Analysis of oxidative degradation and calcification behavior of a silicone polycarbonate polyurethane-polydimethylsiloxane material.
CarboSil
biodegradation
calcification
oxidation
polydimethylsiloxane
Journal
Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A
ISSN: 1552-4965
Titre abrégé: J Biomed Mater Res A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101234237
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2022
05 2022
Historique:
revised:
22
10
2021
received:
12
03
2021
accepted:
20
12
2021
pubmed:
22
1
2022
medline:
26
4
2022
entrez:
21
1
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The biocompatibility and chemical stability of implantable devices are crucial for their long-term success. CarboSil® is a silicon polycarbonate polyurethane copolymer with good biocompatibility and biostability properties. Here, we explored the possibility to improve these characteristics by introducing 30% of extra-chain cross-linkable poly(dimethyl siloxane) (PDMS). Patches made of CarboSil and CarboSil-30% PDMS were manufactured by spray, phase-inversion technique and subjected to a heating-pressure treatment. Both materials showed good biocompatibility, either in viability and proliferation of cell-based experiments both with mouse fibroblasts and subcutaneous implant in rats. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy showed a significant decrease in soft segment loss in CarboSil-30% PDMS samples with respect to CarboSil in in vitro accelerated oxidative treatments with CoCl
Substances chimiques
Biocompatible Materials
0
Dimethylpolysiloxanes
0
Polycarboxylate Cement
0
Polyurethanes
0
Silicones
0
polycarbonate
25766-59-0
baysilon
63148-62-9
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1109-1120Informations de copyright
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Wang W, Wang C. 3 - Polyurethane for Biomedical Applications: A Review of Recent Developments A2 - Davim, J. Paulo BT-The Design and Manufacture of Medical Devices. Woodhead Publishing Reviews; 2012:115-151 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9781907568725500030
Wheatley DJ, Raco L, Bernacca GM, Sim I, Belcher PR, Boyd JS. Polyurethane: material for the next generation of heart valve prostheses? Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg. 2000;17(4):440-448.
Daebritz SH, Sachweh JS, Hermanns B, et al. Introduction of a flexible polymeric heart valve prosthesis with special design for mitral position. Circulation. 2003;108:134-139.
Boloori Zadeh P, Corbett SC, Nayeb-Hashemi H. In-vitro calcification study of polyurethane heart valves. Mater Sci Eng C. 2014;35(1):335-340.
Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol. 2008:20:86-100.
Matheson LA, Labow RS, Santerre JP. Biodegradation of polycarbonate-based polyurethanes by the human monocyte-derived macrophage and U937 cell systems. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;61(4):505-513.
Christenson EM, Anderson JM, Hiltner A. Oxidative mechanisms of poly(carbonate urethane) and poly(ether urethane) biodegradation: in vivo and in vitro correlations. J Biomed Mater Res - Part A. 2004;70(2):245-255.
Gallagher G, Padsalgikar A, Tkatchouk E, Jenney C, Iacob C, Runt J. Environmental stress cracking performance of polyether and PDMS-based polyurethanes in an in vitro oxidation model. J Biomed Mater Res - Part B Appl Biomater. 2017;105(6):1544-1558.
Stokes K, Mcvenes R, Anderson JM. Polyurethane elastomer biostability. J Biomater Appl. 1995;9(4):321-354.
Salacinski HJ, Tai NR, Carson RJ, Edwards A, Hamilton G, Seifalian AM. In vitro stability of a novel compliant poly(carbonate-urea) urethane to oxidative and hydrolytic stress. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;59(2):207-218.
Ward RS, Jones RL. Polyurethanes and Silicone Polyurethane Copolymers. Comprehensive Biomaterials; 2011:431-477.
Labow RS, Meek E, Santerre JP. Hydrolytic degradation of poly(carbonate)-urethanes. Biomaterials. 2001;22:3025-3033.
Khan I, Smith N, Jones E, Finch DS, Cameron RE. Analysis and evaluation of a biomedical polycarbonate urethane tested in an in vitro study and an ovine arthroplasty model. Part I: materials selection and evaluation. Biomaterials. 2005;26(6):621-631.
Ward B, Anderson J, Ebert M, McVenes R, Stokes K. In vivo biostability of polysiloxane polyether polyurethanes: resistance to metal ion oxidation. J Biomed Mater Res - Part A. 2006;77(2):380-389.
Ward R, Anderson J, McVenes R, Stokes K. In vivo biostability of polysiloxane polyether polyurethanes: resistance to biologic oxidation and stress cracking. J Biomed Mater Res - Part A. 2006;77(3):580-589.
Takahara A, Coury AJ, Hergenrother RW, Cooper SL. Effect of soft segment chemistry on the biostability of segmented polyurethanes. I. In vitro oxidation. J Biomed Mater Res. 1991;25(3):341-356.
Gunatillake PA, Martin DJ, Meijs GF, McCarthy SJ, Adhikari R. Designing biostable polyurethane elastomers for biomedical implants. Aust J Chem. 2003;56(6):545-557.
Ward RS. Thermoplastic silicone-urethane copolymers: a new class of biomedical elastomers. Med Device Diagnostic Ind. 2000;22(4):68-77.
Cavallo A, Gasparotti E, Losi P, et al. Fabrication and in-vitro characterization of a polymeric aortic valve for minimally invasive valve replacement. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021;115:104294.
