Robotic Donor Hysterectomy Results in Technical Success and Live Births After Uterus Transplantation: Subanalysis Within the Dallas Uterus Transplant Study (DUETS) Clinical Trial.
Journal
Clinical obstetrics and gynecology
ISSN: 1532-5520
Titre abrégé: Clin Obstet Gynecol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0070014
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 03 2022
01 03 2022
Historique:
entrez:
19
1
2022
pubmed:
20
1
2022
medline:
7
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Minimally invasive procurement of uterine grafts for transplantation can decrease living donor recovery time. We examined recipient outcomes for grafts procured by robotic-assisted donor hysterectomies with transvaginal extraction in the Dallas UtErus Transplant Study (DUETS). All 5 grafts were successfully transplanted. Recipients had a median 4.5-hour surgical time, 0.25 L estimated blood loss, and 4-day hospital stay. Four recipients had grade III surgical complications and three had acute cellular rejection. At 18 months, graft viability was 100%, with an 80% live birth rate. This report demonstrates the feasibility and reproducible success of using uterus grafts from living donors who underwent robotic-assisted donor hysterectomy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35045026
doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000678
pii: 00003081-202203000-00009
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
59-67Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Lavoué V, Vigneau C, Duros S, et al. Which donor for uterus transplants: brain-dead donor or living donor? A systematic review. Transplantation. 2017;101:267–273.
Matoba Y, Kisu I, Banno K, et al. Operative and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive living-donor surgery on uterus transplantation: a literature review. J Clin Med. 2021;10:349.
Wall AE, Johannesson L, Sok M, et al. Decision making and informed consent in uterus transplant recipients: a mixed-methods study of the Dallas Uterus Transplant Study (DUETS) participants. Am J Surg. 2021;222:819–824.
Wei L, Xue T, Tao KS, et al. Modified human uterus transplantation using ovarian veins for venous drainage: the first report of surgically successful robotic-assisted uterus procurement and follow-up for 12 months. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:346.e1–356.e1.
Tzvetanov I, Bejarano-Pineda L, Giulianotti PC, et al. State of the art of robotic surgery in organ transplantation. World J Surg. 2013;37:2791–2799.
Ayoubi JM, Carbonnel M, Pirtea P, et al. Laparotomy or minimal invasive surgery in uterus transplantation: a comparison. Fertil Steril. 2019;112:11–18.
Puntambekar S, Puntambekar S, Telang M, et al. Novel anastomotic technique for uterine transplant using utero-ovarian veins for venous drainage and internal iliac arteries for perfusion in two laparoscopically harvested uteri. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26:628–635.
Puntambekar S, Telang M, Kulkarni P, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted uterus retrieval from live organ donors for uterine transplant: our experience of two patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25:622–631.
Brännström M, Dahm-Kähler P, Ekberg J, et al. Outcome of recipient surgery and 6-month follow-up of the Swedish live donor robotic uterus transplantation trial. J Clin Med. 2020;9:2338.
Brännström M, Dahm-Kähler P, Kvarnström N, et al. Live birth after robotic-assisted live donor uterus transplantation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99:1222–1229.
Brännström M, Kvarnström N, Groth K, et al. Evolution of surgical steps in robotics-assisted donor surgery for uterus transplantation: results of the eight cases in the Swedish trial. Fertil Steril. 2020;114:1097–1107.
Falcone T, Richards EG. Balancing innovation and safety: robotic-assisted donor surgery in uterus transplantation. Fertil Steril. 2020;114:976–977.
Johannesson L, Koon EC, Bayer J, et al. Dallas UtErus Transplant Study: early outcomes and complications of robot-assisted hysterectomy for living uterus donors. Transplantation. 2021;105:225–230.
Carmona F, Rius M, Díaz-Feijoo B, et al. Uterine transplantation. First viable case in Southern Europe. Med Clin (Barc). 2021;156:297–300.
Huang Y, Ding X, Chen B, et al. Report of the first live birth after uterus transplantation in People’s Republic of China. Fertil Steril. 2020;114:1108–1115.
Testa G, McKenna GJ, Bayer J, et al. The evolution of transplantation from saving lives to fertility treatment: DUETS (Dallas UtErus Transplant Study). Ann Surg. 2020;272:411–417.
Johannesson L, Wallis K, Koon EC, et al. Living uterus donation and transplantation: experience of interest and screening in a single center in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218:331.e1–331.e7.
Johannesson L, Testa G, Flyckt R, et al. Guidelines for standardized nomenclature and reporting in uterus transplantation: an opinion from the United States Uterus Transplant Consortium. Am J Transplant. 2020;20:3319–3325.
Testa G, Koon EC, Johannesson L, et al. Living donor uterus transplantation: a single center’s observations and lessons learned from early setbacks to technical success. Am J Transplant. 2017;17:2901–2910.
Agarwal A, Johannesson L, Findeis SK, et al. Clinicopathologic analysis of uterine allografts including proposed scoring of ischemia-reperfusion injury and T cell-mediated rejection—Dallas UtErus Transplant Study: a pilot study. Transplantation. 2021. doi:10.1097/TP.0000000000003633
doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003633
Johannesson L, Wall A, Warren AM, et al. Decisions on second pregnancy after uterus transplantation and timing for removal of the uterus-DUETS (Dallas UtErus Transplant Study). BJOG. 2021;128:1610–1614.
Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–196.
Jones BP, Saso S, Bracewell-Milnes T, et al. Human uterine transplantation: a review of outcomes from the first 45 cases. BJOG. 2019;126:1310–1319.
Johannesson L, Testa G, Putman JM, et al. Twelve live births after uterus transplantation in the Dallas UtErus Transplant Study. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137:241–249.