The Evaluation of the Four-Chamber Cardiac Dissection Method of the Fetal Heart as an Alternative to Conventional Inflow-Outflow Dissection in Small Gestational-Age Fetuses.
congenital
fetus diagnostic imaging
fetus pathology
heart defects
high-field magnetic resonance imaging
macroscopy
magnetic resonance imaging
microscopy
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Jan 2022
17 Jan 2022
Historique:
received:
24
10
2021
revised:
27
12
2021
accepted:
04
01
2022
entrez:
21
1
2022
pubmed:
22
1
2022
medline:
22
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The examination of very small fetal hearts requires special equipment and a specialist that are not available in many general pathology laboratories. Compared to conventional examination, the four-chamber cardiac dissection (4CCD) method can be performed by any pathologist using instruments generally available in pathology services. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of the 4CCD method in the examination of small fetal hearts using post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging (pm-MRI) at 7T as the standard. Twelve fetuses with gestational ages between 13 and 19 weeks have been included in this study. All fetuses underwent pm-MRI examination prior to pathologic examination. The 4CCD method was used for the cardiac examination in all cases following the same guidelines for cardiac sectioning. The 4CCD was able to identify all cardiac anatomic structures as compared to pm-MRI at 7T, demonstrating a sensibility of 95.8% (95% CI, 94.5-95.8) and specificity of 100% (95% CI, 32.3-100). The overall accuracy in identifying cardiac anatomic structures was 95.8% (95% CI, 93.4-95.8). Additionally, the 4CCD method was able to detect cardiac anomalies with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 91% (95% CI, 85.8-94.2), sensibility of 67.6% (95% CI, 54.5-75.3), and specificity of 97% (95% CI, 93.7-99) as compared to pm-MRI at 7T. The four-chamber view dissection method can be considered as an alternative to the conventional inflow-outflow dissection method in selected cases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35054392
pii: diagnostics12010223
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12010223
pmc: PMC8775121
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2018 Jun;301(6):987-997
pubmed: 29663733
Prenat Diagn. 2019 Jun;39(7):505-518
pubmed: 30980413
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;223(4):493-515
pubmed: 32376319
Prenat Diagn. 2020 Jan;40(1):28-37
pubmed: 31525275
Lancet. 2009 Aug 8;374(9688):467-75
pubmed: 19665645
Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2009 Jan;2(1):24-35
pubmed: 20300266
Lancet. 2013 Jul 20;382(9888):223-33
pubmed: 23683720
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013 Feb;137(2):228-32
pubmed: 23368865
Cardiovasc Pathol. 2021 Mar-Apr;51:107312
pubmed: 33212288
Prenat Diagn. 2013 Apr;33(4):318-27
pubmed: 23457008
Ginekol Pol. 2010 Mar;81(3):197-202
pubmed: 20486541
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017 Feb;141(2):209-214
pubmed: 27788335
Pediatr Radiol. 2015 Apr;45(4):549-55
pubmed: 25828357
Prenat Diagn. 2014 Mar;34(3):223-9
pubmed: 24243492