A taxonomy of childhood pedal cyclist injuries from latent class analysis: associations with factors pertinent to prevention.
Journal
Injury epidemiology
ISSN: 2197-1714
Titre abrégé: Inj Epidemiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101652639
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Jan 2022
24 Jan 2022
Historique:
received:
09
07
2021
accepted:
01
12
2021
entrez:
25
1
2022
pubmed:
26
1
2022
medline:
26
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Studies of pedal cyclist injuries have largely focused on individual injury categories, but every region of the cyclist's body is exposed to potential trauma. Real-world injury patterns can be complex, and isolated injuries to one body part are uncommon among casualties requiring hospitalization. Latent class analysis (LCA) may identify important patterns in heterogeneous samples of qualitative data. Data were taken from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program of the American College of Surgeons for 2017. Inclusion criteria were age 18 years or less and an external cause of injury code for pedal cyclist. Injuries were characterized by Abbreviated Injury Scale codes. Injury categories and the total number of injuries served as covariates for LCA. A model was selected on the basis of the Akaike and Bayesian information criteria and the interpretability of the classes. Associations were analyzed between class membership and demographic factors, circumstantial factors, metrics of injury severity, and helmet wear. Within-class associations of helmet wear with injury severity were analyzed as well. There were 6151 injured pediatric pedal cyclists in the study sample. The mortality rate was 0.5%. The rate of helmet wear was 18%. LCA yielded a model with 6 classes: 'polytrauma' (5.5%), 'brain' (9.0%), 'abdomen' (11.0%), 'upper limb' (20.9%), 'lower limb' (12.4%), and 'head' (41.2%). Class membership had highly significant univariate associations with all covariates except insurance payer. Helmet wear was most common in the 'abdomen' class and least common in the 'polytrauma' and 'brain' classes. Within classes, there was no association of helmet wear with severity of injury. LCA identified 6 clear and distinct patterns of injury with varying demographic and circumstantial associations that may be relevant for prevention. The rate of helmet wear was low, but it varied among classes in accordance with mechanistic expectations. LCA may be an underutilized tool in trauma epidemiology.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Studies of pedal cyclist injuries have largely focused on individual injury categories, but every region of the cyclist's body is exposed to potential trauma. Real-world injury patterns can be complex, and isolated injuries to one body part are uncommon among casualties requiring hospitalization. Latent class analysis (LCA) may identify important patterns in heterogeneous samples of qualitative data.
METHODS
METHODS
Data were taken from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program of the American College of Surgeons for 2017. Inclusion criteria were age 18 years or less and an external cause of injury code for pedal cyclist. Injuries were characterized by Abbreviated Injury Scale codes. Injury categories and the total number of injuries served as covariates for LCA. A model was selected on the basis of the Akaike and Bayesian information criteria and the interpretability of the classes. Associations were analyzed between class membership and demographic factors, circumstantial factors, metrics of injury severity, and helmet wear. Within-class associations of helmet wear with injury severity were analyzed as well.
RESULTS
RESULTS
There were 6151 injured pediatric pedal cyclists in the study sample. The mortality rate was 0.5%. The rate of helmet wear was 18%. LCA yielded a model with 6 classes: 'polytrauma' (5.5%), 'brain' (9.0%), 'abdomen' (11.0%), 'upper limb' (20.9%), 'lower limb' (12.4%), and 'head' (41.2%). Class membership had highly significant univariate associations with all covariates except insurance payer. Helmet wear was most common in the 'abdomen' class and least common in the 'polytrauma' and 'brain' classes. Within classes, there was no association of helmet wear with severity of injury.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
LCA identified 6 clear and distinct patterns of injury with varying demographic and circumstantial associations that may be relevant for prevention. The rate of helmet wear was low, but it varied among classes in accordance with mechanistic expectations. LCA may be an underutilized tool in trauma epidemiology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35074005
doi: 10.1186/s40621-021-00366-2
pii: 10.1186/s40621-021-00366-2
pmc: PMC8785559
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
5Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Agresti A. Categorical data analysis. 3rd ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2013.
American College of Surgeons. Trauma quality programs—participant use file user manual. Chicago: American College of Surgeons; 2017.
Bachynski K, Bateman-House A. Mandatory bicycle helmet laws in the United States: origins, context, and controversies. Am J Public Health. 2020;110(8):1198–204. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305718 .
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305718
pubmed: 32552017
American College of S, Committee on T. Statement on bicycle safety and the promotion of bicycle helmet use. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2014;99(9):45.
Dagher JH, Costa C, Lamoureux J, de Guise E, Feyz M. Comparative outcomes of traumatic brain injury from biking accidents with or without helmet use. Can J Neurol Sci. 2016;43(1):56–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2015.281 .
doi: 10.1017/cjn.2015.281
pubmed: 26786638
Du RY, LoPresti MA, Garcia RM, Lam S. Primary prevention of road traffic accident-related traumatic brain injuries in younger populations: a systematic review of helmet legislation. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.10.PEDS19377 .
doi: 10.3171/2019.10.PEDS19377
pubmed: 33338998
Gennarelli TA, Wodzin E. Ais 2005: a contemporary injury scale. Injury. 2006;37(12):1083–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2006.07.009 .
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.07.009
pubmed: 17092503
Hoye AK, Jensen ML, Sorensen MWJ. Are helmeted cyclists taking more risk at signalized intersections? Traffic Inj Prev. 2020;21(8):552–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2020.1817417 .
doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1817417
pubmed: 33026846
Lin Z, Fan WD. Exploring bicyclist injury severity in bicycle-vehicle crashes using latent class clustering analysis and partial proportional odds models. J Saf Res. 2021;76:101–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2020.11.012 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.11.012
Linzer DA, Lewis JB. Polca: an R package for polytomous variable latent class analysis. J Stat Softw. 2011; 42(10): 29. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v042.i10
Meehan WP 3rd, Lee LK, Fischer CM, Mannix RC. Bicycle helmet laws are associated with a lower fatality rate from bicycle-motor vehicle collisions. J Pediatr. 2013;163(3):726–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.03.073 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.03.073
pubmed: 23706604
pmcid: 3755017
Michael PD, Davenport DL, Draus JM Jr. Bicycle helmets save more than heads: experience from a pediatric Level 1 trauma hospital. Am Surg. 2017;83(9):1007–11.
doi: 10.1177/000313481708300939
Nadler EP, Potoka DA, Shultz BL, Morrison KE, Ford HR, Gaines BA. The high morbidity associated with handlebar injuries in children. J Trauma. 2005;58(6):1171–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000170107.21534.7a .
doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000170107.21534.7a
pubmed: 15995465
Persaud N, Coleman E, Zwolakowski D, Lauwers B, Cass D. Nonuse of bicycle helmets and risk of fatal head injury: a proportional mortality, case-control study. CMAJ. 2012;184(17):E921–3. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.120988 .
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.120988
pubmed: 23071369
pmcid: 3503925
Piatt J. Mediators of racial disparities in mortality rates after traumatic brain injury in childhood: Data from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.5.PEDS20336 .
doi: 10.3171/2020.5.PEDS20336
pubmed: 32736354
Prati G, De Angelis M, Marin Puchades V, Fraboni F, Pietrantoni L. Characteristics of cyclist crashes in Italy using latent class analysis and association rule mining. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(2):e0171484. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171484 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171484
pubmed: 28158296
pmcid: 5291444
RStudio T. Rstudio: Integrated development environment for R. Boston, MA, RStudio, PBC; 2020. http://www.rstudio.com/ .
Schleinitz K, Petzoldt T, Gehlert T. Risk compensation? The relationship between helmet use and cycling speed under naturalistic conditions. J Saf Res. 2018;67:165–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2018.10.006 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2018.10.006
Sivasankaran SK, Balasubramanian V. Exploring the severity of bicycle-vehicle crashes using latent class clustering approach in India. J Saf Res. 2020;72:127–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2019.12.012 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.12.012
Strotmeyer SJ, Behr C, Fabio A, Gaines BA. Bike helmets prevent pediatric head injury in serious bicycle crashes with motor vehicles. Inj Epidemiol. 2020;7(Suppl 1):24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-020-00249-y .
doi: 10.1186/s40621-020-00249-y
pubmed: 32532330
pmcid: 7291179
Winston FK, Shaw KN, Kreshak AA, Schwarz DF, Gallagher PR, Cnaan A. Hidden spears: handlebars as injury hazards to children. Pediatrics. 1998;102(3 Pt 1):596–601. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.102.3.596 .
doi: 10.1542/peds.102.3.596
pubmed: 9738182
Yasmin S, Eluru N. Latent segmentation based count models: analysis of bicycle safety in Montreal and Toronto. Accid Anal Prev. 2016;95(Pt A):157–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.07.015 .
doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.07.015
pubmed: 27442595