Safety and Efficacy of Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in Elderly Patients - A Narrative Review.
HoLEP
aged
benign prostatic hyperplasia
elderly patients
laser enucleation of the prostate
Journal
Clinical interventions in aging
ISSN: 1178-1998
Titre abrégé: Clin Interv Aging
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101273480
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
04
11
2021
accepted:
20
12
2021
entrez:
17
1
2022
pubmed:
18
1
2022
medline:
19
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common health condition in aging men resulting in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and low quality of life (QoL). We aimed to review studies on laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP) due to LUTS in elderly patients (>65 years) comparing different age groups, particularly considering functional outcomes, safety, and perioperative complications. A comprehensive search was conducted using the PubMed-MEDLINE, Web of Science, Wiley Online Library and Cochrane Library databases over the last 10 years until 7 October 2021 with the following search terms solely or in combination: "laser enucleation", "prostate", "laser prostatectomy", "aging", "elderly patients", "older patients" and "age". We identified 12 articles for inclusion in our analysis. Five studies focussed mainly on holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), one compared HoLEP to other laser prostatectomy procedures, two studies examined thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP), and two studies focused on GreenLight laser, one study focussed on potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) laser, and another study compared laser prostatectomy to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). These studies showed that LEP improved IPSS, Qmax and QoL compared to baseline regardless of age; no significant difference was reported among age groups. Although ASA scores and anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy rates are higher in elderly patients, studies revealed no significant difference in perioperative complication rates between age groups. Laser enucleation of the prostate is an effective and safe procedure in elderly patients, resulting in good functional outcomes, low morbidity, and few perioperative complications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35035216
doi: 10.2147/CIA.S347698
pii: 347698
pmc: PMC8754464
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
15-33Informations de copyright
© 2022 Yilmaz et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Prof. Dr. Christian Gratzke is advisor for Astellas Pharma GmbH, DE, Ipsen Pharma GmbH, DE, Steba Biotech S.A., LUX, Bayer Pharma, DE, Olympus Winter & Ibe GmbH, DE, Medi-Tate Ltd., IL, MSD, DE, Astra-Zeneca, UK and Roche, CH. He receives speaker fees from Amgen, USA, Astellas Pharma GmbH, DE, Ipsen Pharma GmbH, DE, Janssen-Cilag GmbH, BEL, Bayer Pharma, DE, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, JPN and medac GmbH, DE. A. Miernik receives research funding from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Berlin (D). He receives support for his travel activities from the European Society of Urology, Arnhem (NL), and German Society of Urology, Düsseldorf (D). A. Miernik is also a consultant for: KLS Martin, Tuttlingen (D), Avateramedical, Jena (D), LISA LaserProducts GmbH, Katlenburg-Lindau (D), Schoelly fiber optics GmbH, Denzlingen (D), Dornier MedTech Laser GmbH (D), Medi-Tate Ltd. (IL, USA) and B. Braun New Ventures GmbH, Freiburg (D). A. Miernik is speaker for the companies Richard Wolf GmbH (D) and Boston Scientific (USA). He also served as a reviewer for the Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft, Wien (A). In addition, Prof. Dr. Arkadiusz Miernik has a patent WO2014173468A1 licensed to Purenum GmbH, German start-up, a patent EP2988681A1 licensed to Purenum GmbH, German start-up, a patent WO2015082372A1 pending; a patent WO2017207361A1 pending; a patent DE102019220537A1 pending; a patent DE102019134352A1 pending; a patent DE102015003560B3 issued; a patent WO2021005060A1 pending. M. Yilmaz, J. Esser and Rodrigo Suarez have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100
pubmed: 19621070
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 11;7(1):7984
pubmed: 28801563
World J Urol. 2010 Feb;28(1):53-62
pubmed: 20052586
Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1099-1109
pubmed: 25613154
J Urol. 2008 Jul;180(1):246-9
pubmed: 18499179
Eur Urol. 2013 Jul;64(1):118-40
pubmed: 23541338
Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2021 Apr;13(2):279-285
pubmed: 33260275
J Urol. 2011 Nov;186(5):1977-81
pubmed: 21944135
BJU Int. 2008 Mar;101 Suppl 3:22-6
pubmed: 18307682
Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Jun;34(4):815-826
pubmed: 30604345
World J Urol. 2021 Dec;39(12):4405-4412
pubmed: 34232353
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2020 Jun;38(6):380-384
pubmed: 32456546
Urol Ann. 2015 Jan-Mar;7(1):36-40
pubmed: 25657541
World J Urol. 2015 Apr;33(4):487-93
pubmed: 25416347
BJU Int. 2007 Jul;100(1):94-101
pubmed: 17419697
Urology. 2005 Nov;66(5 Suppl):108-13
pubmed: 16194716
Urology. 2013 Mar;81(3):634-9
pubmed: 23332997
Curr Urol Rep. 2018 Jul 12;19(9):71
pubmed: 29998354
Aging Male. 2012 Mar;15(1):63-7
pubmed: 22129103
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Feb;10(2):775-784
pubmed: 33718079
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 4;9(1):8261
pubmed: 31164686
World J Urol. 2021 Jan;39(1):143-148
pubmed: 32219512
J Urol. 2013 Jan;189(1 Suppl):S141-5
pubmed: 23234620
Eur Urol. 2008 Jan;53(1):160-6
pubmed: 17869409
J Endourol. 2021 May;35(5):639-646
pubmed: 33040607
Int Neurourol J. 2016 Jun;20(2):143-50
pubmed: 27377947
Urology. 2019 Oct;132:170-176
pubmed: 31252003
Int Braz J Urol. 2016 Mar-Apr;42(2):293-301
pubmed: 27256184
Eur Urol. 2008 Mar;53(3):599-604
pubmed: 17997021
J Clin Med. 2020 May 10;9(5):
pubmed: 32397634
BJU Int. 2013 Nov;112(7):982-9
pubmed: 23510326
Curr Urol Rep. 2016 Jun;17(6):45
pubmed: 27053186