Implantable loop recorder for monitoring patients with congenital heart disease.

Adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) arrhythmias cryptogenic stroke embolic strokes of undetermined source (ESUS) implantable loop recorder patient management sudden cardiac death

Journal

Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy
ISSN: 2223-3652
Titre abrégé: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101601613

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Historique:
received: 30 07 2020
accepted: 16 11 2020
entrez: 24 1 2022
pubmed: 25 1 2022
medline: 25 1 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Patients with congenital heart defects (CHD) are prone to residua, sequels and complications from the underlying anomaly, where cardiac arrhythmias are one of the major causes for hospitalization, morbidity and mortality. The importance of the subcutaneous implantable loop recorder (ILR) for the detection and documentation of significant arrhythmias has increased over the last years. To date, however, there is little data on ILR use in the CHD population. In this single center, retrospective observational study, all CHD-patients with an ILR were identified who were under care of the German Heart Center Munich between February 2015 and January 2019. The primary endpoint of the study was the detection or exclusion of significant arrhythmias during follow-up in CHD-patients who had received an ILR. The secondary endpoint was to determine whether ILR findings influenced patient management, defined as initiation or adjustment of medication, cardioversion, electrophysiologic study, catheter ablation, or implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) such as pacemakers (PM) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. An ILR was implanted in 33 CHD-patients (mean age, 43±20 years; 42.4% female) with CHD. During a mean observation period of 697±433 days, clinically relevant arrhythmias, correlating with the patients' complaints and symptoms, were detected in 19 patients (59.4%), encompassing supraventricular tachycardia (n=10), supraventricular or ventricular ectopic beats (n=10), non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (n=2), ventricular tachycardia (n=2), and bradycardia (n=2). In 9 patients (28.1%) the detected arrhythmia was considered an event requiring treatment. Treatment modalities included catheter ablation (n=5), modification of antiarrhythmic drug regime (n=2), adaptation of anticoagulation therapy (n=2), or implantation of a subcutaneous ICD (n=1). Regarding the occurrence of cardiac arrhythmias or a related need for therapeutic intervention, no significant differences were identified with respect to WHO functional class, the presence of pulmonary arterial hypertension or reduced resting peripheral oxygen saturation. In symptomatic CHD-patients at risk for life-threatening cardiac events, ILR has a considerable complementary diagnostic value for the detection and differentiation of benign and malignant arrhythmias. Considering the overall low risk of complications, ILR implantation should be considered in patients with CHD of any complexity who need medium or long-term arrhythmia monitoring, especially if short-term Holter monitoring cannot provide sufficient diagnostic certainty.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Patients with congenital heart defects (CHD) are prone to residua, sequels and complications from the underlying anomaly, where cardiac arrhythmias are one of the major causes for hospitalization, morbidity and mortality. The importance of the subcutaneous implantable loop recorder (ILR) for the detection and documentation of significant arrhythmias has increased over the last years. To date, however, there is little data on ILR use in the CHD population.
METHODS METHODS
In this single center, retrospective observational study, all CHD-patients with an ILR were identified who were under care of the German Heart Center Munich between February 2015 and January 2019. The primary endpoint of the study was the detection or exclusion of significant arrhythmias during follow-up in CHD-patients who had received an ILR. The secondary endpoint was to determine whether ILR findings influenced patient management, defined as initiation or adjustment of medication, cardioversion, electrophysiologic study, catheter ablation, or implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) such as pacemakers (PM) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.
RESULTS RESULTS
An ILR was implanted in 33 CHD-patients (mean age, 43±20 years; 42.4% female) with CHD. During a mean observation period of 697±433 days, clinically relevant arrhythmias, correlating with the patients' complaints and symptoms, were detected in 19 patients (59.4%), encompassing supraventricular tachycardia (n=10), supraventricular or ventricular ectopic beats (n=10), non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (n=2), ventricular tachycardia (n=2), and bradycardia (n=2). In 9 patients (28.1%) the detected arrhythmia was considered an event requiring treatment. Treatment modalities included catheter ablation (n=5), modification of antiarrhythmic drug regime (n=2), adaptation of anticoagulation therapy (n=2), or implantation of a subcutaneous ICD (n=1). Regarding the occurrence of cardiac arrhythmias or a related need for therapeutic intervention, no significant differences were identified with respect to WHO functional class, the presence of pulmonary arterial hypertension or reduced resting peripheral oxygen saturation.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
In symptomatic CHD-patients at risk for life-threatening cardiac events, ILR has a considerable complementary diagnostic value for the detection and differentiation of benign and malignant arrhythmias. Considering the overall low risk of complications, ILR implantation should be considered in patients with CHD of any complexity who need medium or long-term arrhythmia monitoring, especially if short-term Holter monitoring cannot provide sufficient diagnostic certainty.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35070802
doi: 10.21037/cdt-20-677
pii: cdt-11-06-1334
pmc: PMC8748482
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1334-1343

Informations de copyright

2021 Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/cdt-20-677). The series “Current Management Aspects in Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ACHD): Part IV” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. HK serves as an unpaid editorial board member of Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy from February 2018 to January 2022. and served as the unpaid Guest Editor of the series. CK reports non-financial support from Abbott Medical, personal fees and non-financial support from Biotronik, personal fees from Bristol-Myers-Squibb, personal fees from Microport, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Philips, other from Abbott Medical, from Biotronik, other from Boston Scientific, other from Microport, outside the submitted work. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Références

JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Feb;5(2):245-251
pubmed: 30784698
Am J Cardiol. 2000 Nov 15;86(10):1111-6
pubmed: 11074209
Eur Heart J. 2007 Aug;28(15):1854-61
pubmed: 17030523
Circulation. 2019 Apr 2;139(14):e698-e800
pubmed: 30586767
Congenit Heart Dis. 2019 Sep;14(5):745-751
pubmed: 31313513
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Apr 15;305:63-69
pubmed: 32057477
Eur Heart J. 2016 May 07;37(18):1439-48
pubmed: 26873095
Clin Res Cardiol. 2012 Jul;101(7):509-19
pubmed: 22314278
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Sep 25;50(13):1263-71
pubmed: 17888844
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2013 May;24(4):141-5
pubmed: 24217047
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jul 28;54(5):460-7
pubmed: 19628123
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2017 Feb;142(4):301-303
pubmed: 28235231
J Atr Fibrillation. 2017 Jun 30;10(1):1612
pubmed: 29250225

Auteurs

Michael Huntgeburth (M)

Center for Adults with Congenital Heart Disease, Clinic III for Internal Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Heart Center, Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Department of Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Christopher Hohmann (C)

Center for Adults with Congenital Heart Disease, Clinic III for Internal Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Heart Center, Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Peter Ewert (P)

Department of Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Sebastian Freilinger (S)

Department of Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Nicole Nagdyman (N)

Department of Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Rhoia Neidenbach (R)

Department of Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Lars Pieper (L)

Chair of Behavioural Epidemiology, Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

Felix Pieringer (F)

Department of Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Carsten Lennerz (C)

Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Harald Kaemmerer (H)

Department of Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Christof Kolb (C)

Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Classifications MeSH