Soldani G, Losi P, Bernabei M, et al. Long term performance of small-diameter vascular grafts made of a poly(ether)urethane-polydimethylsiloxane semi-interpenetrating polymeric network. Biomaterials. 2010;31(9):2592-2605.
Wadkins CL, Luben RA. Effects of fluoride on in vitro calcification of tendon matrix. Calcif Tissue Res. 1978;26(1):51-59.
Zhang Z, Guidoin R, King MW, How TV, Marois Y, Laroche G. Removing fresh tissue from explanted polyurethane prostheses: which approach facilitates physico-chemical analysis? Biomaterials. 1995;16(5):369-380.
Dempsey DK, Carranza C, Chawla CP, et al. Comparative analysis of in vitro oxidative degradation of poly(carbonate urethanes) for biostability screening. J Biomed Mater Res - Part A. 2014;102(10):3649-3665.
Ignatius AA, Claes LE. In vitro biocompatibility of bioresorbable polymers: poly(L, DL-lactide) and poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide). Biomaterials. 1996;17(8):831-839.
Lee SY, Bang S, Kim S, et al. Synthesis and in vitro characterizations of porous carboxymethyl cellulose-poly(ethylene oxide) hydrogel film. Biomater Res. 2015;19:12.
Briganti E, Losi P, Raffi A, Scoccianti M, Munaò A, Soldani G. Silicone based polyurethane materials: a promising biocompatible elastomeric formulation for cardiovascular applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2006;17(3):259-266.
Christenson EM, Anderson JM, Hiltner A. Antioxidant inhibition of poly(carbonate urethane) in vivo biodegradation. J Biomed Mater Res - Part A. 2006;76(3):480-490.
Chandy T, Van Hee J, Nettekoven W, Johnson J. Long-term in vitro stability assessment of polycarbonate urethane micro catheters: resistance to oxidation and stress cracking. J Biomed Mater Res - Part B Appl Biomater. 2009;89(2):314-324.
Faré S, Petrini P, Motta A, Cigada A, Tanzi MC. Synergistic effects of oxidative environments and mechanical stress on in vitro stability of polyetherurethanes and polycarbonateurethanes. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;45(1):62-74.
Christenson EM, Dadsetan M, Anderson JM, Hiltner A. Biostability and Macrophage-Mediated Foreign Body Reaction of Silicone-Modified Polyurethanes. J Biomed Mater Res - Part A; 2005:141-155.
Hernandez R, Weksler J, Padsalgikar A, Runt J. In vitro oxidation of high polydimethylsiloxane content biomedical polyurethanes: correlation with the microstructure. J Biomed Mater Res - Part A. 2008;87(2):546-556.
Zhu R, Wang X, Yang J, et al. Influence of hydroxyl-terminated polydimethylsiloxane on high-strength biocompatible polycarbonate urethane films. Biomed Mater. 2017;12(1):015011.
Golomb G, Wagner D. Development of a new in vitro model for studying implantable polyurethane calcification. Biomaterials. 1991;12(4):397-405.
Thoma RJ. Poly(ether) urethane reactivity with metal-ion in calcification and environmental stress cracking. J Biomater Appl. 1986;1(3):449-486.
Yang M, Zhang Z, Hahn C, King MW, Guidoin R. Assessing the resistance to calcification of polyurethane membranes used in the manufacture of ventricles for a totally implantable artificial heart. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;48(5):648-659.
Dabagh M, Abdekhodaie MJ, Khorasani MT. Effects of polydimethylsiloxane grafting on the calcification, physical properties, and biocompatibility of polyurethane in a heart valve. J Appl Polym Sci. 2005;98(2):758-766.
Tang YW, Labow RS, Santerre JP. Enzyme-induced biodegradation of polycarbonate polyurethanes: dependence on hard-segment concentration. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;56(4):516-528.
Tang YW, Labow RS, Santerre JP. Enzyme induced biodegradation of polycarbonate-polyurethanes: dose dependence effect of cholesterol esterase. Biomaterials. 2003;24(12):2003-2011.
Enayati M, Puchhammer S, Iturri J, et al. Assessment of a long-term in vitro model to characterize the mechanical behavior and macrophage-mediated degradation of a novel, degradable, electrospun poly-urethane vascular graft. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;112:104077.
Alexandre N, Ribeiro J, Gärtner A, et al. Biocompatibility and hemocompatibility of polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel used for vascular grafting-in vitro and in vivo studies. J Biomed Mater Res - Part A. 2014;102(12):4262-4275.
Belladonna FG, Calasans-Maia MD, Novellino Alves AT, et al. Biocompatibility of a self-adhesive gutta-percha-based material in subcutaneous tissue of mice. J Endod. 2014;40(11):1869-1873.
Chanda J, Rao SB, Mohanty M, et al. Prevention of calcification of tissue valves. Artif Organs. 1994;18(10):752-757.
Zhou J, Jiang H, Wang D, Hu S. A novel anti-calcification strategy of bovine pericardium using sodium bisulfite modification. J Heart Valve Dis. 2009;18(2):180-186.
Mahara A, Sago M, Yamaguchi H, et al. Micro-CT evaluation of high pressure-decellularized cardiovascular tissues transplanted in rat subcutaneous accelerated-calcification model. J Artif Organs. 2015;18(2):143-150.