Hyaluronic acid plasma levels during high
ARDS
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
Glycocalyx
High tidal volume ventilation
Hyaluronic acid
Lung protective ventilation
Pig
Sepsis
Journal
PeerJ
ISSN: 2167-8359
Titre abrégé: PeerJ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101603425
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
07
06
2021
accepted:
28
11
2021
entrez:
17
1
2022
pubmed:
18
1
2022
medline:
18
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Shedding of the endothelial glycocalyx can be observed regularly during sepsis. Moreover, sepsis may be associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which requires lung protective ventilation with the two cornerstones of application of low tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure. This study investigated the effect of a lung protective ventilation on the integrity of the endothelial glycocalyx in comparison to a high tidal volume ventilation mode in a porcine model of sepsis-induced ARDS. After approval by the State and Institutional Animal Care Committee, 20 male pigs were anesthetized and received a continuous infusion of lipopolysaccharide to induce septic shock. The animals were randomly assigned to either low tidal volume ventilation, high tidal volume ventilation, or no-LPS-group groups and observed for 6 h. In addition to the gas exchange parameters and hematologic analyses, the serum hyaluronic acid concentrations were determined from central venous blood and from pre- and postpulmonary and pre- and postcerebral circulation. Post-mortem analysis included histopathological evaluation and determination of the pulmonary and cerebral wet-to-dry ratios. Both sepsis groups developed ARDS within 6 h of the experiment and showed significantly increased serum levels of hyaluronic acid in comparison to the no-LPS-group. No significant differences in the hyaluronic acid concentrations were detected before and after pulmonary and cerebral circulation. There was also no significant difference in the serum hyaluronic acid concentrations between the two sepsis groups. Post-mortem analysis showed no significant difference between the two sepsis groups. In a porcine model of septic shock and ARDS, the serum hyaluronic acid levels were significantly elevated in both sepsis groups in comparison to the no-LPS-group. Intergroup comparison between lung protective ventilated and high tidal ventilated animals revealed no significant differences in the serum hyaluronic acid levels.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Shedding of the endothelial glycocalyx can be observed regularly during sepsis. Moreover, sepsis may be associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which requires lung protective ventilation with the two cornerstones of application of low tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure. This study investigated the effect of a lung protective ventilation on the integrity of the endothelial glycocalyx in comparison to a high tidal volume ventilation mode in a porcine model of sepsis-induced ARDS.
METHODS
METHODS
After approval by the State and Institutional Animal Care Committee, 20 male pigs were anesthetized and received a continuous infusion of lipopolysaccharide to induce septic shock. The animals were randomly assigned to either low tidal volume ventilation, high tidal volume ventilation, or no-LPS-group groups and observed for 6 h. In addition to the gas exchange parameters and hematologic analyses, the serum hyaluronic acid concentrations were determined from central venous blood and from pre- and postpulmonary and pre- and postcerebral circulation. Post-mortem analysis included histopathological evaluation and determination of the pulmonary and cerebral wet-to-dry ratios.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Both sepsis groups developed ARDS within 6 h of the experiment and showed significantly increased serum levels of hyaluronic acid in comparison to the no-LPS-group. No significant differences in the hyaluronic acid concentrations were detected before and after pulmonary and cerebral circulation. There was also no significant difference in the serum hyaluronic acid concentrations between the two sepsis groups. Post-mortem analysis showed no significant difference between the two sepsis groups.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
In a porcine model of septic shock and ARDS, the serum hyaluronic acid levels were significantly elevated in both sepsis groups in comparison to the no-LPS-group. Intergroup comparison between lung protective ventilated and high tidal ventilated animals revealed no significant differences in the serum hyaluronic acid levels.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35036142
doi: 10.7717/peerj.12649
pii: 12649
pmc: PMC8742546
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e12649Informations de copyright
© 2022 Thomas et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Erik K. Hartmann is an Academic Editor for PeerJ.
Références
PeerJ. 2020 Dec 9;8:e10471
pubmed: 33354426
Anesthesiology. 2004 May;100(5):1211-23
pubmed: 15114220
Basic Res Cardiol. 2013 May;108(3):347
pubmed: 23563917
Front Pharmacol. 2020 May 08;11:597
pubmed: 32457611
Anesthesiology. 2009 Nov;111(5):1065-74
pubmed: 19809280
Anesth Analg. 2010 Jan 1;110(1):174-80
pubmed: 19897802
Respir Res. 2014 Sep 06;15:101
pubmed: 25189285
Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):486-552
pubmed: 28098591
Front Cell Neurosci. 2021 Oct 07;15:739699
pubmed: 34690703
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:3758278
pubmed: 27699168
Intensive Care Med. 2007 Feb;33(2):308-14
pubmed: 17091244
Int Immunopharmacol. 2018 Dec;65:96-107
pubmed: 30308440
Anesth Analg. 2004 Mar;98(3):775-81, table of contents
pubmed: 14980936
Respir Res. 2018 Feb 13;19(1):29
pubmed: 29433570
Crit Care Med. 2011 Apr;39(4):746-55
pubmed: 21263322
PeerJ. 2020 Mar 2;8:e8725
pubmed: 32175194
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2018 Jul;38(7):1427-1439
pubmed: 29880486
Anesthesiology. 2006 Oct;105(4):689-95
pubmed: 17006066
Inflammation. 2018 Aug;41(4):1515-1523
pubmed: 29728805
Biomed Pharmacother. 2021 Jan;133:111026
pubmed: 33378942
Anesthesiology. 2006 Nov;105(5):911-9
pubmed: 17065884
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2018 Nov;38(11):1979-1992
pubmed: 28825336
Physiol Rep. 2021 May;9(9):e14871
pubmed: 33991456
JAMA. 1999 Jul 7;282(1):54-61
pubmed: 10404912
Vascul Pharmacol. 2018 Jan;100:26-33
pubmed: 28919014
Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Oct 6;7(1):102
pubmed: 28986821
Am J Pathol. 2020 Apr;190(4):768-780
pubmed: 32035885
Crit Care. 2019 Jan 17;23(1):16
pubmed: 30654825
JAMA. 2012 Jun 20;307(23):2526-33
pubmed: 22797452
Physiol Rep. 2016 Sep;4(18):
pubmed: 27670411
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2013 Oct;108(7):578-83
pubmed: 22907521
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 9;13(8):e0202131
pubmed: 30092082
Crit Care. 2005;9(6):607-21
pubmed: 16356246
Curr Top Membr. 2018;82:33-52
pubmed: 30360782
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2021 Apr 1;34(2):107-112
pubmed: 33470664
J Intern Med. 2006 Apr;259(4):339-50
pubmed: 16594902