Frequency of Adverse Events in the Placebo Arms of COVID-19 Vaccine Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.


Journal

JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 01 2022
Historique:
entrez: 18 1 2022
pubmed: 19 1 2022
medline: 27 1 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Adverse events (AEs) after placebo treatment are common in randomized clinical drug trials. Systematic evidence regarding these nocebo responses in vaccine trials is important for COVID-19 vaccination worldwide especially because concern about AEs is reported to be a reason for vaccination hesitancy. To compare the frequencies of AEs reported in the placebo groups of COVID-19 vaccine trials with those reported in the vaccine groups. For this systematic review and meta-analysis, the Medline (PubMed) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were searched systematically using medical subheading terms and free-text keywords for trials of COVID-19 vaccines published up to July 14, 2021. Randomized clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccines that investigated adults aged 16 years or older were selected if they assessed solicited AEs within 7 days of injection, included an inert placebo arm, and provided AE reports for both the vaccine and placebo groups separately. Full texts were reviewed for eligibility by 2 independent reviewers. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by 2 reviewers, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline and using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Meta-analyses were based on random-effects models. The primary outcomes were the proportions of placebo recipients reporting overall, systemic, and local (injection-site) AEs as well as logarithmic odds ratios (ORs) to evaluate group differences. Outcomes were tested for significance using z tests with 95% CIs. Twelve articles with AE reports for 45 380 participants (22 578 placebo recipients and 22 802 vaccine recipients) were analyzed. After the first dose, 35.2% (95% CI, 26.7%-43.7%) of placebo recipients experienced systemic AEs, with headache (19.3%; 95% CI, 13.6%-25.1%) and fatigue (16.7%; 95% CI, 9.8%-23.6%) being most common. After the second dose, 31.8% (95% CI, 28.7%-35.0%) of placebo recipients reported systemic AEs. The ratio between placebo and vaccine arms showed that nocebo responses accounted for 76.0% of systemic AEs after the first COVID-19 vaccine dose and for 51.8% after the second dose. Significantly more vaccine recipients reported AEs, but the group difference for systemic AEs was small after the first dose (OR, -0.47; 95% CI, -0.54 to -0.40; P < .001; standardized mean difference, -0.26; 95% CI, -0.30 to -0.22) and large after the second dose (OR, -1.36; 95% CI, -1.86 to -0.86; P < .001; standardized mean difference, -0.75; 95% CI, -1.03 to -0.47). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, significantly more AEs were reported in vaccine groups compared with placebo groups, but the rates of reported AEs in the placebo arms were still substantial. Public vaccination programs should consider these high rates of AEs in placebo arms.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35040967
pii: 2788172
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.43955
pmc: PMC8767431
doi:

Substances chimiques

COVID-19 Vaccines 0
Placebos 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e2143955

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Références

Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539-58
pubmed: 12111919
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun 07;:
pubmed: 34091518
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;21(9):1257-1270
pubmed: 33887209
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71
pubmed: 33782057
Biometrics. 2000 Jun;56(2):455-63
pubmed: 10877304
Neuroscience. 2007 Jun 29;147(2):260-71
pubmed: 17379417
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 May - Jun;7(5):1550-1559
pubmed: 30682576
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):403-416
pubmed: 33378609
BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928
pubmed: 22008217
Vaccine. 2021 May 12;39(20):2791-2799
pubmed: 33707061
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Jan 30;215(1):82-6
pubmed: 24210741
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 26;12(1):e0170550
pubmed: 28125629
Vaccine. 2021 Apr 8;39(15):2024-2034
pubmed: 33722411
N Engl J Med. 1968 Sep 26;279(13):678-9
pubmed: 5670907
Drug Saf. 2009;32(11):1041-56
pubmed: 19810776
Pain. 2012 Dec;153(12):2473-2477
pubmed: 23084328
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 19;11:575950
pubmed: 33192883
Trials. 2018 Dec 11;19(1):674
pubmed: 30526685
Nat Med. 2021 Jun;27(6):1062-1070
pubmed: 33888900
N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 23;385(13):1172-1183
pubmed: 34192426
Lancet. 2021 Feb 20;397(10275):682-694
pubmed: 33524311
J Neurosci. 2006 Nov 15;26(46):12014-22
pubmed: 17108175
J Community Health. 2021 Apr;46(2):270-277
pubmed: 33389421
Ann Behav Med. 2019 Jun 4;53(7):621-629
pubmed: 30204841
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Apr;20(4):405-15
pubmed: 21442687
Vaccine. 2012 Dec 17;31(1):213-8
pubmed: 23123019
Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(3):22-9
pubmed: 22416745
Pain. 2009 Dec;146(3):261-269
pubmed: 19781854
Vaccine. 2011 Oct 13;29(44):7599-601
pubmed: 21827812
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 10;383(24):2320-2332
pubmed: 32877576
Int J Behav Med. 2018 Aug;25(4):381-389
pubmed: 29785686
BMJ. 2021 May 20;373:n1138
pubmed: 34016653
Front Pharmacol. 2019 May 17;10:502
pubmed: 31156432
N Engl J Med. 2021 May 20;384(20):1899-1909
pubmed: 33951374
JAMA. 2002 Feb 6;287(5):622-7
pubmed: 11829702
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Oct;21(10):1383-1394
pubmed: 33887208
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Apr;14(4):439-444
pubmed: 33682603
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020 Jul 2;16(7):1675-1684
pubmed: 31977275
J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Nov;49(11):1271-6
pubmed: 8892495
N Engl J Med. 2021 May 20;384(20):1885-1898
pubmed: 33725432
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 31;383(27):2603-2615
pubmed: 33301246
Vaccine. 2020 Jun 2;38(27):4230-4235
pubmed: 32386745
N Engl J Med. 2021 May 13;384(19):1824-1835
pubmed: 33440088
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Jul;26(7):731-741
pubmed: 28176407
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 17;383(25):2439-2450
pubmed: 33053279
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 25;10:504
pubmed: 31427995

Auteurs

Julia W Haas (JW)

Program in Placebo Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Division of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Friederike L Bender (FL)

Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Sarah Ballou (S)

Program in Placebo Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Division of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

John M Kelley (JM)

Program in Placebo Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Psychology, Endicott College, Beverly, Massachusetts.

Marcel Wilhelm (M)

Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Franklin G Miller (FG)

Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.

Winfried Rief (W)

Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Ted J Kaptchuk (TJ)

Program in Placebo Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH