When Fathers Feel Socially Constrained to Assume a Role: A Negative Predictor of the Coparental Relationship in Switzerland.
cohesive coparenting
fathers
motivation
non-cohesive coparenting
role distribution
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
03
08
2021
accepted:
10
12
2021
entrez:
20
1
2022
pubmed:
21
1
2022
medline:
21
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Role distribution is a central issue for parents in the transition to parenthood, but little is known about the motivations in fathers to assume a specific role. Differences in work-family balance in each parent may be motivated by an individual choice mutually shared by both partners; however, in many couples, the parents may feel forced to adopt a traditional role distribution, either for financial reasons, or to comply with social expectations about what men and women should do when they are parents. This feeling of being socially constrained to adopt a role distribution that is not congruent with intrinsic motivations can generate dissatisfaction and may jeopardize the development of the interparental relationship. Coparenting refers to the emotional and instrumental support parents bring to each other in their parental tasks. It has been shown to be central in family functioning and a powerful predictor of children's emotional and cognitive development. In this study, we aimed to assess the extent to which different motivations for role distribution in fathers are predictive of the quality of the coparental relationship. A convenience sample of 144 fathers from the French-speaking part of Switzerland completed online questionnaires about their motivations, coparental relationship, and sociodemographic characteristics. Results showed that the reasons for role distribution were mainly economical, practical, and in order to meet personal expectations. Multivariate general linear modeling showed that role distribution that is constrained to meet social expectations and age were predictive of a less cohesive coparental relationship, whereas a deliberate choice in role distribution was linked to a more cohesive coparental relationship.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35046866
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.752805
pmc: PMC8761969
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
752805Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Favez, Max, Bader and Tissot.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Parent Sci Pract. 2012 Jan 1;12(1):1-21
pubmed: 23166477
J Marriage Fam. 2017 Feb;79(1):261-276
pubmed: 28082750
J Occup Health Psychol. 2000 Apr;5(2):278-308
pubmed: 10784291
Parent Sci Pract. 2003 Jan 1;3(2):95-131
pubmed: 21980259
Fam Process. 2014 Mar;53(1):80-96
pubmed: 24236848
Eur J Popul. 2019 Jan 23;35(5):987-1021
pubmed: 31832033
AJS. 2012 Mar;117(5):1422-1459
pubmed: 26379287
J Occup Health Psychol. 2011 Apr;16(2):151-69
pubmed: 21280939
Am Psychol. 2001 Oct;56(10):781-96
pubmed: 11675985
J Fam Psychol. 2000 Jun;14(2):200-19
pubmed: 10870290
J Fam Psychol. 2004 Mar;18(1):225-36
pubmed: 14992623
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2005 Mar-Apr;34(2):190-200
pubmed: 15781596