Aluminum can activate grapevine defense through actin remodeling.
Actin
Aluminum
Defense signaling
Grapevine
ROS
Vitis vinifera
Journal
Horticulture research
ISSN: 2662-6810
Titre abrégé: Hortic Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101655540
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Jan 2022
18 Jan 2022
Historique:
entrez:
18
1
2022
pubmed:
19
1
2022
medline:
19
1
2022
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
In the current study, we used a grapevine cell line in which actin filaments are labeled by GFP to show that aluminum causes actin remodeling through activation of NADPH oxidase in the plasma membrane, followed by activation of phytoalexin synthesis genes. Elimination of actin filaments by latrunculin B disrupts gene activation and inhibition of MAPK signaling by the inhibitor PD98059. Interestingly, aluminum also induces the transcription of ISOCHORISMATE SYNTHASE, a key enzyme for the synthesis of salicylic acid, as well as PR1, a gene that is known to be responsive to salicylic acid. However, while salicylic acid responses are usually a hallmark of the hypersensitive response, aluminum-triggered defense is not accompanied by cell death. Both actin remodeling and gene activation in response to aluminum can be suppressed by the natural auxin indole acetic acid, suggesting that the actin response is not caused by nonspecific signaling. Further evidence for the specificity of the aluminum-triggered activation of phytoalexin synthesis genes comes from experiments in which plant peptide elicitors induce significant cellular mortality but do not evoke induction of these transcription. The response in grapevine cells can be recapitulated in grapevine leaf discs from two genotypes contrasting in stilbene inducibility. Here, aluminum can induce accumulation of the central grapevine phytoalexin, the stilbene aglycone trans-resveratrol; this is preceded by a rapid induction of transcription for RESVERATROL SYNTHASE and the regulating transcription factor MYB14. The amplitude of this induction reflects the general stilbene inducibility of these genotypes, indicating that the aluminum effect is not caused by nonspecific toxicity but by activation of specific signaling pathways. The findings are discussed in relation to a model in which actin filaments activate a specific branch of defense signaling, acting in concert with calcium-dependent PAMP-triggered immunity. This pathway links the apoplastic oxidative burst through MAPK signaling with the activation of defense-related transcription.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35039862
pii: 6510205
doi: 10.1093/hr/uhab016
pmc: PMC8771448
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
Références
Protoplasma. 2017 Jan;254(1):271-283
pubmed: 26769707
J Exp Bot. 2004 Jan;55(395):189-98
pubmed: 14673033
Plant Cell Physiol. 2017 Jan 1;58(1):71-85
pubmed: 28173585
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jun 27;103(26):10098-103
pubmed: 16785434
J Exp Bot. 2018 May 25;69(12):2883-2896
pubmed: 29659985
J Exp Bot. 2015 Jun;66(11):3243-57
pubmed: 25873669
J Exp Bot. 2009;60(2):603-14
pubmed: 19129161
J Exp Bot. 2013 Apr;64(7):1805-16
pubmed: 23408828
Cell Death Differ. 2011 Aug;18(8):1263-70
pubmed: 21566662
Plant Physiol. 1995 Feb;107(2):315-321
pubmed: 12228360
Plant Signal Behav. 2009 Jun;4(6):493-6
pubmed: 19816125
Nature. 2004 Feb 26;427(6977):858-61
pubmed: 14985766
Plant J. 2002 Sep;31(5):629-38
pubmed: 12207652
J Exp Bot. 2016 Oct;67(19):5841-5856
pubmed: 27702992
Plant Sci. 2014 Jun;223:36-44
pubmed: 24767113
J Exp Bot. 2010 Sep;61(14):4021-31
pubmed: 20675535
Plant Cell Physiol. 2002 Feb;43(2):207-16
pubmed: 11867700
Plant Cell Environ. 2008 Feb;31(2):218-26
pubmed: 17996015
EMBO J. 2002 Jul 1;21(13):3296-306
pubmed: 12093731
EMBO J. 2011 Mar 16;30(6):1173-83
pubmed: 21326210
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2005;43:205-27
pubmed: 16078883
J Exp Bot. 2016 Mar;67(6):1795-804
pubmed: 26842984
Plant Cell. 2013 Oct;25(10):4135-49
pubmed: 24151295
Redox Biol. 2017 Apr;11:192-204
pubmed: 27984790
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2010 Aug;13(4):459-65
pubmed: 20471306
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2017 Aug;38:124-132
pubmed: 28538164
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26405
pubmed: 22053190
Arch Biochem Biophys. 1968 Apr;125(1):189-98
pubmed: 5655425
FEBS Lett. 1987 Mar 23;213(2):316-8
pubmed: 3556584
Trends Plant Sci. 2018 Sep;23(9):833-844
pubmed: 29970339
Protoplasma. 2002 Feb;219(1-2):72-81
pubmed: 11926069
Plant Sci. 2021 Jan;302:110712
pubmed: 33288019
Trends Plant Sci. 2002 Jun;7(6):251-6
pubmed: 12049921
Biochem J. 2008 Aug 1;413(3):389-404
pubmed: 18613816
J Agric Food Chem. 2002 May 8;50(10):2731-41
pubmed: 11982391
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2015;66:415-40
pubmed: 25423079
Plant Physiol. 2004 Dec;136(4):3884-91
pubmed: 15591446
Planta. 1991 Sep;185(2):215-9
pubmed: 24186344
Protoplasma. 2017 Sep;254(5):1887-1901
pubmed: 28550468
Plant Physiol. 2012 Nov;160(3):1407-19
pubmed: 22961129
Mol Plant. 2015 Apr;8(4):521-39
pubmed: 25744358
Mol Plant Pathol. 2018 Feb;19(2):418-431
pubmed: 28056495
Planta. 2007 Jan;225(2):451-68
pubmed: 16909289
Science. 1993 Dec 17;262(5141):1883-6
pubmed: 8266079
Plant J. 2006 Nov;48(4):485-98
pubmed: 17059410
Plant Signal Behav. 2009 Jul;4(7):592-7
pubmed: 19820334
Nature. 2006 Nov 16;444(7117):323-9
pubmed: 17108957
Trends Cell Biol. 1997 Sep;7(9):353-61
pubmed: 17708980
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005 Jul;6(7):583-9
pubmed: 16072039
Trends Plant Sci. 2006 Jan;11(1):15-9
pubmed: 16359910
New Phytol. 2021 Jan;229(2):1133-1146
pubmed: 32896925
Plant Signal Behav. 2010 Feb;5(2):94-8
pubmed: 20023411
Biomed Chromatogr. 2000 May;14(3):144-50
pubmed: 10850616
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40446
pubmed: 22792328
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2012 Aug;53(7):550-60
pubmed: 22865669
PLoS One. 2015 May 01;10(5):e0125498
pubmed: 25933033
J Exp Bot. 2013 Dec;64(17):5269-79
pubmed: 24014869
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2018 Sep;31(9):871-888
pubmed: 29781762
BMC Plant Biol. 2012 Aug 03;12:130
pubmed: 22863370