Practical treatment guidance for cancer-associated thrombosis - Managing the challenging patient: A consensus statement.
Algorithm
Cancer-associated thrombosis
Consensus
Guidelines
Treatment
Journal
Critical reviews in oncology/hematology
ISSN: 1879-0461
Titre abrégé: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8916049
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2022
Mar 2022
Historique:
received:
01
06
2021
revised:
07
01
2022
accepted:
17
01
2022
pubmed:
23
1
2022
medline:
3
3
2022
entrez:
22
1
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a leading cause of death amongst people with cancer. Treatment decisions have become increasingly complex with the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants and existing guidelines are limited to evidence from patients meeting stringent trial-entry criteria. To assist decision making for healthcare professionals managing CAT in challenging 'real-world' situations, an expert working group of clinicians from oncology, haematology and pharmacology convened over a series of virtual meetings between September 2020 and January 2021 to catalogue the most challenging clinical problems and define consensus recommendations. Clinical problems were divided amongst the group members according to their areas of expertise, with each reviewing the literature and writing their recommendations. Using a web-based file-sharing platform, each contribution was reviewed until consensus was reached. Each clinical problem is discussed; these include managing gastrointestinal impairment, renal impairment, liver impairment, increased risk of bleeding, extremes of body weight, drug interactions, anticoagulation beyond the initial six months and managing recurrent thrombosis. A user-friendly, practical, colour-coded algorithm was produced to help guide clinical decision-making in CAT. Red highlights decision steps where shared decision making, such as with the multi-disciplinary team, is recommended. Amber steps reflect uncertainty of existing evidence. Multiple amber steps per patient warrant increased caution. Making anticoagulation decisions in people with cancer is challenging; it is important that healthcare providers can discuss where there is a lack of evidence and ensure that patient preference is given priority. This algorithm and consensus recommendations are a useful tool to guide these complex discussions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35065219
pii: S1040-8428(22)00023-3
doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103599
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anticoagulants
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
103599Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.