability, and severity of harm: An experimental investigation of cognitive factors associated with checking-related OCD.

Appraisals Cognitive-behavioural model Compulsive checking Obsessive-compulsive disorder Responsibility Threat estimation

Journal

Behaviour research and therapy
ISSN: 1873-622X
Titre abrégé: Behav Res Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372477

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2022
Historique:
received: 24 02 2021
revised: 12 11 2021
accepted: 05 01 2022
pubmed: 16 1 2022
medline: 26 4 2022
entrez: 15 1 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The cognitive model of compulsive checking (Rachman, 2002) proposes that perceptions of responsibility, seriousness of harm and probability of harm interact to promote checking behaviour. We examined these factors in an ecologically valid experimental paradigm. Two groups of participants (participants with OCD who compulsively check and undergraduate controls) were assigned to a high or low responsibility condition, and then checked objects representing: (a) high seriousness of harm (stove burners), (b) low seriousness of harm (light bulbs), (c) high probability of harm (functional burners and bulbs), and (d) low probability of harm (non-functional burners and bulbs). In general, a diagnosis of OCD, as well as conditions of increased severity/likelihood of harm, and to a lesser degree, increased responsibility, led to a greater period of time spent checking. Implications for the cognitive-behavioural model of and treatment for compulsive checking are discussed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35032701
pii: S0005-7967(22)00005-5
doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2022.104034
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

104034

Subventions

Organisme : CIHR
ID : MOP 64199
Pays : Canada

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Adam S Radomsky (AS)

Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Canada. Electronic address: adam.radomsky@concordia.ca.

Gillian M Alcolado (GM)

Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Canada.

Michel J Dugas (MJ)

Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Canada.

Stefanie L Lavoie (SL)

Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH