Cost-effective proactive testing strategies during COVID-19 mass vaccination: A modelling study.
COVID-19
Cost-effectiveness
Modelling
SARS-CoV-2
Testing
Vaccination
Journal
Lancet regional health. Americas
ISSN: 2667-193X
Titre abrégé: Lancet Reg Health Am
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918232503006676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2022
Apr 2022
Historique:
entrez:
24
1
2022
pubmed:
25
1
2022
medline:
25
1
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
As SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are administered worldwide, the COVID-19 pandemic continues to exact significant human and economic costs. Mass testing of unvaccinated individuals followed by isolation of positive cases can substantially mitigate risks and be tailored to local epidemiological conditions to ensure cost effectiveness. Using a multi-scale model that incorporates population-level SARS-CoV-2 transmission and individual-level viral load kinetics, we identify the optimal frequency of proactive SARS-CoV-2 testing, depending on the local transmission rate and proportion immunized. Assuming a willingness-to-pay of US$100,000 per averted year of life lost (YLL) and a price of $10 per test, the optimal strategy under a rapid transmission scenario ( Mass proactive testing and case isolation is a cost effective strategy for mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic in the initial stages of the global SARS-CoV-2 vaccination campaign and in response to resurgences of vaccine-evasive variants. US National Institutes of Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, HK Innovation and Technology Commission, China National Natural Science Foundation, European Research Council, and EPSRC Impact Acceleration Grant.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
As SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are administered worldwide, the COVID-19 pandemic continues to exact significant human and economic costs. Mass testing of unvaccinated individuals followed by isolation of positive cases can substantially mitigate risks and be tailored to local epidemiological conditions to ensure cost effectiveness.
METHODS
METHODS
Using a multi-scale model that incorporates population-level SARS-CoV-2 transmission and individual-level viral load kinetics, we identify the optimal frequency of proactive SARS-CoV-2 testing, depending on the local transmission rate and proportion immunized.
FINDINGS
RESULTS
Assuming a willingness-to-pay of US$100,000 per averted year of life lost (YLL) and a price of $10 per test, the optimal strategy under a rapid transmission scenario (
INTERPRETATION
CONCLUSIONS
Mass proactive testing and case isolation is a cost effective strategy for mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic in the initial stages of the global SARS-CoV-2 vaccination campaign and in response to resurgences of vaccine-evasive variants.
FUNDING
BACKGROUND
US National Institutes of Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, HK Innovation and Technology Commission, China National Natural Science Foundation, European Research Council, and EPSRC Impact Acceleration Grant.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35072146
doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2021.100182
pii: S2667-193X(21)00178-2
pmc: PMC8759769
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100182Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : U01 GM087719
Pays : United States
Organisme : ACL HHS
ID : U01IP001137
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : K01 AI141576
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCIRD CDC HHS
ID : U01 IP001136
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCIRD CDC HHS
ID : U01 IP001137
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
We declare no competing interests. Dr Chinazzi, Dr Pastore y Piontti and Prof. Alessandro Vespignani report grants from Metabiota Inc, outside the submitted work. Prof. Benjamin J. Cowling reports honoraria from AstraZeneca, GSK, Moderna, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi Pasteur. The authors report no other potential conflicts of interest.
Références
J Chin Med Assoc. 2020 Oct;83(10):891-894
pubmed: 32773584
Infect Dis Model. 2021;6:955-974
pubmed: 34337194
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Aug 13;70(32):1081-1083
pubmed: 34383732
Sci Adv. 2020 Jun 05;6(23):eabc0764
pubmed: 32548274
Commun Biol. 2021 Jan 5;4(1):60
pubmed: 33402722
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Dec;4(12):1303-1312
pubmed: 33199859
Lancet Microbe. 2021 Dec;2(12):e666-e675
pubmed: 34632431
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Oct 1;181(10):1407-1408
pubmed: 34048531
N Engl J Med. 2014 Aug 28;371(9):796-7
pubmed: 25162885
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Jul;27(7):1976-1979
pubmed: 34152963
Science. 2021 Jan 8;371(6525):126-127
pubmed: 33414210
J Prev Med Public Health. 2020 May;53(3):151-157
pubmed: 32498136
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Nov 06;69(44):1631-1634
pubmed: 33151916
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Mar;6(3):e184-e191
pubmed: 33549196
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 28;117(30):17513-17515
pubmed: 32632012
JAMA Health Forum. 2020 May 1;1(5):e200510
pubmed: 36218490
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 12;12(1):323
pubmed: 33436609
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;20(6):669-677
pubmed: 32240634
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):403-416
pubmed: 33378609
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 20;383(8):e56
pubmed: 32767891
Lancet. 2021 Mar 13;397(10278):1023-1034
pubmed: 33587887
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 26;383(22):e120
pubmed: 32997903
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):998-999
pubmed: 33566056