Invasion front dynamics of interactive populations in environments with barriers.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 01 2022
17 01 2022
Historique:
received:
21
07
2021
accepted:
03
01
2022
entrez:
18
1
2022
pubmed:
19
1
2022
medline:
5
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Invading populations normally comprise different subpopulations that interact while trying to overcome existing barriers against their way to occupy new areas. However, the majority of studies so far only consider single or multiple population invasion into areas where there is no resistance against the invasion. Here, we developed a model to study how cooperative/competitive populations invade in the presence of a physical barrier that should be degraded during the invasion. For one dimensional (1D) environment, we found that a Langevin equation as [Formula: see text] describing invasion front position. We then obtained how [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] depend on population interactions and environmental barrier intensity. In two dimensional (2D) environment, for the average interface position movements we found a Langevin equation as [Formula: see text]. Similar to the 1D case, we calculate how [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] respond to population interaction and environmental barrier intensity. Finally, the study of invasion front morphology through dynamic scaling analysis showed that growth exponent, [Formula: see text], depends on both population interaction and environmental barrier intensity. Saturated interface width, [Formula: see text], versus width of the 2D environment (L) also exhibits scaling behavior. Our findings show revealed that competition among subpopulations leads to more rough invasion fronts. Considering the wide range of shreds of evidence for clonal diversity in cancer cell populations, our findings suggest that interactions between such diverse populations can potentially participate in the irregularities of tumor border.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35039586
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-04806-x
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-04806-x
pmc: PMC8764055
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
826Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Williamson, M. & Griffiths, B. Biological invasions (Springer, New York, 1996).
Ricciardi, A. et al. Invasion science: a horizon scan of emerging challenges and opportunities. Trends Ecol. Evolut. 32, 464–474 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2017.03.007
Van Saarloos, W. Front propagation into unstable states. Phys. Rep. 386, 29–222 (2003).
doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2003.08.001
OMalley, L., Korniss, G. & Caraco, T. Ecological invasion, roughened fronts, and a competitors extreme advance: integrating stochastic spatial-growth models. Bull. Math. Biol. 71, 1160–1188 (2009).
doi: 10.1007/s11538-009-9398-6
Lewis, M. A., Petrovskii, S. V. & Potts, J. R. The mathematics behind biological invasions Vol. 44 (Springer, New York, 2016).
Fisher, R. A. The wave of advance of advantageous genes. Ann. Eugenics 7, 355–369 (1937).
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1937.tb02153.x
Lavergne, S. & Molofsky, J. Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104, 3883–3888 (2007).
pubmed: 17360447
pmcid: 1805698
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607324104
Korolev, K. S., Xavier, J. B. & Gore, J. Turning ecology and evolution against cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 14, 371–380 (2014).
pubmed: 24739582
doi: 10.1038/nrc3712
Wolf, K. et al. Physical limits of cell migration: control by ecm space and nuclear deformation and tuning by proteolysis and traction force. J. Cell Biol. 201, 1069–1084 (2013).
pubmed: 23798731
pmcid: 3691458
doi: 10.1083/jcb.201210152
Lu, P., Takai, K., Weaver, V. M. & Werb, Z. Extracellular matrix degradation and remodeling in development and disease. Cold Spring Harbor Persp. Biol. 3, a005058 (2011).
Wirtz, D., Konstantopoulos, K. & Searson, P. C. The physics of cancer: the role of physical interactions and mechanical forces in metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11, 512–522 (2011).
pubmed: 21701513
pmcid: 3262453
doi: 10.1038/nrc3080
Spill, F., Reynolds, D. S., Kamm, R. D. & Zaman, M. H. Impact of the physical microenvironment on tumor progression and metastasis. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 40, 41–48 (2016).
pubmed: 26938687
pmcid: 4975620
doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2016.02.007
Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100, 57–70 (2000).
pubmed: 10647931
doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81683-9
Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144, 646–674 (2011).
pubmed: 21376230
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013
Azimzade, Y. & Saberi, A. A. Short-range migration can alter evolutionary dynamics in solid tumors. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2019, 103502 (2019).
doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/ab4983
West, J., Schenck, R., Gatenbee, C., Robertson-Tessi, M. & Anderson, A. R. Tissue structure accelerates evolution: premalignant sweeps precede neutral expansion. bioRxiv 542019 (2019).
Maley, C. C. et al. Classifying the evolutionary and ecological features of neoplasms. Nat. Rev. Cancer 17, 605–619 (2017).
pubmed: 28912577
pmcid: 5811185
doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.69
Cleary, A. S., Leonard, T. L., Gestl, S. A. & Gunther, E. J. Tumour cell heterogeneity maintained by cooperating subclones in wnt-driven mammary cancers. Nature 508, 113–117 (2014).
pubmed: 24695311
pmcid: 4050741
doi: 10.1038/nature13187
Shahriari, K. et al. Cooperation among heterogeneous prostate cancer cells in the bone metastatic niche. Oncogene (2016).
