Pain Management Strategies among Cancer Patients. Normalization of the CSQ (The Pain Coping Strategies Questionnaire) Form.
CSQ
cancer
cancer patients
normalization
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 01 2022
17 01 2022
Historique:
received:
08
12
2021
revised:
07
01
2022
accepted:
14
01
2022
entrez:
21
1
2022
pubmed:
22
1
2022
medline:
26
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cancer is associated with chronic pain, which significantly reduces the quality of life. The level of pain depends on the dominant pain management strategy that the patient uses. This study seeks to evaluate the application of the Pain Coping Strategies Questionnaire among cancer patients and develop norms allowing differentiation of patients with diagnosed cancer in terms of pain management strategies. The study involved 1187 patients diagnosed with malignant cancer, who are under outpatient care of the Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute-Oncology Center in Warsaw. The study used the Pain Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) elaborated by A.K. Rosentel and F.J. Keefe. Socioeconomic variables and medical factors affect pain management strategies chosen by patients. The area most strongly differentiated by the studied variables is praying/hoping. Factors that have the greatest impact on the choice of pain management strategies for cancer patients include education, income, and radiation therapy. Sten standards were developed to determine the severity of pain management strategies used in the low-average-high categories. The CSQ questionnaire should be used in cancer patients, and the result of the strategy used can be a prognostic factor for the expected effects of therapy. Knowledge of the variables most strongly affecting patients' choice of strategies that are not conducive to strengthening health attitudes and the ability to determine the severity of pain management strategies on standard scales allows us to focus psychotherapeutic activities on patients who need support most.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35055835
pii: ijerph19021013
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19021013
pmc: PMC8775893
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Eur J Pain. 2008 Aug;12(6):749-56
pubmed: 18096418
Rehabil Psychol. 2013 Nov;58(4):386-395
pubmed: 24128268
J Rehabil Med. 2005 Mar;37(2):100-7
pubmed: 15788345
Clin J Pain. 1997 Mar;13(1):43-9
pubmed: 9084951
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Oct 22;2018:7598632
pubmed: 30426013
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 May 24;14:67
pubmed: 23705997
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013 Mar;40(2):120-31
pubmed: 23448737
Pain Res Manag. 2015 Jan-Feb;20(1):48-55
pubmed: 24927488
Pain. 2013 Dec;154(12):2775-2781
pubmed: 23969326