A Web- and Mobile-Based Intervention for Women Treated for Breast Cancer to Manage Chronic Pain and Symptoms Related to Lymphedema: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
breast cancer
health behavior
lymphatic exercises
lymphedema
mHealth
pain
symptoms
Journal
JMIR cancer
ISSN: 2369-1999
Titre abrégé: JMIR Cancer
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101666844
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Jan 2022
17 Jan 2022
Historique:
received:
08
04
2021
accepted:
01
12
2021
revised:
23
08
2021
entrez:
17
1
2022
pubmed:
18
1
2022
medline:
18
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The-Optimal-Lymph-Flow (TOLF) is a patient-centered, web- and mobile-based mHealth system that delivers safe, easy, and feasible digital therapy of lymphatic exercises and limb mobility exercises. The purpose of this randomized clinical trial (RCT) was to evaluate the effectiveness of the web- and mobile-based TOLF system for managing chronic pain and symptoms related to lymphedema. The primary outcome includes pain reduction, and the secondary outcomes focus on symptom relief, limb volume difference measured by infrared perometer, BMI, and quality of life (QOL) related to pain. We hypothesized that participants in the intervention group would have improved pain and symptom experiences, limb volume difference, BMI, and QOL. A parallel RCT with a control-experimental, pre- and posttest, and repeated-measures design were used. A total of 120 patients were recruited face-to-face at the point of care during clinical visits. Patients were randomized according to pain in a 1:1 ratio into either the arm precaution (AP) control group to improve limb mobility and arm protection or The-Optimal-Lymph flow (TOLF) intervention group to promote lymph flow and limb mobility. Trial outcomes were evaluated at baseline and at week 12 after the intervention. Descriptive statistics, Fisher exact tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, t test, and generalized linear mixed effects models were performed for data analysis. At the study endpoint of 12 weeks, significantly fewer patients in the TOLF intervention group compared with the AP control group reported chronic pain (45% [27/60] vs 70% [42/60]; odds ratio [OR] 0.39, 95% CI 0.17-0.90; P=.02). Patients who received the TOLF intervention were significantly more likely to achieve a complete reduction in pain (50% [23/46] vs 22% [11/51]; OR 3.56, 95% CI 1.39-9.76; P=.005) and soreness (43% [21/49] vs 22% [11/51]; OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.03-6.81; P=.03). Significantly lower median severity scores were found in the TOLF group for chronic pain (MedTOLF=0, IQR 0-1 vs MedAP=1, IQR 0-2; P=.02) and general bodily pain (MedTOLF=1, IQR=0-1.5 vs MedAP=1, IQR 1-3; P=.04). Compared with the AP control group, significantly fewer patients in the TOLF group reported arm/hand swelling (P=.04), heaviness (P=.03), redness (P=.03), and limited movement in shoulder (P=.02) and arm (P=.03). No significant differences between the TOLF and AP groups were found in complete reduction of aching (P=.12) and tenderness (P=.65), mean numbers of lymphedema symptom reported (P=.11), ≥5% limb volume differences (P=.48), and BMI (P=.12). The TOLF intervention had significant benefits for breast cancer survivors to manage chronic pain, soreness, general bodily pain, arm/hand swelling, heaviness, and impaired limb mobility. The intervention resulted in a 13% reduction (from 40% [24/60] to 27% [16/60]) in proportions of patients who took pain medications compared with the AP control group, which had a 5% increase (from 40% [24/60] to 45% [27/60]). A 12% reduction (from 27% [16/60] to 15% [9/60]) in proportions of patients with ≥5% limb volume differences was found in the TOLF intervention, while a 5% increase in the AP control group (from 40% [24/60] to 45% [27/60]) was found. In conclusion, the TOLF intervention can be a better choice for breast cancer survivors to reduce chronic pain and limb volume. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02462226; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02462226. RR2-10.2196/resprot.5104.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The-Optimal-Lymph-Flow (TOLF) is a patient-centered, web- and mobile-based mHealth system that delivers safe, easy, and feasible digital therapy of lymphatic exercises and limb mobility exercises.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this randomized clinical trial (RCT) was to evaluate the effectiveness of the web- and mobile-based TOLF system for managing chronic pain and symptoms related to lymphedema. The primary outcome includes pain reduction, and the secondary outcomes focus on symptom relief, limb volume difference measured by infrared perometer, BMI, and quality of life (QOL) related to pain. We hypothesized that participants in the intervention group would have improved pain and symptom experiences, limb volume difference, BMI, and QOL.