Calbo, J. et al. A functional role for tumor cell heterogeneity in a mouse model of small cell lung cancer. Cancer Cell 19, 244–256 (2011).
pubmed: 21316603
doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.12.021
Martín-Pardillos, A. et al. The role of clonal communication and heterogeneity in breast cancer. BMC Cancer 19, 1–26 (2019).
doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5883-y
Kim, T.-M. et al. Subclonal genomic architectures of primary and metastatic colorectal cancer based on intratumoral genetic heterogeneity. Clin. Cancer Res. 21, 4461–4472 (2015).
pubmed: 25979483
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2413
Yachida, S. et al. Distant metastasis occurs late during the genetic evolution of pancreatic cancer. Nature 467, 1114 (2010).
pubmed: 20981102
pmcid: 3148940
doi: 10.1038/nature09515
Campbell, P. J. et al. The patterns and dynamics of genomic instability in metastatic pancreatic cancer. Nature 467, 1109 (2010).
pubmed: 20981101
pmcid: 3137369
doi: 10.1038/nature09460
Capp, J.-P. et al. Group phenotypic composition in cancer. Elife 10, e63518 (2021).
pubmed: 33784238
pmcid: 8009660
doi: 10.7554/eLife.63518
Murray, J. D. Mathematical biology I: an introduction (2003).
Mikhailov, A., Schimansky-Geier, L. & Ebeling, W. Stochastic motion of the propagating front in bistable media. Phys. Lett. A 96, 453–456 (1983).
doi: 10.1016/0375-9601(83)90163-9
Hatzikirou, H., Brusch, L., Schaller, C., Simon, M. & Deutsch, A. Prediction of traveling front behavior in a lattice-gas cellular automaton model for tumor invasion. Comput. Math. Appl. 59, 2326–2339 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.08.041
Azimzade, Y., Sasar, M. & Maleki, I. Invasion front dynamics in disordered environments. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–10 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75366-1
Azimzade, Y., Saberi, A. A. & Sahimi, M. Effect of heterogeneity and spatial correlations on the structure of a tumor invasion front in cellular environments. Phys. Rev. E 100, 062409 (2019).
pubmed: 31962455
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.100.062409
Rapin, G. et al. Roughness and dynamics of proliferating cell fronts as a probe of cell-cell interactions. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–9 (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86684-3
Pérez-Beteta, J. et al. Tumor surface regularity at mr imaging predicts survival and response to surgery in patients with glioblastoma. Radiology 171051 (2018).
Pérez-Beteta, J. et al. Morphological mri-based features provide pretreatment survival prediction in glioblastoma. Eur. Radiol. 1–10 (2018).
Brú, A. et al. Super-rough dynamics on tumor growth. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4008 (1998).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4008
Brú, A., Albertos, S., Subiza, J. L., García-Asenjo, J. L. & Brú, I. The universal dynamics of tumor growth. Biophys. J. 85, 2948–2961 (2003).
pubmed: 14581197
pmcid: 1303573
doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74715-8
Huergo, M., Pasquale, M., González, P., Bolzán, A. & Arvia, A. Growth dynamics of cancer cell colonies and their comparison with noncancerous cells. Phys. Rev. E 85, 011918 (2012).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.011918
Munn, L. L. Dynamics of tissue topology during cancer invasion and metastasis. Phys. Biol. 10, 065003 (2013).
pubmed: 24304856
pmcid: 4324506
doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/6/065003
Dey, B., Sekhar, G. R. & Mukhopadhyay, S. K. In vivo mimicking model for solid tumor towards hydromechanics of tissue deformation and creation of necrosis. J. Biol. Phys. 1–40 (2018).
Block, M., Schöll, E. & Drasdo, D. Classifying the expansion kinetics and critical surface dynamics of growing cell populations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 248101 (2007).
pubmed: 18233492
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.248101
Moglia, B., Guisoni, N. & Albano, E. V. Interfacial properties in a discrete model for tumor growth. Phys. Rev. E 87, 032713 (2013).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.87.032713
Moglia, B., Albano, E. V. & Guisoni, N. Pinning-depinning transition in a stochastic growth model for the evolution of cell colony fronts in a disordered medium. Phys. Rev. E 94, 052139 (2016).
pubmed: 27967013
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.94.052139
Scianna, M. & Preziosi, L. A hybrid model describing different morphologies of tumor invasion fronts. Math. Model. Nat. Phenom. 7, 78–104 (2012).
doi: 10.1051/mmnp/20127105
Azimzade, Y., Saberi, A. A. & Sahimi, M. Role of the interplay between the internal and external conditions in invasive behavior of tumors. Sci. Rep. 8, 5968 (2018).
pubmed: 29654275
pmcid: 5899171
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24418-8
Ben-Jacob, E. et al. Generic modelling of cooperative growth patterns in bacterial colonies. Nature 368, 46 (1994).
pubmed: 8107881
doi: 10.1038/368046a0
Family, F. & Vicsek, T. Dynamics of fractal surfaces (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991).
doi: 10.1142/1452
Vicsek, T. Fractal growth phenomena (World scientific, Singapore, 1992).
doi: 10.1142/1407
Swanson, K. R., Bridge, C., Murray, J. & Alvord, E. C. Jr. Virtual and real brain tumors: using mathematical modeling to quantify glioma growth and invasion. J. Neurol. Sci. 216, 1–10 (2003).
pubmed: 14607296
doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2003.06.001
Metzcar, J., Wang, Y., Heiland, R. & Macklin, P. A review of cell-based computational modeling in cancer biology. JCO Clin. Cancer Inform. 2, 1–13 (2019).
doi: 10.1200/CCI.18.00069
Azimzade, Y., Saberi, A. A. & Gatenby, R. A. Superlinear growth reveals the allee effect in tumors. Phys. Rev. E 103, 042405 (2021).
pubmed: 34005934
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.103.042405
Anderson, A. R., Weaver, A. M., Cummings, P. T. & Quaranta, V. Tumor morphology and phenotypic evolution driven by selective pressure from the microenvironment. Cell 127, 905–915 (2006).
pubmed: 17129778
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.042