METHODS
METHODS
A parallel RCT with a control-experimental, pre- and posttest, and repeated-measures design were used. A total of 120 patients were recruited face-to-face at the point of care during clinical visits. Patients were randomized according to pain in a 1:1 ratio into either the arm precaution (AP) control group to improve limb mobility and arm protection or The-Optimal-Lymph flow (TOLF) intervention group to promote lymph flow and limb mobility. Trial outcomes were evaluated at baseline and at week 12 after the intervention. Descriptive statistics, Fisher exact tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, t test, and generalized linear mixed effects models were performed for data analysis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
At the study endpoint of 12 weeks, significantly fewer patients in the TOLF intervention group compared with the AP control group reported chronic pain (45% [27/60] vs 70% [42/60]; odds ratio [OR] 0.39, 95% CI 0.17-0.90; P=.02). Patients who received the TOLF intervention were significantly more likely to achieve a complete reduction in pain (50% [23/46] vs 22% [11/51]; OR 3.56, 95% CI 1.39-9.76; P=.005) and soreness (43% [21/49] vs 22% [11/51]; OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.03-6.81; P=.03). Significantly lower median severity scores were found in the TOLF group for chronic pain (MedTOLF=0, IQR 0-1 vs MedAP=1, IQR 0-2; P=.02) and general bodily pain (MedTOLF=1, IQR=0-1.5 vs MedAP=1, IQR 1-3; P=.04). Compared with the AP control group, significantly fewer patients in the TOLF group reported arm/hand swelling (P=.04), heaviness (P=.03), redness (P=.03), and limited movement in shoulder (P=.02) and arm (P=.03). No significant differences between the TOLF and AP groups were found in complete reduction of aching (P=.12) and tenderness (P=.65), mean numbers of lymphedema symptom reported (P=.11), ≥5% limb volume differences (P=.48), and BMI (P=.12).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The TOLF intervention had significant benefits for breast cancer survivors to manage chronic pain, soreness, general bodily pain, arm/hand swelling, heaviness, and impaired limb mobility. The intervention resulted in a 13% reduction (from 40% [24/60] to 27% [16/60]) in proportions of patients who took pain medications compared with the AP control group, which had a 5% increase (from 40% [24/60] to 45% [27/60]). A 12% reduction (from 27% [16/60] to 15% [9/60]) in proportions of patients with ≥5% limb volume differences was found in the TOLF intervention, while a 5% increase in the AP control group (from 40% [24/60] to 45% [27/60]) was found. In conclusion, the TOLF intervention can be a better choice for breast cancer survivors to reduce chronic pain and limb volume.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02462226; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02462226.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)
UNASSIGNED
RR2-10.2196/resprot.5104.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35037883
pii: v8i1e29485
doi: 10.2196/29485
pmc: PMC8893593
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02462226']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e29485Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM007753
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
©Mei Rosemary Fu, Deborah Axelrod, Amber A Guth, Joan Scagliola, Kavita Rampertaap, Nardin El-Shammaa, Jeanna M Qiu, Melissa L McTernan, Laura Frye, Christopher S Park, Gary Yu, Charles Tilley, Yao Wang. Originally published in JMIR Cancer (https://cancer.jmir.org), 17.01.2022.
Références
Lymphat Res Biol. 2019 Jun;17(3):368-373
pubmed: 30543479
Perspect Clin Res. 2011 Jul;2(3):109-12
pubmed: 21897887
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Oct;21(11):3481-9
pubmed: 24809302
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Jul;16(7):1959-72
pubmed: 19365624
Psychooncology. 2013 Jul;22(7):1466-84
pubmed: 23044512
Qual Life Res. 2020 Jul;29(7):1789-1800
pubmed: 32152817
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2005;23(2-3):137-57
pubmed: 16492656
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Oct;213(4):543-51
pubmed: 21802319
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Mar;216(3):380-9; quiz 511-3
pubmed: 23266421
Lymphology. 2002 Jun;35(2):59-71
pubmed: 12081053
Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2021 Mar;13(1):1-18
pubmed: 34322193
World J Clin Oncol. 2014 Aug 10;5(3):241-7
pubmed: 25114841
Integr Cancer Ther. 2021 Jan-Dec;20:15347354211026757
pubmed: 34160294
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Jan 21;5(1):e7
pubmed: 26795447
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2015 Oct 15;7:345-52
pubmed: 26527899
J Pers Med. 2015 Sep 03;5(3):326-40
pubmed: 26404383
Cancer Nurs. 2021 Nov-Dec 01;44(6):E493-E502
pubmed: 34694088
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Mar;29(5-6):758-769
pubmed: 31769562
Lymphat Res Biol. 2009;7(1):29-45
pubmed: 19302022
Breast. 2016 Oct;29:231-40
pubmed: 27460425
Nurs Res. 2008 Nov-Dec;57(6):416-25
pubmed: 19018216
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Oct;144(4):855-60
pubmed: 1928962
Pain. 2001 May;92(1-2):195-200
pubmed: 11323140
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Nov 10;26(32):5213-9
pubmed: 18838709
Internet Interv. 2016 Sep;5:56-64
pubmed: 28255542
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Apr;16(4):775-82
pubmed: 17416770
Lymphat Res Biol. 2016 Sep;14(3):142-7
pubmed: 27266576
Lymphat Res Biol. 2021 Jun;19(3):261-268
pubmed: 33185515
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 8;12(11):e0187165
pubmed: 29117210
Lymphology. 2009 Dec;42(4):161-75
pubmed: 20218084
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005 Apr 28;3:30
pubmed: 15860132
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 31;13(4):e126
pubmed: 22209829
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Dec;38(6):849-59
pubmed: 19819668
Pain Manag. 2016 Nov;6(6):603-618
pubmed: 27481184
J Clin Oncol. 2005 May 20;23(15):3322-30
pubmed: 15908646
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jul;17(7):1847-53
pubmed: 20140528
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2020 Sep 1;47(5):518-538
pubmed: 32830794